IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v207y2020ics0360544220314031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the reaction pathways of steam methane reforming for H2 production

Author

Listed:
  • Cai, Lei
  • He, Tianzhi
  • Xiang, Yanlei
  • Guan, Yanwen

Abstract

Steam methane reforming is a common commercial technology for practical H2 production. The steam methane reforming process is numerically studied in this work. The key elementary reactions and intermediate species are analyzed to reveal H2 reaction pathways. Influences of temperature, pressure and S/C (the ratio of steam to carbon) on the H2 reaction pathways are investigated. The results demonstrate that the intermediate species, CH3, C2H6 and CH3OH play an important role in H2 yield. When temperature increases from 600 °C to 1000 °C under 3 MPa and S/C = 3, mole fraction of H2 at outlet rises from 44.91% to 50.21% and the energy efficiency of the reforming process rises from 64.81% to 80.63%. Pathways of CH4→H2 and CH3OH→CH2OH→CH2O→H2 are strengthened. With pressure rising from 2 MPa to 3 MPa under 600 °C and S/C = 3, mole fraction of H2 and the energy efficiency vary from 40.79% to 44.91% and 61.29%–64.81% respectively. Pathways of C2H6→C2H5→H2 and CH3OH→H2 make more contributions to the yield of H2. When S/C rises from 3 to 6 under 600 °C and 3 MPa, dry mole fraction of H2 and the energy efficiency change from 71.52% to 75.85% and 64.81%–89.07% respectively. CH3OH→H2, CH3OH→CH2OH→CH2O→H2 and CH3OH→CH2OH→CH2O→HCO→H2 are significantly enhanced by the rising S/C.

Suggested Citation

  • Cai, Lei & He, Tianzhi & Xiang, Yanlei & Guan, Yanwen, 2020. "Study on the reaction pathways of steam methane reforming for H2 production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:207:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220314031
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220314031
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inbamrung, Piyanut & Sornchamni, Thana & Prapainainar, Chaiwat & Tungkamani, Sabaithip & Narataruksa, Phavanee & Jovanovic, Goran N., 2018. "Modeling of a square channel monolith reactor for methane steam reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 383-400.
    2. Pashchenko, Dmitry, 2018. "First law energy analysis of thermochemical waste-heat recuperation by steam methane reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 478-487.
    3. Honzawa, Takafumi & Kai, Reo & Okada, Akiko & Valera-Medina, Agustin & Bowen, Philip J. & Kurose, Ryoichi, 2019. "Predictions of NO and CO emissions in ammonia/methane/air combustion by LES using a non-adiabatic flamelet generated manifold," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    4. R. D. Cortright & R. R. Davda & J. A. Dumesic, 2002. "Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6901), pages 964-967, August.
    5. Ngo, Son Ich & Lim, Young-Il & Kim, Woohyun & Seo, Dong Joo & Yoon, Wang Lai, 2019. "Computational fluid dynamics and experimental validation of a compact steam methane reformer for hydrogen production from natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 340-353.
    6. Bentsen, Niclas Scott & Jack, Michael W. & Felby, Claus & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, 2014. "Allocation of biomass resources for minimising energy system greenhouse gas emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 506-515.
    7. Parthasarathy, Prakash & Narayanan, K. Sheeba, 2014. "Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: Influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield – A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 570-579.
    8. Saxena, R.C. & Seal, Diptendu & Kumar, Satinder & Goyal, H.B., 2008. "Thermo-chemical routes for hydrogen rich gas from biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(7), pages 1909-1927, September.
    9. Lee, Seungro & Shin, Cheol Hee & Choi, Sun & Kwon, Oh Chae, 2018. "Characteristics of NOx emissions of counterflow nonpremixed water-laden methane/air flames," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 523-535.
    10. Menegaki, Angeliki N. & Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P., 2015. "Rich enough to go renewable, but too early to leave fossil energy?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1465-1477.
    11. Ji, Guozhao & Zhao, Ming & Wang, Geoff, 2018. "Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a sorption-enhanced palladium membrane reactor for enhancing hydrogen production from methane steam reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 884-895.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sirui Tong & Bin Miao & Lan Zhang & Siew Hwa Chan, 2022. "Decarbonizing Natural Gas: A Review of Catalytic Decomposition and Carbon Formation Mechanisms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Msheik, Malek & Rodat, Sylvain & Abanades, Stéphane, 2022. "Experimental comparison of solar methane pyrolysis in gas-phase and molten-tin bubbling tubular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Fan, Liyuan & Li, Chao'en & van Biert, Lindert & Zhou, Shou-Han & Tabish, Asif Nadeem & Mokhov, Anatoli & Aravind, Purushothaman Vellayani & Cai, Weiwei, 2022. "Advances on methane reforming in solid oxide fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Iliya Krastev Iliev & Antonina Andreevna Filimonova & Andrey Alexandrovich Chichirov & Natalia Dmitrievna Chichirova & Alexander Vadimovich Pechenkin & Artem Sergeevich Vinogradov, 2023. "Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Combined Heat and Power Systems with SOFCs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Siavashi, Majid & Hosseini, Farzad & Talesh Bahrami, Hamid Reza, 2021. "A new design with preheating and layered porous ceramic for hydrogen production through methane steam reforming process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Chen, Zong & Zhang, Rongjun & Xia, Guofu & Wu, Yu & Li, Hongwei & Sun, Zhao & Sun, Zhiqiang, 2021. "Vacuum promoted methane decomposition for hydrogen production with carbon separation: Parameter optimization and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siavashi, Majid & Hosseini, Farzad & Talesh Bahrami, Hamid Reza, 2021. "A new design with preheating and layered porous ceramic for hydrogen production through methane steam reforming process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Burra, K.G. & Hussein, M.S. & Amano, R.S. & Gupta, A.K., 2016. "Syngas evolutionary behavior during chicken manure pyrolysis and air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 408-415.
    3. Aubaid Ullah & Nur Awanis Hashim & Mohamad Fairus Rabuni & Mohd Usman Mohd Junaidi, 2023. "A Review on Methanol as a Clean Energy Carrier: Roles of Zeolite in Improving Production Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, February.
    4. Chutichai, Bhawasut & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2015. "Parametric analysis of a circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifier for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 406-413.
    5. Fugang Zhu & Laihong Shen & Pengcheng Xu & Haoran Yuan & Ming Hu & Jingwei Qi & Yong Chen, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of an Improved Updraft Biomass Gasifier Based on Aspen Plus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Su, Hongcai & Yan, Mi & Wang, Shurong, 2022. "Recent advances in supercritical water gasification of biowaste catalyzed by transition metal-based catalysts for hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Wachter, Philipp & Gaber, Christian & Demuth, Martin & Hochenauer, Christoph, 2020. "Experimental investigation of tri-reforming on a stationary, recuperative TCR-reformer applied to an oxy-fuel combustion of natural gas, using a Ni-catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Inbamrung, Piyanut & Sornchamni, Thana & Prapainainar, Chaiwat & Tungkamani, Sabaithip & Narataruksa, Phavanee & Jovanovic, Goran N., 2018. "Modeling of a square channel monolith reactor for methane steam reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 383-400.
    9. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    10. Tonini, Davide & Vadenbo, Carl & Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard, 2017. "Priority of domestic biomass resources for energy: Importance of national environmental targets in a climate perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 295-309.
    11. Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman & Zaman, Khalid & Zhang, Yu, 2016. "The relationship between energy-resource depletion, climate change, health resources and the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from the panel of selected developed countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 468-477.
    12. José Juan Alvarado Flores & Jorge Víctor Alcaraz Vera & María Liliana Ávalos Rodríguez & Luis Bernardo López Sosa & José Guadalupe Rutiaga Quiñones & Luís Fernando Pintor Ibarra & Francisco Márquez Mo, 2022. "Analysis of Pyrolysis Kinetic Parameters Based on Various Mathematical Models for More than Twenty Different Biomasses: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    14. Smoliński, A. & Howaniec, N. & Stańczyk, K., 2011. "A comparative experimental study of biomass, lignite and hard coal steam gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1836-1842.
    15. Frazer Musonda & Markus Millinger & Daniela Thrän, 2020. "Greenhouse Gas Abatement Potentials and Economics of Selected Biochemicals in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    17. Cai, Tao & Zhao, Dan & Chan, Siew Hwa & Shahsavari, Mohammad, 2022. "Tailoring reduced mechanisms for predicting flame propagation and ignition characteristics in ammonia and ammonia/hydrogen mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    18. Yevheniia Ziabina & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2020. "The Green Deal Policy for Renewable Energy: A Bibliometric Analysis," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 3(4), pages 147-168, October.
    19. Wu, Fang-Hsien & Chen, Guan-Bang, 2020. "Numerical study of hydrogen peroxide enhancement of ammonia premixed flames," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    20. Jin, Gong & Iwaki, Hiroyuki & Arai, Norio & Kitagawa, Kuniyuki, 2005. "Study on the gasification of wastepaper/carbon dioxide catalyzed by molten carbonate salts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1192-1203.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Steam methane reforming; H2 production; Reaction pathways; Intermediate species;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:207:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220314031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.