IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v226y2021ics0360544221006113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of technological progress on energy intensity in China (2005–2016): Evidence from a geographically and temporally weighted regression model

Author

Listed:
  • Hui, Wang
  • Xin-gang, Zhao
  • Ling-zhi, Ren
  • Ji-cheng, Fan
  • Fan, Lu

Abstract

This paper selected the relevant data of China’s thirty administrative regions from 2005 to 2016, and constructed a geographically and temporally weighted regression model of technological progress and energy intensity, to fully analyze the heterogeneous impact of technological progress on energy intensity. The results showed that: (1) The energy intensity of China’s different regions, in the long run, had an obvious spatial agglomeration effect and a significant positive correlation in spatial. (2) The spatial heterogeneity of the impact of technological progress on energy intensity changed smoothly and steadily in the temporal dimension, and the dominant factors affecting the energy intensity gradually shifted from foreign direct investment, opening-up degree, human capital to research and development funds from 2005 to 2016. (3) The temporal heterogeneity of the effect of technological progress on energy intensity varied greatly from different spatial dimensions, specifically, the influence of research and development funds on energy intensity was high in the western regions and low in the eastern regions, but that of the foreign direct investment was the opposite, the spatial distribution of the effects of opening-up degree, human capital on energy intensity was dispersed and had no obvious aggregation phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui, Wang & Xin-gang, Zhao & Ling-zhi, Ren & Ji-cheng, Fan & Fan, Lu, 2021. "The impact of technological progress on energy intensity in China (2005–2016): Evidence from a geographically and temporally weighted regression model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:226:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221006113
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221006113
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Investigating spatial variability of CO2 emissions in heavy industry: Evidence from a geographically weighted regression model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Li, Ke & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "How to promote energy efficiency through technological progress in China?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 812-821.
    3. Victor Ajayi & David Reiner, 2018. "European Industrial Energy Intensity: The Role of Innovation 1995-2009," Working Papers EPRG 1818, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    4. Caballe, Jordi & Santos, Manuel S, 1993. "On Endogenous Growth with Physical and Human Capital," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 101(6), pages 1042-1067, December.
    5. Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Murad, Md. Wahid, 2020. "The impacts of economic growth, trade openness and technological progress on renewable energy use in organization for economic co-operation and development countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 382-390.
    6. Huang, Junbing & Lai, Yali & Hu, Hanlei, 2020. "The effect of technological factors and structural change on China's energy intensity: Evidence from dynamic panel models," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Bilgili, Faik & Koçak, Emrah & Bulut, Ümit & Kuloğlu, Ayhan, 2017. "The impact of urbanization on energy intensity: Panel data evidence considering cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 242-256.
    8. Wang, Shaojian & Liu, Xiaoping, 2017. "China’s city-level energy-related CO2 emissions: Spatiotemporal patterns and driving forces," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 204-214.
    9. Sagar, Ambuj D. & van der Zwaan, Bob, 2006. "Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D, deployment, and learning-by-doing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 2601-2608, November.
    10. Wang, Huiqing & Wei, Weixian, 2020. "Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: The optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Torrie, Ralph D. & Stone, Christopher & Layzell, David B., 2016. "Understanding energy systems change in Canada: 1. Decomposition of total energy intensity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 101-106.
    12. Vélez-Henao, Johan-Andrés & Font Vivanco, David & Hernández-Riveros, Jesús-Antonio, 2019. "Technological change and the rebound effect in the STIRPAT model: A critical view," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1372-1381.
    13. Chen, Dengke & Chen, Shiyi & Jin, Hao & Lu, Yulin, 2020. "The impact of energy regulation on energy intensity and energy structure: Firm-level evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    14. Huang, Junbing & Du, Dan & Hao, Yu, 2017. "The driving forces of the change in China's energy intensity: An empirical research using DEA-Malmquist and spatial panel estimations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 41-50.
    15. Xie, Xuan & Lin, Boqiang, 2019. "Understanding the energy intensity change in China's food industry: A comprehensive decomposition method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 53-68.
    16. Pan, Xiongfeng & Uddin, Md. Kamal & Han, Cuicui & Pan, Xianyou, 2019. "Dynamics of financial development, trade openness, technological innovation and energy intensity: Evidence from Bangladesh," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 456-464.
    17. Elliott, Robert J.R. & Sun, Puyang & Zhu, Tong, 2017. "The direct and indirect effect of urbanization on energy intensity: A province-level study for China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 677-692.
    18. Tan, Ruipeng & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "What factors lead to the decline of energy intensity in China's energy intensive industries?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 213-221.
    19. La Torre, Davide & Marsiglio, Simone, 2010. "Endogenous technological progress in a multi-sector growth model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 1017-1028, September.
    20. Antal, Miklós & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2014. "Re-spending rebound: A macro-level assessment for OECD countries and emerging economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 585-590.
    21. Azhgaliyeva, Dina & Liu, Yang & Liddle, Brantley, 2020. "An empirical analysis of energy intensity and the role of policy instruments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Shu & Ding, Song, 2021. "Efficiency improvement, structural change, and energy intensity reduction: Evidence from Chinese agricultural sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Chen, Zhongfei & Huang, Wanjing & Zheng, Xian, 2019. "The decline in energy intensity: Does financial development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Trinh, Hai Hong & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Vo, Diem Thi Hong, 2022. "Examining the heterogeneity of financial development in the energy-environment nexus in the era of climate change: Novel evidence around the world," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Rui Ding & Tao Zhou & Jian Yin & Yilin Zhang & Siwei Shen & Jun Fu & Linyu Du & Yiming Du & Shihui Chen, 2022. "Does the Urban Agglomeration Policy Reduce Energy Intensity? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Yulan Lv & Wei Chen & Jianquan Cheng, 2019. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Urbanization on Energy Intensity in Chinese Cities: A Regional Heterogeneity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Pan, Xiuzhen & Wei, Zixiang & Han, Botang & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2021. "The heterogeneous impacts of interregional green technology spillover on energy intensity in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    7. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Mengmeng, 2019. "Quantitative assessment of factors affecting energy intensity from sector, region and time perspectives using decomposition method: A case of China’s metallurgical industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Zhou, Anhua & Li, Jun, 2022. "How do trade liberalization and human capital affect renewable energy consumption? Evidence from the panel threshold model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 332-342.
    9. Pan, Xiongfeng & Uddin, Md. Kamal & Saima, Umme & Jiao, Zhiming & Han, Cuicui, 2019. "How do industrialization and trade openness influence energy intensity? Evidence from a path model in case of Bangladesh," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Guang, Fengtao & He, Yongxiu & Wen, Le & Sharp, Basil, 2019. "Energy intensity and its differences across China’s regions: Combining econometric and decomposition analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 989-1000.
    11. Bashir, Muhammad Adnan & Sheng, Bin & Doğan, Buhari & Sarwar, Suleman & Shahzad, Umer, 2020. "Export product diversification and energy efficiency: Empirical evidence from OECD countries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 232-243.
    12. Karasoy, Alper, 2022. "Is innovative technology a solution to Japan's long-run energy insecurity? Dynamic evidence from the linear and nonlinear methods," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Kingsley Appiah & Jianguo Du & Michael Yeboah & Rhoda Appiah, 2019. "Causal relationship between Industrialization, Energy Intensity, Economic Growth and Carbon dioxide emissions: recent evidence from Uganda," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 237-245.
    14. Ouyang, Xiaoling & Gao, Beiying & Du, Kerui & Du, Gang, 2018. "Industrial sectors' energy rebound effect: An empirical study of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 408-416.
    15. Zhou, P. & Zhang, H. & Zhang, L.P., 2022. "The drivers of energy intensity changes in Chinese cities: A production-theoretical decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    16. Raza, Muhammad Yousaf & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Future outlook and influencing factors analysis of natural gas consumption in Bangladesh: An economic and policy perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Jin, Taeyoung, 2022. "Impact of heat and electricity consumption on energy intensity: A panel data analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    18. Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin & Klege, Rebecca A. & Adom, Philip K. & Amoah, Anthony & Hagan, Edmond, 2018. "Unveiling the energy saving role of banking performance in Sub-Sahara Africa," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 828-842.
    19. Wen, Huwei & Li, Nuoyan & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2021. "Energy intensity of manufacturing enterprises under competitive pressure from the informal sector: Evidence from developing and emerging countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    20. Zhang, Dayong & Li, Jun & Ji, Qiang, 2020. "Does better access to credit help reduce energy intensity in China? Evidence from manufacturing firms," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:226:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221006113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.