IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v219y2008i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis from a coupled 3-PG and soil organic matter decomposition model

Author

Listed:
  • Xenakis, Georgios
  • Ray, Duncan
  • Mencuccini, Maurizio

Abstract

3-PG [Landsberg, J.J., Waring, R.H., 1997. A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. Forest Ecol. Manage. 95, 209–228] is a process-based model using simplified physiological concepts such as light use efficiency, a constant ratio between net and gross primary production and a simple stand nutritional status parameter. This last parameter is commonly adjusted manually to fit observations, based on data from field surveys. It has been shown that nutritional status has a significant effect on estimated gross and net productivity and it has been suggested that the introduction of a soil sub-model could overcome such problems. This paper introduces a soil organic matter decomposition model within the routines of 3-PG. ICBM/2N (Introductory Carbon Balance Model [Andrén, O., Kätterer, T., 1997. ICBM: the introductory carbon balance model for exploration of soil carbon balance. Ecol. Appl. 7, 1226–1236]) was chosen because it operates at a level of complexity similar to 3-PG. The new model 3-PGN (3-PG Nitrogen) includes three soil carbon and three soil nitrogen pools with eleven additional parameters. This approach provides a new way to account for soil nutritional status within 3-PGN by introducing a fertility rating that varies over the life of a stand. We present the integrated model and describe the basic concepts of the integration. The model has been calibrated and tested for commercial plantations of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Scotland. An uncertainty analysis was performed based on a Bayesian framework using Monte Carlo simulations and a sensitivity analysis to understand the model’s feedbacks and interactions between parameters and outputs. The results show that the least uncertain parameters were the most sensitive, having the greatest effect on many of 3-PGN’s outputs, including quantum yield efficiency, specific leaf area and foliage:stem biomass partitioning ratio. Although the soil sub-model had no direct effect on productivity, strong non-linear relationships were found between many of the soil parameters and 3-PGN outputs. Root turnover rate was found to be the most uncertain parameter, whereas the ratio of net to gross primary production was the least. Finally, through the validation procedure it was shown that 3-PG’s self-thinning routine may cause problems when predicting the number of stems in stands with low fertility.

Suggested Citation

  • Xenakis, Georgios & Ray, Duncan & Mencuccini, Maurizio, 2008. "Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis from a coupled 3-PG and soil organic matter decomposition model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:219:y:2008:i:1:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008003694
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben D. MacArthur & Richard O. C. Oreffo, 2005. "Bridging the gap," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7021), pages 19-19, January.
    2. Svensson, Magnus & Jansson, Per-Erik & Gustafsson, David & Kleja, Dan Berggren & Langvall, Ola & Lindroth, Anders, 2008. "Bayesian calibration of a model describing carbon, water and heat fluxes for a Swedish boreal forest stand," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 331-344.
    3. Federico Magnani & Maurizio Mencuccini & Marco Borghetti & Paul Berbigier & Frank Berninger & Sylvain Delzon & Achim Grelle & Pertti Hari & Paul G. Jarvis & Pasi Kolari & Andrew S. Kowalski & Harry La, 2007. "The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7146), pages 849-851, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nölte, Anja & Yousefpour, Rasoul & Hanewinkel, Marc, 2020. "Changes in sessile oak (Quercus petraea) productivity under climate change by improved leaf phenology in the 3-PG model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    2. Collalti, Alessio & Perugini, Lucia & Santini, Monia & Chiti, Tommaso & Nolè, Angelo & Matteucci, Giorgio & Valentini, Riccardo, 2014. "A process-based model to simulate growth in forests with complex structure: Evaluation and use of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model in a deciduous forest in Central Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 362-378.
    3. Turley, Marianne C. & Ford, E. David, 2009. "Definition and calculation of uncertainty in ecological process models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(17), pages 1968-1983.
    4. Bagnara, Maurizio & Van Oijen, Marcel & Cameron, David & Gianelle, Damiano & Magnani, Federico & Sottocornola, Matteo, 2018. "Bayesian calibration of simple forest models with multiplicative mathematical structure: A case study with two Light Use Efficiency models in an alpine forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 371(C), pages 90-100.
    5. Gupta, Rajit & Sharma, Laxmi Kant, 2019. "The process-based forest growth model 3-PG for use in forest management: A review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 55-73.
    6. Lessa Derci Augustynczik, Andrey & Yousefpour, Rasoul, 2021. "Assessing the synergistic value of ecosystem services in European beech forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. Adhikari, Arjun & White, Joseph D., 2016. "Climate change impacts on regenerating shrubland productivity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 211-220.
    8. Yousefpour, Rasoul & You, Bin & Hanewinkel, Marc, 2019. "Simulation of extreme storm effects on regional forest soil carbon stock," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 399(C), pages 39-53.
    9. Pretzsch, Hans & Forrester, David I. & Rötzer, Thomas, 2015. "Representation of species mixing in forest growth models. A review and perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 276-292.
    10. Bagnara, Maurizio & Sottocornola, Matteo & Cescatti, Alessandro & Minerbi, Stefano & Montagnani, Leonardo & Gianelle, Damiano & Magnani, Federico, 2015. "Bayesian optimization of a light use efficiency model for the estimation of daily gross primary productivity in a range of Italian forest ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 57-66.
    11. Forrester, David I. & Tang, Xiaolu, 2016. "Analysing the spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests and the effects of stand density using the 3-PG model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 233-254.
    12. Juston, John & Andrén, Olof & Kätterer, Thomas & Jansson, Per-Erik, 2010. "Uncertainty analyses for calibrating a soil carbon balance model to agricultural field trial data in Sweden and Kenya," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(16), pages 1880-1888.
    13. Wang, Youmei & Liu, Peng & Zhang, Guifen & Yang, Qiaomei & Lu, Jun & Xia, Tao & Peng, Liangcai & Wang, Yanting, 2021. "Cascading of engineered bioenergy plants and fungi sustainable for low-cost bioethanol and high-value biomaterials under green-like biomass processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Si Hong & Jansson, Per-Erik & Kolari, Pasi, 2011. "Modeling seasonal course of carbon fluxes and evapotranspiration in response to low temperature and moisture in a boreal Scots pine ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3103-3119.
    2. Chen, Dianyu & Wang, Xing & Liu, Shouyang & Wang, Youke & Gao, Zhiyong & Zhang, Linlin & Wei, Xinguang & Wei, Xindong, 2015. "Using Bayesian analysis to compare the performance of three evapotranspiration models for rainfed jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) plantations in the Loess Plateau," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 341-357.
    3. Juston, John & Andrén, Olof & Kätterer, Thomas & Jansson, Per-Erik, 2010. "Uncertainty analyses for calibrating a soil carbon balance model to agricultural field trial data in Sweden and Kenya," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(16), pages 1880-1888.
    4. Bagnara, Maurizio & Van Oijen, Marcel & Cameron, David & Gianelle, Damiano & Magnani, Federico & Sottocornola, Matteo, 2018. "Bayesian calibration of simple forest models with multiplicative mathematical structure: A case study with two Light Use Efficiency models in an alpine forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 371(C), pages 90-100.
    5. Chen, Dianyu & Hsu, Kuolin & Duan, Xingwu & Wang, Youke & Wei, Xinguang & Muhammad, Saifullah, 2020. "Bayesian analysis of jujube canopy transpiration models: Does embedding the key environmental factor in Jarvis canopy resistance sub-model always associate with improving transpiration modeling?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Ercan Tomakin, 2014. "Teaching English Tenses (grammar) in the Turkish Texts; A Case of Simple Present Tense: Is?l Maketi Iter," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 115-131, March.
    7. Peter Viggo Jakobsen, 2009. "Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 81-102, January.
    8. Grace Kite, 2014. "Linked in? Software and Information Technology Services in India’s Economic Development," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 9(2), pages 99-119, August.
    9. Spyros Arvanitis & Ursina Kubli & Martin Woerter, 2006. "University-Industry Knowledge Interaction in Switzerland: What University Scientists Think about Co-operation with Private Enterprises," KOF Working papers 06-132, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    10. Falco, Paolo & Zaccagni, Sarah, 2020. "Promoting social distancing in a pandemic: Beyond the good intentions," OSF Preprints a2nys, Center for Open Science.
    11. Stylos, Nikolaos & Vassiliadis, Chris A. & Bellou, Victoria & Andronikidis, Andreas, 2016. "Destination images, holistic images and personal normative beliefs: Predictors of intention to revisit a destination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 40-60.
    12. Anesi, Vincent, 2012. "Secessionism and minority protection in an uncertain world," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 53-61.
    13. Anesi, Vincent, 2012. "Secessionism and minority protection in an uncertain world," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 53-61.
    14. Deribe Assefa Aga & N. Noorderhaven & B. Vallejo, 2018. "Project beneficiary participation and behavioural intentions promoting project sustainability: The mediating role of psychological ownership," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(5), pages 527-546, September.
    15. Saah, David & Patterson, Trista & Buchholz, Thomas & Ganz, David & Albert, David & Rush, Keith, 2014. "Modeling economic and carbon consequences of a shift to wood-based energy in a rural ‘cluster’; a network analysis in southeast Alaska," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 287-298.
    16. Whyte, Sarah & Cartmill, Carrie & Gardezi, Fauzia & Reznick, Richard & Orser, Beverley A. & Doran, Diane & Lingard, Lorelei, 2009. "Uptake of a team briefing in the operating theatre: A Burkean dramatistic analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 1757-1766, December.
    17. Alistair Ross, 2018. "Young Europeans: A New Political Generation?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-24, August.
    18. Ori Haimanko & Michel Breton & Shlomo Weber, 2007. "The stability threshold and two facets of polarization," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 30(3), pages 415-430, March.
    19. Rohner, Dominic & Esteban, Joan & Flamand, Sabine & Morelli, Massimo, 2018. "A Dynamic Theory of Secession," CEPR Discussion Papers 12398, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Manel Jmal Derbel & Mohamed Ali Boujelbene, 2015. "La Conformite Comptabilite-Fiscalite Et La Gestion Des Resultats : Cas Des Entreprises Tunisiennes," Post-Print hal-01188533, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:219:y:2008:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.