IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v32y2007i7p1104-1123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximation of theoretical energy-saving potentials for the petrochemical industry using energy balances for 68 key processes

Author

Listed:
  • Neelis, Maarten
  • Patel, Martin
  • Blok, Kornelis
  • Haije, Wim
  • Bach, Pieter

Abstract

We prepared energy and carbon balances for 68 petrochemical processes in the petrochemical industry for Western Europe, the Netherlands and the world. We analysed the process energy use in relation to the heat effects of the chemical reactions and quantified in this way the sum of all energy inputs into the processes that do not end up in the useful products of the process, but are lost as waste heat to the environment. We showed that both process energy use and heat effects of reaction contribute significantly to the overall energy loss of the processes studied and recommend addressing reaction effects explicitly in energy-efficiency studies. We estimated the energy loss in Western Europe in the year 2000 at 1620PJ of final energy and 1936PJ of primary energy, resulting in a total of 127Mt CO2. The losses identified can be regarded as good approximations of the theoretical energy-saving potentials of the processes analysed. The processes with large energy losses in relative (per tonne of product) and absolute (in PJ per year) terms are recommended for more detailed analysis taking into account further thermodynamic, economic, and practical considerations to identify technical and economic energy-saving potentials.

Suggested Citation

  • Neelis, Maarten & Patel, Martin & Blok, Kornelis & Haije, Wim & Bach, Pieter, 2007. "Approximation of theoretical energy-saving potentials for the petrochemical industry using energy balances for 68 key processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1104-1123.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:32:y:2007:i:7:p:1104-1123
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544206002362
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leites, I.L. & Sama, D.A. & Lior, N., 2003. "The theory and practice of energy saving in the chemical industry: some methods for reducing thermodynamic irreversibility in chemical technology processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 55-97.
    2. Patel, M., 2003. "Cumulative energy demand (CED) and cumulative CO2 emissions for products of the organic chemical industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 721-740.
    3. Phylipsen, Dian & Blok, Kornelis & Worrell, Ernst & Beer, Jeroen de, 2002. "Benchmarking the energy efficiency of Dutch industry: an assessment of the expected effect on energy consumption and CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 663-679, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khan, Sidra, 2022. "Effects of Green Human Resource Management practices on environmental performance: Evidence from Textile Sector of Emerging Country," MPRA Paper 112379, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Tian, Jinping & Shi, Han & Li, Xing & Chen, Lujun, 2012. "Measures and potentials of energy-saving in a Chinese fine chemical industrial park," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 459-470.
    3. Weiss, Martin & Neelis, Maarten L. & Blok, Kornelis & Patel, Martin K., 2008. "Non-energy use and related carbon dioxide emissions in Germany: A carbon flow analysis with the NEAT model for the period of 1990–2003," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(11), pages 1252-1265.
    4. Silva, Felipe L.C. & Souza, Reinaldo C. & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando L. & Lourenco, Plutarcho M. & Calili, Rodrigo F., 2018. "A bottom-up methodology for long term electricity consumption forecasting of an industrial sector - Application to pulp and paper sector in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1107-1118.
    5. Chen, Xiaohui & Zheng, Danxing & Chen, Juan, 2014. "An approach to obtain Heat Integration scheme with higher viability for complex system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 720-731.
    6. Neelis, M.L. & Pouwelse, J.W., 2008. "Towards consistent and reliable Dutch and international energy statistics for the chemical industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2719-2733, July.
    7. Hong, Gui-Bing & Ma, Chih-Ming & Chen, Hua-Wei & Chuang, Kai-Jen & Chang, Chang-Tang & Su, Te-Li, 2011. "Energy flow analysis in pulp and paper industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3063-3068.
    8. Huang, Yun-Hsun & Chang, Yi-Lin & Fleiter, Tobias, 2016. "A critical analysis of energy efficiency improvement potentials in Taiwan's cement industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 14-26.
    9. Changsheng Li & Lei Zhu & Tobias Fleiter, 2014. "Energy Efficiency Potentials in the Chlor-Alkali Sector — A Case Study of Shandong Province in China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 25(3-4), pages 661-686, April.
    10. Saygin, D. & Worrell, E. & Tam, C. & Trudeau, N. & Gielen, D.J. & Weiss, M. & Patel, M.K., 2012. "Long-term energy efficiency analysis requires solid energy statistics: The case of the German basic chemical industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1094-1106.
    11. Meerman, J.C. & Ramírez, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2011. "Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities. Part A: A technical-energetic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2563-2587, August.
    12. Saygin, D. & Patel, M.K. & Worrell, E. & Tam, C. & Gielen, D.J., 2011. "Potential of best practice technology to improve energy efficiency in the global chemical and petrochemical sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 5779-5790.
    13. Milena N. Rajić & Rado M. Maksimović & Pedja Milosavljević & Dragan Pavlović, 2019. "Energy Management System Application for Sustainable Development in Wood Industry Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. da Silva, Felipe L.C. & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando L. & Souza, Reinaldo C., 2019. "A bottom-up bayesian extension for long term electricity consumption forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 198-210.
    15. Lin, Hsin-Chiu & Chan, David Yih-Liang & Lin, Wei-Chun & Hsu, Chung-Hsuan & Hong, Gui-Bing, 2014. "Status of energy conservation in Taiwan's pulp and paper industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 680-685.
    16. Brueckner, Sarah & Miró, Laia & Cabeza, Luisa F. & Pehnt, Martin & Laevemann, Eberhard, 2014. "Methods to estimate the industrial waste heat potential of regions – A categorization and literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 164-171.
    17. van de Bor, D.M. & Infante Ferreira, C.A., 2013. "Quick selection of industrial heat pump types including the impact of thermodynamic losses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 312-322.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Shiyi & Lior, Noam & Xiang, Wenguo, 2015. "Coal gasification integration with solid oxide fuel cell and chemical looping combustion for high-efficiency power generation with inherent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 298-312.
    2. Kong, Lingbo & Price, Lynn & Hasanbeigi, Ali & Liu, Huanbin & Li, Jigeng, 2013. "Potential for reducing paper mill energy use and carbon dioxide emissions through plant-wide energy audits: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1334-1342.
    3. Velasco-Fernández, Raúl & Dunlop, Tessa & Giampietro, Mario, 2020. "Fallacies of energy efficiency indicators: Recognizing the complexity of the metabolic pattern of the economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Fernando, Yudi & Hor, Wei Lin, 2017. "Impacts of energy management practices on energy efficiency and carbon emissions reduction: A survey of malaysian manufacturing firms," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 62-73.
    5. Toghyani, Mahboubeh & Rahimi, Amir, 2015. "Exergy analysis of an industrial unit of catalyst regeneration based on the results of modeling and simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1049-1056.
    6. Mattia Rapa & Laura Gobbi & Roberto Ruggieri, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Electric Vehicles: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Evaluation of Electricity Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Hong, Gui-Bing & Ma, Chih-Ming & Chen, Hua-Wei & Chuang, Kai-Jen & Chang, Chang-Tang & Su, Te-Li, 2011. "Energy flow analysis in pulp and paper industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3063-3068.
    8. Rosner, Fabian & Chen, Qin & Rao, Ashok & Samuelsen, Scott, 2020. "Thermo-economic analyses of isothermal water gas shift reactor integrations into IGCC power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    9. Chu, Fengming & Yang, Lijun & Du, Xiaoze & Yang, Yongping, 2016. "CO2 capture using MEA (monoethanolamine) aqueous solution in coal-fired power plants: Modeling and optimization of the absorbing columns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 495-505.
    10. Jaber, Jamal O. & Mamlook, Rustom & Awad, Wa'el, 2005. "Evaluation of energy conservation programs in residential sector using fuzzy logic methodology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1329-1338, July.
    11. Ke, Jing & Price, Lynn & McNeil, Michael & Khanna, Nina Zheng & Zhou, Nan, 2013. "Analysis and practices of energy benchmarking for industry from the perspective of systems engineering," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 32-44.
    12. Khoa, T.D. & Shuhaimi, M. & Hashim, H. & Panjeshahi, M.H., 2010. "Optimal design of distillation column using three dimensional exergy analysis curves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5309-5319.
    13. Perroni, Marcos G. & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Vieira da Silva, Wesley & Tortato, Ubiratã, 2018. "Measuring energy performance: A process based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 540-553.
    14. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & Nascimento Silva, Fernanda & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2019. "Syngas production with thermo-chemically recuperated gas expansion systems: An exergy analysis and energy integration study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 293-308.
    15. Enrico Sciubba, 2014. "A Critical Interpretation and Quantitative Extension of the Sama-Szargut Second Law Rules in an Extended Exergy Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Salvatori, Simone & Benedetti, Miriam & Bonfà, Francesca & Introna, Vito & Ubertini, Stefano, 2018. "Inter-sectorial benchmarking of compressed air generation energy performance: Methodology based on real data gathering in large and energy-intensive industrial firms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 266-280.
    17. Marilyn Brown, 2015. "Innovative energy‐efficiency policies: an international review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Halmann, M. & Steinfeld, A., 2006. "Production of lime, hydrogen, and methanol by the thermo-neutral combined calcination of limestone with partial oxidation of natural gas or coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1533-1541.
    19. Geuzebroek, F.H. & Schneiders, L.H.J.M. & Kraaijveld, G.J.C. & Feron, P.H.M., 2004. "Exergy analysis of alkanolamine-based CO2 removal unit with AspenPlus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1241-1248.
    20. Fahd, S. & Fiorentino, G. & Mellino, S. & Ulgiati, S., 2012. "Cropping bioenergy and biomaterials in marginal land: The added value of the biorefinery concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 79-93.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:32:y:2007:i:7:p:1104-1123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.