IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v128y2017icp271-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of supercritical coal fired oxy combustion power plant with cryogenic oxygen unit and turbo-compressor

Author

Listed:
  • Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna
  • Składzień, Jan

Abstract

This paper reports the results of thermal, energy, exergy and economic analysis involving a hard coal fired power plant with a two-column cryogenic oxygen unit and operating in an oxy combustion process. As a novelty it was assumed that the auxiliary steam turbine drives the oxygen unit compressor and the bleeding steam for this purpose is extracted between intermediate- and low-pressure stage (ILS) of the main turbine. Calculations were performed to consider a number of alternative designs, in which the principal issue was to consider capacity and efficiency loss of the power plant resulting from the drive of the compressor from a cryogenic oxygen unit. The results showed that steam from ILS of the main turbine could be used for driving air separation unit (ASU) compressor. However, smaller loss of power and efficiency may be achieved with electrical supply of ASU. An application of oxy-fuel process to power plant will cause a decrease of gross efficiency in power unit by 12% points by using steam from ILS and 11% points by using electric motor for driving ASU. Profitability of oxy combustion technology will be achieved when the CO2 emissions price reaches a minimum of 52 Euro/EUAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna & Składzień, Jan, 2017. "Analysis of supercritical coal fired oxy combustion power plant with cryogenic oxygen unit and turbo-compressor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 271-283.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:128:y:2017:i:c:p:271-283
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217305868
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristóbal, Jorge & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo & Jiménez, Laureano & Irabien, Angel, 2012. "Multi-objective optimization of coal-fired electricity production with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 266-272.
    2. Scaccabarozzi, Roberto & Gatti, Manuele & Martelli, Emanuele, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and numerical optimization of the NET Power oxy-combustion cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 505-526.
    3. Oliveira, Flávio A.D. & Carvalho, João A. & Sobrinho, Pedro M. & de Castro, André, 2014. "Analysis of oxy-fuel combustion as an alternative to combustion with air in metal reheating furnaces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 290-297.
    4. Pak, Pyong Sik & Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young, 2009. "Characteristics and economic evaluation of a CO2-capturing repowering system with oxy-fuel combustion for utilizing exhaust gas of molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 1903-1909.
    5. Oboirien, B.O. & North, B.C. & Kleyn, T., 2014. "Techno-economic assessments of oxy-fuel technology for South African coal-fired power stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 550-555.
    6. Hadjipaschalis, Ioannis & Kourtis, George & Poullikkas, Andreas, 2009. "Assessment of oxyfuel power generation technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2637-2644, December.
    7. Wu, Yinghai & Wang, Chunbo & Tan, Yewen & Jia, Lufei & Anthony, Edward J., 2011. "Characterization of ashes from a 100kWth pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed with oxy-fuel combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(9), pages 2940-2948.
    8. Pak, Pyong Sik & Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young, 2010. "Characteristics and economic evaluation of a power plant applying oxy-fuel combustion to increase power output and decrease CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3230-3238.
    9. Davison, John, 2007. "Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1163-1176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miroslav Variny & Dominika Jediná & Miroslav Rimár & Ján Kizek & Marianna Kšiňanová, 2021. "Cutting Oxygen Production-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Improved Compression Heat Management in a Cryogenic Air Separation Unit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-32, October.
    2. Son, Seongmin & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2018. "Application of adjoint sensitivity analysis method to supercritical CO2 power cycle optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1153-1164.
    3. Moon, Ji-Hong & Jo, Sung-Ho & Park, Sung Jin & Khoi, Nguyen Hoang & Seo, Myung Won & Ra, Ho Won & Yoon, Sang-Jun & Yoon, Sung-Min & Lee, Jae-Goo & Mun, Tae-Young, 2019. "Carbon dioxide purity and combustion characteristics of oxy firing compared to air firing in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 183-192.
    4. Trobajo, J.R. & Antuña-Nieto, C. & Rodríguez, E. & García, R. & López-Antón, M.A. & Martínez-Tarazona, M.R., 2018. "Carbon-based sorbents impregnated with iron oxides for removing mercury in energy generation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 648-655.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Zilong & Chen, Yaping & Wu, Jiafeng & Zhang, Shaobo & Zheng, Shuxing, 2019. "A modified Allam cycle without compressors realizing efficient power generation with peak load shifting and CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 478-487.
    2. Oboirien, B.O. & North, B.C. & Kleyn, T., 2014. "Techno-economic assessments of oxy-fuel technology for South African coal-fired power stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 550-555.
    3. Mayr, Bernhard & Prieler, Rene & Demuth, Martin & Hochenauer, Christoph, 2015. "The usability and limits of the steady flamelet approach in oxy-fuel combustions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1478-1489.
    4. Wu Haibo & Liu Zhaohui, 2018. "Economic research relating to a 200 MWe oxy‐fuel combustion power plant," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 911-919, October.
    5. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    6. Pak, Pyong Sik & Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young, 2010. "Characteristics and economic evaluation of a power plant applying oxy-fuel combustion to increase power output and decrease CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3230-3238.
    7. Tang, Yuting & Ma, Xiaoqian & Lai, Zhiyi & Zhou, Daoxi & Lin, Hai & Chen, Yong, 2012. "NOx and SO2 emissions from municipal solid waste (MSW) combustion in CO2/O2 atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 300-306.
    8. Shahsavari Alavijeh, H. & Kiyoumarsioskouei, A. & Asheri, M.H. & Naemi, S. & Shahsavari Alavije, H. & Basirat Tabrizi, H., 2013. "Greenhouse gas emission measurement and economic analysis of Iran natural gas fired power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 200-207.
    9. Kangwanpongpan, Tanin & Corrêa da Silva, Rodrigo & Krautz, Hans Joachim, 2012. "Prediction of oxy-coal combustion through an optimized weighted sum of gray gases model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 244-251.
    10. Višković, Alfredo & Franki, Vladimir & Valentić, Vladimir, 2014. "CCS (carbon capture and storage) investment possibility in South East Europe: A case study for Croatia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 325-337.
    11. Wu, X.D. & Yang, Q. & Chen, G.Q. & Hayat, T. & Alsaedi, A., 2016. "Progress and prospect of CCS in China: Using learning curve to assess the cost-viability of a 2×600MW retrofitted oxyfuel power plant as a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1274-1285.
    12. Safdarnejad, Seyed Mostafa & Hedengren, John D. & Powell, Kody M., 2018. "Performance comparison of low temperature and chemical absorption carbon capture processes in response to dynamic electricity demand and price profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 577-592.
    13. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.
    14. Lai, N.Y.G. & Yap, E.H. & Lee, C.W., 2011. "Viability of CCS: A broad-based assessment for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3608-3616.
    15. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Lee, Suh-Young & Lee, Jae-Uk & Lee, In-Beum & Han, Jeehoon, 2017. "Design under uncertainty of carbon capture and storage infrastructure considering cost, environmental impact, and preference on risk," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 725-738.
    17. Ehsaniderakhshan, Faeze & Mazaheri, Kiumars & Mahmoudi, Yasser, 2020. "Large eddy simulation on combustion noise in a non-premixed turbulent free flame: Effect of oxygen enhancement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    18. Martelli, Emanuele & Freschini, Marco & Zatti, Matteo, 2020. "Optimization of renewable energy subsidy and carbon tax for multi energy systems using bilevel programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    19. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    20. Khalilpour, Rajab, 2014. "Multi-level investment planning and scheduling under electricity and carbon market dynamics: Retrofit of a power plant with PCC (post-combustion carbon capture) processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 172-186.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:128:y:2017:i:c:p:271-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.