IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v169y2023ics0960077923001777.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unraveling the effects of network, direct and indirect reciprocity in online societies

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Zhi-Qiang
  • Wang, Peng
  • Ma, Jun-Chao
  • Zhu, Peican
  • Han, Zhen
  • Podobnik, Boris
  • Stanley, H. Eugene
  • Zhou, Wei-Xing
  • Alfaro-Bittner, Karin
  • Boccaletti, Stefano

Abstract

Network, direct and indirect reciprocity are three widely recognized mechanisms driving and sustaining cooperation, and each one of them is well understood when acting alone. However, these forms of reciprocity are barely found to be isolated from one another in the real circumstances, and it is still unclear which is the specific role played by each form of reciprocity works when they take action in parallel. With a unique data set from online societies, we find that direct and indirect reciprocity are actually moderated by network reciprocity. On the one hand, the cooperation boosting effect of direct and indirect reciprocity is stronger when subjects have more social connections, indicating that network reciprocity facilitates the formation of direct and indirect reciprocal interactions. On the other hand, this effect declines dramatically for upstream indirect reciprocity (also known as generalized reciprocity) and completely disappears for downstream indirect reciprocity (regarding reputation) when social connections are absent, indicating that social links is a pivotal factor in transmitting gratitude and building reputation. Our study deepens, therefore, the understanding of simultaneous effects of different mechanisms on the evolution of cooperation, and provides a fresh framework for empirically disentangling the factors of cooperative actions in real-world networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Zhi-Qiang & Wang, Peng & Ma, Jun-Chao & Zhu, Peican & Han, Zhen & Podobnik, Boris & Stanley, H. Eugene & Zhou, Wei-Xing & Alfaro-Bittner, Karin & Boccaletti, Stefano, 2023. "Unraveling the effects of network, direct and indirect reciprocity in online societies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:169:y:2023:i:c:s0960077923001777
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077923001777
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew R. Sisco & Elke U. Weber, 2019. "Examining charitable giving in real-world online donations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Xuelong Li & Marko Jusup & Zhen Wang & Huijia Li & Lei Shi & Boris Podobnik & H. Eugene Stanley & Shlomo Havlin & Stefano Boccaletti, 2018. "Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(1), pages 30-35, January.
    3. Arun G. Chandrasekhar & Cynthia Kinnan & Horacio Larreguy, 2018. "Social Networks as Contract Enforcement: Evidence from a Lab Experiment in the Field," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 43-78, October.
    4. Lei Xu & Tingting Nian & Luis Cabral, 2018. "What Makes Geeks Tick? A Study of Stack Overflow Careers," Working Papers 18-04, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    5. Youjin Lee & Elizabeth L. Ogburn, 2021. "Network Dependence Can Lead to Spurious Associations and Invalid Inference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(535), pages 1060-1074, July.
    6. Hisashi Ohtsuki & Christoph Hauert & Erez Lieberman & Martin A. Nowak, 2006. "A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 502-505, May.
    7. Martin A. Nowak & Karl Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6685), pages 573-577, June.
    8. Brañas-Garza, Pablo & Cobo-Reyes, Ramón & Espinosa, María Paz & Jiménez, Natalia & Kovárík, Jaromír & Ponti, Giovanni, 2010. "Altruism and social integration," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 249-257, July.
    9. M.A. Nowak & K. Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring/ The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity," Working Papers ir98040, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    10. Coren L. Apicella & Frank W. Marlowe & James H. Fowler & Nicholas A. Christakis, 2012. "Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers," Nature, Nature, vol. 481(7382), pages 497-501, January.
    11. Delia Baldassarri, 2020. "Market integration accounts for local variation in generalized altruism in a nationwide lost-letter experiment," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(6), pages 2858-2863, February.
    12. Martin A. Nowak & Karl Sigmund, 2005. "Evolution of indirect reciprocity," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7063), pages 1291-1298, October.
    13. Alan H. Krakauer, 2005. "Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7029), pages 69-72, March.
    14. Gilbert Roberts & Thomas N. Sherratt, 1998. "Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment," Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6689), pages 175-179, July.
    15. Wouter van den Bos & Eveline A Crone & Rosa Meuwese & Berna Güroğlu, 2018. "Social network cohesion in school classes promotes prosocial behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Benjamin Allen & Gabor Lippner & Yu-Ting Chen & Babak Fotouhi & Naghmeh Momeni & Shing-Tung Yau & Martin A. Nowak, 2017. "Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure," Nature, Nature, vol. 544(7649), pages 227-230, April.
    17. Milena Tsvetkova & Michael W Macy, 2014. "The Social Contagion of Generosity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.
    18. Huck, Steffen & Leutgeb, Johannes & Oprea, Ryan, 2017. "Payoff information hampers the evolution of cooperation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8, pages 1-1.
    19. Daniel Zizzo, 2010. "Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 13(1), pages 75-98, March.
    20. Brañas-Garza, Pablo & Cobo-Reyes, Ramón & Espinosa, María Paz & Jiménez, Natalia & Kovárík, Jaromír & Ponti, Giovanni, 2010. "Altruism and social integration," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 249-257, July.
      • Brañas Garza, Pablo & Cobo Reyes, Ramón & Espinosa Alejos, María Paz & Jiménez, Natalia & Kovarik, Jaromir & Ponti, Giovanni, 2009. "Altruism and Social Integration," DFAEII Working Papers 6414, University of the Basque Country - Department of Foundations of Economic Analysis II.
      • Brañas Garza, Pablo & Cobo Reyes, Ramón & Espinosa Alejos, María Paz & Jiménez, Natalia & Kovarik, Jaromir & Ponti, Giovanni, 2009. "Altruism and Social Integration," IKERLANAK 6414, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I.
    21. David Melamed & Ashley Harrell & Brent Simpson, 2018. "Cooperation, clustering, and assortative mixing in dynamic networks," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(5), pages 951-956, January.
    22. Yuqing Ren & Jilin Chen & John Riedl, 2016. "The Impact and Evolution of Group Diversity in Online Open Collaboration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1668-1686, June.
    23. Lei Xu & Tingting Nian & Luís Cabral, 2020. "What Makes Geeks Tick? A Study of Stack Overflow Careers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 587-604, February.
    24. Knutsson, Mikael & Martinsson, Peter & Persson, Emil & Wollbrant, Conny, 2019. "Gender differences in altruism: Evidence from a natural field experiment on matched donations," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 47-50.
    25. Hirokazu Shirado & Feng Fu & James H. Fowler & Nicholas A. Christakis, 2013. "Quality versus quantity of social ties in experimental cooperative networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8, December.
    26. Wayne E. Baker & Nathaniel Bulkley, 2014. "Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1493-1510, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Della Rossa & Fabio Dercole & Anna Di Meglio, 2020. "Direct Reciprocity and Model-Predictive Strategy Update Explain the Network Reciprocity Observed in Socioeconomic Networks," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Brent Simpson & Bradley Montgomery & David Melamed, 2023. "Reputations for treatment of outgroup members can prevent the emergence of political segregation in cooperative networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Freya Harrison & James Sciberras & Richard James, 2011. "Strength of Social Tie Predicts Cooperative Investment in a Human Social Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-7, March.
    4. Swami Iyer & Timothy Killingback, 2020. "Evolution of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with Assortative Interactions," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, September.
    5. Christian Hilbe & Maria Kleshnina & Kateřina Staňková, 2023. "Evolutionary Games and Applications: Fifty Years of ‘The Logic of Animal Conflict’," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1035-1048, December.
    6. Isamu Okada, 2020. "A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Rezaei, Golriz & Kirley, Michael, 2012. "Dynamic social networks facilitate cooperation in the N-player Prisoner’s Dilemma," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(23), pages 6199-6211.
    8. Kurokawa, Shun, 2019. "How memory cost, switching cost, and payoff non-linearity affect the evolution of persistence," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 174-192.
    9. Inesi, M. Ena & Adams, Gabrielle S. & Gupta, Anurag, 2021. "When it pays to be kind: The allocation of indirect reciprocity within power hierarchies," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 115-126.
    10. Chengzhang Ma & Wei Cao & Wangheng Liu & Rong Gui & Ya Jia, 2013. "Direct Sum Matrix Game with Prisoner's Dilemma and Snowdrift Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    11. Peican Zhu & Xin Hou & Yangming Guo & Jiwei Xu & Jinzhuo Liu, 2021. "Investigating the effects of updating rules on cooperation by incorporating interactive diversity," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(2), pages 1-8, February.
    12. Chen, Wei & Wu, Te & Li, Zhiwu & Wang, Long, 2016. "Friendship-based partner switching promotes cooperation in heterogeneous populations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 443(C), pages 192-199.
    13. Dhillon, Amrita & Peeters, Ronald & Bartrum, Oliver & Yüksel, Ayşe Müge, 2020. "Hiring an employee’s friends is good for business: Overcoming moral hazard with social networks," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Erkut, Hande & Reuben, Ernesto, 2023. "Social networks and organizational helping behavior: Experimental evidence from the helping game," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2023-203, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Guan, Kaixuan & Chen, Yuyou & Zheng, Wanjun & Zeng, Lulu & Ye, Hang, 2022. "Costly signals can facilitate cooperation and punishment in the prisoner’s dilemma," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 605(C).
    16. Jorge M Pacheco & Flávio L Pinheiro & Francisco C Santos, 2009. "Population Structure Induces a Symmetry Breaking Favoring the Emergence of Cooperation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-7, December.
    17. Du, Faqi & Fu, Feng, 2013. "Quantifying the impact of noise on macroscopic organization of cooperation in spatial games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 35-44.
    18. Faqi Du & Feng Fu, 2011. "Partner Selection Shapes the Strategic and Topological Evolution of Cooperation," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 354-369, September.
    19. Charness, Gary & Du, Ninghua & Yang, Chun-Lei, 2011. "Trust and trustworthiness reputations in an investment game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 361-375, June.
    20. Andrew W. Bausch, 2014. "Evolving intergroup cooperation," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 369-393, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:169:y:2023:i:c:s0960077923001777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.