IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v147y2018icp884-895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a sorption-enhanced palladium membrane reactor for enhancing hydrogen production from methane steam reforming

Author

Listed:
  • Ji, Guozhao
  • Zhao, Ming
  • Wang, Geoff

Abstract

To understand the reaction process of methane steam reforming in a sorption enhanced membrane reactor (SEMR), a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model was developed to simulate the methane (CH4) steam reforming in a palladium-based membrane reactor using a Ni-based catalyst and Na2ZrO3 CO2 sorbent. The CFD model gained the insight of details in the reactor which could not be obtained by experiment. With the detailed information, this model detected the difference of reaction kinetics and fluid dynamic conditions in a SEMR and a traditional membrane reactor (MR). The comparison suggests that sorption-enhanced membrane reactor not only decreases CO2 fraction, but also improves hydrogen (H2) production by increasing reaction rates, CH4 conversion and H2 yield. The poisoning effect of carbon monoxide (CO) on the palladium membrane can also be minimized by reduced CO fraction as a result of in-situ CO2 capture.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji, Guozhao & Zhao, Ming & Wang, Geoff, 2018. "Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a sorption-enhanced palladium membrane reactor for enhancing hydrogen production from methane steam reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 884-895.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:147:y:2018:i:c:p:884-895
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218301105
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saxena, R.C. & Seal, Diptendu & Kumar, Satinder & Goyal, H.B., 2008. "Thermo-chemical routes for hydrogen rich gas from biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(7), pages 1909-1927, September.
    2. Barelli, L. & Bidini, G. & Gallorini, F. & Servili, S., 2008. "Hydrogen production through sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming and membrane technology: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 554-570.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ji, Guozhao & Yang, Hang & Memon, Muhammad Zaki & Gao, Yuan & Qu, Boyu & Fu, Weng & Olguin, Gianni & Zhao, Ming & Li, Aimin, 2020. "Recent advances on kinetics of carbon dioxide capture using solid sorbents at elevated temperatures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Wang, Weijian & Olguin, Gianni & Hotza, Dachamir & Seelro, Majid Ali & Fu, Weng & Gao, Yuan & Ji, Guozhao, 2022. "Inorganic membranes for in-situ separation of hydrogen and enhancement of hydrogen production from thermochemical reactions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Pourali, Mostafa & Esfahani, Javad Abolfazli, 2022. "Performance analysis of a micro-scale integrated hydrogen production system by analytical approach, machine learning, and response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Tang, Xin-Yuan & Yang, Wei-Wei & Ma, Xu & Cao, Xiangkun Elvis, 2023. "An integrated modeling method for membrane reactors and optimization study of operating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    5. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Li, Shu-Cheng & Lim, Steven & Chen, Zih-Yu & Juan, Joon Ching, 2021. "Reaction and hydrogen production phenomena of ethanol steam reforming in a catalytic membrane reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    6. Cai, Lei & He, Tianzhi & Xiang, Yanlei & Guan, Yanwen, 2020. "Study on the reaction pathways of steam methane reforming for H2 production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    7. Rosha, Pali & Mohapatra, Saroj Kumar & Mahla, Sunil Kumar & Dhir, Amit, 2019. "Hydrogen enrichment of biogas via dry and autothermal-dry reforming with pure nickel (Ni) nanoparticle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 733-739.
    8. Wachter, Philipp & Gaber, Christian & Demuth, Martin & Hochenauer, Christoph, 2020. "Experimental investigation of tri-reforming on a stationary, recuperative TCR-reformer applied to an oxy-fuel combustion of natural gas, using a Ni-catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Antzaras, Andy N. & Lemonidou, Angeliki A., 2022. "Recent advances on materials and processes for intensified production of blue hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Inbamrung, Piyanut & Sornchamni, Thana & Prapainainar, Chaiwat & Tungkamani, Sabaithip & Narataruksa, Phavanee & Jovanovic, Goran N., 2018. "Modeling of a square channel monolith reactor for methane steam reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 383-400.
    11. Siavashi, Majid & Hosseini, Farzad & Talesh Bahrami, Hamid Reza, 2021. "A new design with preheating and layered porous ceramic for hydrogen production through methane steam reforming process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahimpour, M.R. & Mirvakili, A. & Paymooni, K., 2011. "A novel water perm-selective membrane dual-type reactor concept for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis of GTL (gas to liquid) technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1223-1235.
    2. Smoliński, A. & Howaniec, N. & Stańczyk, K., 2011. "A comparative experimental study of biomass, lignite and hard coal steam gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1836-1842.
    3. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    4. Ding, Haoran & Tong, Sirui & Qi, Zhifu & Liu, Fei & Sun, Shien & Han, Long, 2023. "Syngas production from chemical-looping steam methane reforming: The effect of channel geometry on BaCoO3/CeO2 monolithic oxygen carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    5. Abdollahzadeh, M. & Ribeirinha, P. & Boaventura, M. & Mendes, A., 2018. "Three-dimensional modeling of PEMFC with contaminated anode fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 939-959.
    6. M. Faizal & L. S. Chuah & C. Lee & A. Hameed & J. Lee & M. Shankar, 2019. "Review Of Hydrogen Fuel For Internal Combustion Engines," Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research & Developments (JMERD), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 35-46, April.
    7. Zhou, Hui & Park, Ah-Hyung Alissa, 2020. "Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage via alkaline thermal Treatment: Production of high purity H2 from wet wheat straw grass with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    8. Sanusi, Yinka S. & Mokheimer, Esmail M.A., 2019. "Thermo-economic optimization of hydrogen production in a membrane-SMR integrated to ITM-oxy-combustion plant using genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 164-176.
    9. Burra, K.G. & Hussein, M.S. & Amano, R.S. & Gupta, A.K., 2016. "Syngas evolutionary behavior during chicken manure pyrolysis and air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 408-415.
    10. Hafizi, A. & Rahimpour, M.R. & Hassanajili, Sh., 2016. "Hydrogen production via chemical looping steam methane reforming process: Effect of cerium and calcium promoters on the performance of Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 685-694.
    11. Sirui Tong & Bin Miao & Lan Zhang & Siew Hwa Chan, 2022. "Decarbonizing Natural Gas: A Review of Catalytic Decomposition and Carbon Formation Mechanisms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-30, April.
    12. Perejón, Antonio & Romeo, Luis M. & Lara, Yolanda & Lisbona, Pilar & Martínez, Ana & Valverde, Jose Manuel, 2016. "The Calcium-Looping technology for CO2 capture: On the important roles of energy integration and sorbent behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 787-807.
    13. Hong, Sung Kook & Dong, Sang Keun & Han, Jeong Ok & Lee, Joong Seong & Lee, Young Chul, 2013. "Numerical study of effect of operating and design parameters for design of steam reforming reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 410-418.
    14. Tang, Xin-Yuan & Yang, Wei-Wei & Ma, Xu & Cao, Xiangkun Elvis, 2023. "An integrated modeling method for membrane reactors and optimization study of operating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    15. Lin, Kuang C. & Lin, Yuan-Chung & Hsiao, Yi-Hsing, 2014. "Microwave plasma studies of Spirulina algae pyrolysis with relevance to hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 567-574.
    16. Peydayesh, Mohammad & Mohammadi, Toraj & Bakhtiari, Omid, 2017. "Effective hydrogen purification from methane via polyimide Matrimid® 5218- Deca-dodecasil 3R type zeolite mixed matrix membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2100-2107.
    17. Chutichai, Bhawasut & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2015. "Parametric analysis of a circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifier for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 406-413.
    18. AlNouss, Ahmed & Parthasarathy, Prakash & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    19. Mohammed, M.A.A. & Salmiaton, A. & Wan Azlina, W.A.K.G. & Mohammad Amran, M.S. & Fakhru'l-Razi, A. & Taufiq-Yap, Y.H., 2011. "Hydrogen rich gas from oil palm biomass as a potential source of renewable energy in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 1258-1270, February.
    20. Fugang Zhu & Laihong Shen & Pengcheng Xu & Haoran Yuan & Ming Hu & Jingwei Qi & Yong Chen, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of an Improved Updraft Biomass Gasifier Based on Aspen Plus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:147:y:2018:i:c:p:884-895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.