IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v313y2022ics0306261922000903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis of factors relevant to extreme imbalance between procurement plans and actual demand: Case study of the Japanese electricity market

Author

Listed:
  • Kaneko, Nanae
  • Fujimoto, Yu
  • Hayashi, Yasuhiro

Abstract

In a liberalized power system, operators control the power system to compensate for imbalances, which are the differences between the scheduled power procurement in electricity markets and the actual power supply. Interpreting the influence of factors that affect extremely large imbalances (i.e., extreme imbalance events) enables power system operators to implement appropriate system operation plans. Conventionally, such imbalance analysis has focused only on a limited number of factors and described variation in imbalance by utilizing highly interpretable statistical models, assuming that the probability of imbalance events varies monotonically with changes in those factors. In particular, sensitivity analysis of such models can be a powerful tool to support the decision-making of system operators. However, when dealing with the increasingly complex behavior of markets involving many actors, a flexible statistical analysis framework is required to identify informative factors among the various observable quantities, and to describe nonmonotonic relationships when essentially necessary. This study focuses on the statistical behavior of the odds ratio of the extreme imbalance events by concentrating on an inherently large number of explanatory variables. The authors propose a model-based approach using a class of partially linear additive models and a variable selection method to reveal the statistical relationships between the relevant variables and extreme imbalance events. The framework further provides an analysis scheme to determine the response sensitivity of relevant variables to the odds ratio of extreme imbalance events. The usefulness of the framework was demonstrated by applying the approach to a real-world dataset collected in the Japanese electricity market system. The results show that the proposed approach based on partially linear additive models works well to describe the extreme imbalance events; the constructed models derive the interpretable sensitivity curves to clarify the impact of informative variables to extreme events, while identifying monotonicity/nonmonotonicity among variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaneko, Nanae & Fujimoto, Yu & Hayashi, Yasuhiro, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis of factors relevant to extreme imbalance between procurement plans and actual demand: Case study of the Japanese electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:313:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922000903
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922000903
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chattopadhyay, Deb, 2014. "Modelling renewable energy impact on the electricity market in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 9-22.
    2. Keita Honjo & Hiroto Shiraki & Shuichi Ashina, 2018. "Dynamic linear modeling of monthly electricity demand in Japan: Time variation of electricity conservation effect," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Miller, Reid & Golab, Lukasz & Rosenberg, Catherine, 2017. "Modelling weather effects for impact analysis of residential time-of-use electricity pricing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 534-546.
    4. Goodarzi, Shadi & Perera, H. Niles & Bunn, Derek, 2019. "The impact of renewable energy forecast errors on imbalance volumes and electricity spot prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    5. René Aïd & P. Gruet & H. Pham, 2016. "An optimal trading problem in intraday electricity markets," Post-Print hal-01609481, HAL.
    6. Al-Garni, Ahmed Z. & Zubair, Syed M. & Nizami, Javeed S., 1994. "A regression model for electric-energy-consumption forecasting in Eastern Saudi Arabia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 19(10), pages 1043-1049.
    7. Nantian Huang & Guobo Lu & Dianguo Xu, 2016. "A Permutation Importance-Based Feature Selection Method for Short-Term Electricity Load Forecasting Using Random Forest," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Fujimi, Toshio & Chang, Stephanie E., 2014. "Adaptation to electricity crisis: Businesses in the 2011 Great East Japan triple disaster," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 447-457.
    9. Francesco Lisi and Enrico Edoli, 2018. "Analyzing and Forecasting Zonal Imbalance Signs in the Italian Electricity Market," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 5).
    10. Bueno-Lorenzo, Miriam & Moreno, M. Ángeles & Usaola, Julio, 2013. "Analysis of the imbalance price scheme in the Spanish electricity market: A wind power test case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1010-1019.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaneko, Nanae & Fujimoto, Yu & Kabe, Satoshi & Hayashida, Motonari & Hayashi, Yasuhiro, 2020. "Sparse modeling approach for identifying the dominant factors affecting situation-dependent hourly electricity demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Goodarzi, Shadi & Perera, H. Niles & Bunn, Derek, 2019. "The impact of renewable energy forecast errors on imbalance volumes and electricity spot prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Sinan Deng & John Inekwe & Vladimir Smirnov & Andrew Wait & Chao Wang, 2023. "Machine Learning and Deep Learning Forecasts of Electricity Imbalance Prices," Working Papers 2023-03, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    4. Micha{l} Narajewski & Florian Ziel, 2020. "Ensemble Forecasting for Intraday Electricity Prices: Simulating Trajectories," Papers 2005.01365, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    5. Narajewski, Michał & Ziel, Florian, 2020. "Ensemble forecasting for intraday electricity prices: Simulating trajectories," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    6. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Yilmaz, Berna N., 2021. "The impact of variable renewable energy technologies on electricity markets: An analysis of the Turkish balancing market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Marcel Kremer & Rüdiger Kiesel & Florentina Paraschiv, 2020. "Intraday Electricity Pricing of Night Contracts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Eicke, Anselm & Ruhnau, Oliver & Hirth, Lion, 2021. "Electricity balancing as a market equilibrium," EconStor Preprints 233852, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. Billé, Anna Gloria & Gianfreda, Angelica & Del Grosso, Filippo & Ravazzolo, Francesco, 2023. "Forecasting electricity prices with expert, linear, and nonlinear models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 570-586.
    10. Benedikt Finnah, 2022. "Optimal bidding functions for renewable energies in sequential electricity markets," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Wen-Ze Wu & Chong Liu & Wanli Xie & Mark Goh & Tao Zhang, 2023. "Predictive analysis of the industrial water-waste-energy system using an optimised grey approach: A case study in China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1639-1656, August.
    12. Y, Kiguchi & Y, Heo & M, Weeks & R, Choudhary, 2019. "Predicting intra-day load profiles under time-of-use tariffs using smart meter data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 959-970.
    13. Christopher Kath & Florian Ziel, 2018. "The value of forecasts: Quantifying the economic gains of accurate quarter-hourly electricity price forecasts," Papers 1811.08604, arXiv.org.
    14. Zhou, P. & Jin, R.Y. & Fan, L.W., 2016. "Reliability and economic evaluation of power system with renewables: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 537-547.
    15. Mohanty, Sthitapragyan & Patra, Prashanta K. & Sahoo, Sudhansu S. & Mohanty, Asit, 2017. "Forecasting of solar energy with application for a growing economy like India: Survey and implication," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 539-553.
    16. Batalla-Bejerano, Joan & Costa-Campi, Maria Teresa & Trujillo-Baute, Elisa, 2016. "Collateral effects of liberalisation: Metering, losses, load profiles and cost settlement in Spain’s electricity system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 421-431.
    17. Ricardo Vazquez & Hortensia Amaris & Monica Alonso & Gregorio Lopez & Jose Ignacio Moreno & Daniel Olmeda & Javier Coca, 2017. "Assessment of an Adaptive Load Forecasting Methodology in a Smart Grid Demonstration Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Radhi, Hassan & Sharples, Stephen, 2013. "Quantifying the domestic electricity consumption for air-conditioning due to urban heat islands in hot arid regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 371-380.
    19. Thomas Kuppelwieser & David Wozabal, 2023. "Intraday power trading: toward an arms race in weather forecasting?," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(1), pages 57-83, March.
    20. Kath, Christopher & Ziel, Florian, 2018. "The value of forecasts: Quantifying the economic gains of accurate quarter-hourly electricity price forecasts," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 411-423.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:313:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922000903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.