IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v264y2023ics0360544222030468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exergy based assessment of the efficiency of nuclear fuel cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Rigby, Aidan
  • Lindley, Ben
  • Cullen, Jonathan

Abstract

As energy systems worldwide change to mitigate against climate change, the sustainability of electricity production methods is becoming increasingly relevant. Nuclear energy is constrained by the need for the efficient conversion of uranium to electricity to define itself as sustainable. The thermodynamic measure of available energy of work – exergy – is used to analyse nuclear fuel cycle processes by accounting for material and energy flows over whole conversion chains. This study proposes that a more comprehensive definition of nuclear exergy is needed to account for the additional exergy released in nuclear decay. This allows the extension of nuclear exergy analysis to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle and novel decay heat applications. Furthermore, nuclear decay exergy is shown to add approximately 10% to previous definitions of the exergy of fissile isotopes which accounts for the additional energy released by fission products in decay. To aid future research an evaluation of this nuclear decay exergy is performed for 3000+ nuclear isotopes. The new definition of nuclear exergy is employed in investigating the sustainability of advanced nuclear fuel cycles. This analysis uses quantitative exergy efficiency metrics and Sankey diagrams to represent certain sustainability trade-offs numerically and visually.

Suggested Citation

  • Rigby, Aidan & Lindley, Ben & Cullen, Jonathan, 2023. "An exergy based assessment of the efficiency of nuclear fuel cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:264:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222030468
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222030468
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lupton, R.C. & Allwood, J.M., 2017. "Hybrid Sankey diagrams: Visual analysis of multidimensional data for understanding resource use," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 141-151.
    2. Wuseong You & Ser Gi Hong, 2017. "An Advanced Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Core Concept Using Uranium-Free Metallic Fuels for Maximizing TRU Burning Rate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Ola Eriksson, 2017. "Nuclear Power and Resource Efficiency—A Proposal for a Revised Primary Energy Factor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Stanek, Wojciech & Szargut, Jan & Kolenda, Zygmunt & Czarnowska, Lucyna, 2016. "Exergo-ecological and economic evaluation of a nuclear power plant within the whole life cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 369-377.
    5. Stamford, Laurence & Azapagic, Adisa, 2011. "Sustainability indicators for the assessment of nuclear power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6037-6057.
    6. Rivero, R. & Garfias, M., 2006. "Standard chemical exergy of elements updated," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3310-3326.
    7. Weißbach, D. & Ruprecht, G. & Huke, A. & Czerski, K. & Gottlieb, S. & Hussein, A., 2013. "Energy intensities, EROIs (energy returned on invested), and energy payback times of electricity generating power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 210-221.
    8. Schneider, E. & Carlsen, B. & Tavrides, E. & van der Hoeven, C. & Phathanapirom, U., 2013. "Measures of the environmental footprint of the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 898-910.
    9. Hermann, Weston A., 2006. "Quantifying global exergy resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1685-1702.
    10. Ayres, Robert U. & Ayres, Leslie W. & Martinás, Katalin, 1998. "Exergy, waste accounting, and life-cycle analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 355-363.
    11. Gao, Ruxing & Nam, Hyo On & Ko, Won Il & Jang, Hong, 2018. "Integrated system evaluation of nuclear fuel cycle options in China combined with an analytical MCDM framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 221-233.
    12. Naserbegi, A. & Aghaie, M. & Minuchehr, A. & Alahyarizadeh, Gh, 2018. "A novel exergy optimization of Bushehr nuclear power plant by gravitational search algorithm (GSA)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 373-385.
    13. Poinssot, Ch. & Bourg, S. & Ouvrier, N. & Combernoux, N. & Rostaing, C. & Vargas-Gonzalez, M. & Bruno, J., 2014. "Assessment of the environmental footprint of nuclear energy systems. Comparison between closed and open fuel cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 199-211.
    14. Coenraad D. Westbroek & Jennifer Bitting & Matteo Craglia & José M. C. Azevedo & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "Global material flow analysis of glass: From raw materials to end of life," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 333-343, April.
    15. Joshua M. Pearce, 2012. "Limitations of Nuclear Power as a Sustainable Energy Source," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Durmayaz, Ahmet & Yavuz, Hasbi, 2001. "Exergy analysis of a pressurized-water reactor nuclear-power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 39-57, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chende Xu & Zhengguang Wang & Shuai Tang & Xiangyu Chi & Xixi Zhu & Yaru Li & Naihua Wang, 2023. "Research Progress on Thermal Hydraulic Characteristics of Spent Fuel Pools: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles Neumeyer & Robert Goldston, 2016. "Dynamic EROI Assessment of the IPCC 21st Century Electricity Production Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Song, Guohui & Xiao, Jun & Zhao, Hao & Shen, Laihong, 2012. "A unified correlation for estimating specific chemical exergy of solid and liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 164-173.
    3. Bilgen, Selçuk & Keleş, Sedat & Kaygusuz, Kamil, 2012. "Calculation of higher and lower heating values and chemical exergy values of liquid products obtained from pyrolysis of hazelnut cupulae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 380-385.
    4. Kyrke Gaudreau & Roydon A. Fraser & Stephen Murphy, 2012. "The Characteristics of the Exergy Reference Environment and Its Implications for Sustainability-Based Decision-Making," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Talens Peiró, L. & Lombardi, L. & Villalba Méndez, G. & Gabarrell i Durany, X., 2010. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) and exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA) of the production of biodiesel from used cooking oil (UCO)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 889-893.
    6. Bilgen, Selçuk & Kaygusuz, Kamil, 2008. "The calculation of the chemical exergies of coal-based fuels by using the higher heating values," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(8), pages 776-785, August.
    7. Stanek, Wojciech & Szargut, Jan & Kolenda, Zygmunt & Czarnowska, Lucyna, 2016. "Exergo-ecological and economic evaluation of a nuclear power plant within the whole life cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 369-377.
    8. Igor Petruška & Eva Litavcová & Jana Chovancová, 2022. "Impact of Renewable Energy Sources and Nuclear Energy on CO 2 Emissions Reductions—The Case of the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Mohan, Aniruddh, 2017. "Whose land is it anyway? Energy futures & land use in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 257-262.
    10. Robin Taylor & William Bodel & Laurence Stamford & Gregg Butler, 2022. "A Review of Environmental and Economic Implications of Closing the Nuclear Fuel Cycle—Part One: Wastes and Environmental Impacts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-35, February.
    11. Teles dos Santos, Moisés & Park, Song Won, 2013. "Sustainability and biophysics basis of technical and economic processes: A survey of the reconciliation by thermodynamics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 261-271.
    12. Razmi, Amir Reza & Hanifi, Amir Reza & Shahbakhti, Mahdi, 2023. "Design, thermodynamic, and economic analyses of a green hydrogen storage concept based on solid oxide electrolyzer/fuel cells and heliostat solar field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    13. Stanek, Wojciech & Czarnowska, Lucyna, 2018. "Thermo-ecological cost – Szargut's proposal on exergy and ecology connection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1050-1059.
    14. Mahtta, Richa & Joshi, P.K. & Jindal, Alok Kumar, 2014. "Solar power potential mapping in India using remote sensing inputs and environmental parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 255-262.
    15. Fonseca, Juan D. & Commenge, Jean-Marc & Camargo, Mauricio & Falk, Laurent & Gil, Iván D., 2021. "Sustainability analysis for the design of distributed energy systems: A multi-objective optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    16. Aydın, Cem İskender, 2020. "Nuclear energy debate in Turkey: Stakeholders, policy alternatives, and governance issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2007. "Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy--a case study of the Chinese society 1981-2001," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 355-376, March.
    18. Lukáš Režný & Vladimír Bureš, 2019. "Energy Transition Scenarios and Their Economic Impacts in the Extended Neoclassical Model of Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-25, July.
    19. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Qi, Hai & Gao, Xiangyun, 2016. "Evolution of the exergy flow network embodied in the global fossil energy trade: Based on complex network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1515-1522.
    20. Colombo, Emanuela & Rocco, Matteo V. & Toro, Claudia & Sciubba, Enrico, 2015. "An exergy-based approach to the joint economic and environmental impact assessment of possible photovoltaic scenarios: A case study at a regional level in Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 64-74.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:264:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222030468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.