IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v202y2017icp335-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective pinch analysis for power system planning

Author

Listed:
  • Krishna Priya, G.S.
  • Bandyopadhyay, Santanu

Abstract

Given the rising levels of greenhouse gases and the dependence of power generation on fossil fuels, power system planning with emission constraint is of crucial importance. The objective of emission constrained power sector planning is to identify an optimal energy mix, capable of supplying the required amount of electrical energy while simultaneously keeping emissions within a predefined limit. Cost minimisation is the common objective in power sector planning. Additionally, the choice of one power plant over another involves considering a large number of social, environmental, and economic factors. A multi-objective approach is better suited to address such a complex problem. In this paper, Pinch Analysis, a single objective optimisation method, is modified to address multi-objective problems. It is then applied to simultaneously minimise the land footprint, water footprint, and capital cost associated with energy generation for the Indian power sector. A graphical solution space containing all Pareto optimal solutions for a three-objective problem is also presented. It is seen that for India, the energy mix is dominated by photovoltaic and carbon capture enabled coal power plants. The energy mix for least water footprint contains only photovoltaic power plants while that for least land footprint has a mix of wind, nuclear, small hydel, photovoltaic and biomass. Capital investment is the minimum when biomass and nuclear power plants, along with carbon capture enabled coal plants supply the demand, making biomass the only renewable to feature in the cost optimal mix. Existing coal power plants continue to supply over 35% of the energy requirements for the entire solution space. The overall results highlight the importance of solar PV and carbon capture technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Krishna Priya, G.S. & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2017. "Multi-objective pinch analysis for power system planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 335-347.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:202:y:2017:i:c:p:335-347
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917306876
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banerjee, Rangan, 2006. "Comparison of options for distributed generation in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 101-111, January.
    2. Nouni, M.R. & Mullick, S.C. & Kandpal, T.C., 2008. "Providing electricity access to remote areas in India: An approach towards identifying potential areas for decentralized electricity supply," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 1187-1220, June.
    3. Atkins, Martin J. & Morrison, Andrew S. & Walmsley, Michael R.W., 2010. "Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis (CEPA) for emissions reduction in the New Zealand electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 982-987, March.
    4. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J., 2015. "Achieving 33% renewable electricity generation by 2020 in California," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 260-269.
    5. Mahbub, Md Shahriar & Cozzini, Marco & Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Alberti, Fabrizio, 2016. "Combining multi-objective evolutionary algorithms and descriptive analytical modelling in energy scenario design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 140-151.
    6. Ren, Hongbo & Zhou, Weisheng & Nakagami, Ken'ichi & Gao, Weijun & Wu, Qiong, 2010. "Multi-objective optimization for the operation of distributed energy systems considering economic and environmental aspects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 3642-3651, December.
    7. Harkin, Trent & Hoadley, Andrew & Hooper, Barry, 2012. "Using multi-objective optimisation in the design of CO2 capture systems for retrofit to coal power stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 228-235.
    8. Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2014. "Targeting for carbon sequestration retrofit planning in the power generation sector for multi-period problems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 477-487.
    9. Crilly, Damien & Zhelev, Toshko, 2008. "Emissions targeting and planning: An application of CO2 emissions pinch analysis (CEPA) to the Irish electricity generation sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1498-1507.
    10. Priya, G.S. Krishna & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2017. "Multiple objectives Pinch Analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 128-141.
    11. Dufo-López, Rodolfo & Bernal-Agustín, José L. & Yusta-Loyo, José M. & Domínguez-Navarro, José A. & Ramírez-Rosado, Ignacio J. & Lujano, Juan & Aso, Ismael, 2011. "Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of stand-alone PV–wind–diesel systems with batteries storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4033-4041.
    12. Lee, Sin Cherng & Sum Ng, Denny Kok & Yee Foo, Dominic Chwan & Tan, Raymond R., 2009. "Extended pinch targeting techniques for carbon-constrained energy sector planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 60-67, January.
    13. Alam Hossain Mondal, Md. & Mathur, Jyotirmay & Denich, Manfred, 2011. "Impacts of CO2 emission constraints on technology selection and energy resources for power generation in Bangladesh," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 2043-2050, April.
    14. Pekala, Lukasz M. & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Jezowski, Jacek M., 2010. "Optimal energy planning models with carbon footprint constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(6), pages 1903-1910, June.
    15. Prebeg, Pero & Gasparovic, Goran & Krajacic, Goran & Duic, Neven, 2016. "Long-term energy planning of Croatian power system using multi-objective optimization with focus on renewable energy and integration of electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1493-1507.
    16. Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R. & Ng, Denny K.S., 2008. "Carbon and footprint-constrained energy planning using cascade analysis technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1480-1488.
    17. Muis, Z.A. & Hashim, H. & Manan, Z.A. & Taha, F.M. & Douglas, P.L., 2010. "Optimal planning of renewable energy-integrated electricity generation schemes with CO2 reduction target," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 2562-2570.
    18. Fthenakis, Vasilis & Kim, Hyung Chul, 2009. "Land use and electricity generation: A life-cycle analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1465-1474, August.
    19. Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2007. "Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1422-1429.
    20. Watcharejyothin, Mayurachat & Shrestha, Ram M., 2009. "Regional energy resource development and energy security under CO2 emission constraint in the greater Mekong sub-region countries (GMS)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4428-4441, November.
    21. Shrestha, Ram M. & O.P. Marpaung, Charles, 2002. "Supply- and demand-side effects of power sector planning with CO2 mitigation constraints in a developing country," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 271-286.
    22. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S. & Kopanos, Georgios M. & Pistikopoulos, Efstratios N. & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2014. "A spatial multi-period long-term energy planning model: A case study of the Greek power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 456-482.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Shuai & Liu, Linlin & Zhang, Lei & Zhuang, Yu & Du, Jian, 2018. "An optimization model for carbon capture utilization and storage supply chain: A case study in Northeastern China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 194-206.
    2. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2023. "Green hydrogen production from decarbonized biomass gasification: An integrated techno-economic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Ifaei, Pouya & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2021. "Smart supply-side management of optimal hydro reservoirs using the water/energy nexus concept: A hydropower pinch analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    4. Mitavachan Hiremath & Peter Viebahn & Sascha Samadi, 2021. "An Integrated Comparative Assessment of Coal-Based Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Vis-à-Vis Renewable Energies in India’s Low Carbon Electricity Transition Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    5. Jui-Yuan Lee & Han-Fu Lin, 2019. "Multi-Footprint Constrained Energy Sector Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    6. de Lira Quaresma, Ana Carolina & Francisco, Flávio S. & Pessoa, Fernando L.P. & Queiroz, Eduardo M., 2018. "Carbon emission reduction in the Brazilian electricity sector using Carbon Sources Diagram," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 134-150.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jui-Yuan Lee & Han-Fu Lin, 2019. "Multi-Footprint Constrained Energy Sector Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Lee, Jui-Yuan, 2017. "A multi-period optimisation model for planning carbon sequestration retrofits in the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 12-20.
    3. Rok Gomilšek & Lidija Čuček & Marko Homšak & Raymond R. Tan & Zdravko Kravanja, 2020. "Carbon Emissions Constrained Energy Planning for Aluminum Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Lopez, Neil Stephen A. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2021. "Optimizing regional electricity trading with Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. de Lira Quaresma, Ana Carolina & Francisco, Flávio S. & Pessoa, Fernando L.P. & Queiroz, Eduardo M., 2018. "Carbon emission reduction in the Brazilian electricity sector using Carbon Sources Diagram," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 134-150.
    6. Nair, Purusothmn Nair S Bhasker & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2022. "Extended graphical approach for the implementation of energy-consuming negative emission technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Yu, Dongwei & Tan, Hongwei, 2016. "Application of ‘potential carbon’ in energy planning with carbon emission constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 363-369.
    8. Tan, Raymond R., 2011. "A general source-sink model with inoperability constraints for robust energy sector planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3759-3764.
    9. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J. & Kamp, Peter J.J. & Neale, James R., 2014. "Minimising carbon emissions and energy expended for electricity generation in New Zealand through to 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 656-665.
    10. Li, Zhiwei & Jia, Xiaoping & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Minimizing carbon footprint using pinch analysis: The case of regional renewable electricity planning in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1051-1062.
    11. Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2014. "Targeting for carbon sequestration retrofit planning in the power generation sector for multi-period problems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 477-487.
    12. Liang, Sai & Zhang, Tianzhu, 2011. "Managing urban energy system: A case of Suzhou in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2910-2918, May.
    13. Sinha, Rakesh Kumar & Chaturvedi, Nitin Dutt, 2019. "A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Mohd Yahya, Nur Syahira & Ng, Lik Yin & Andiappan, Viknesh, 2021. "Optimisation and planning of biomass supply chain for new and existing power plants based on carbon reduction targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    15. Nair, Purusothmn Nair S. Bhasker & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2021. "A generic algebraic targeting approach for integration of renewable energy sources, CO2 capture and storage and negative emission technologies in carbon-constrained energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Kong, Karen Gah Hie & How, Bing Shen & Lim, Juin Yau & Leong, Wei Dong & Teng, Sin Yong & Ng, Wendy Pei Qin & Moser, Irene & Sunarso, Jaka, 2022. "Shaving electric bills with renewables? A multi-period pinch-based methodology for energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    17. Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Barilea, Ivan U. & Culaba, Alvin B. & Cruz, Jose B., 2012. "A fuzzy multi-regional input–output optimization model for biomass production and trade under resource and footprint constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 154-160.
    18. Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Jia, Xuexiu, 2018. "New directions in the implementation of Pinch Methodology (PM)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 439-468.
    19. Jia, Xiaoping & Xu, Tianshu & Zhang, Yanmei & Li, Zhiwei & Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Wang, Fang, 2023. "An improved multi-period algebraic targeting approach to low carbon energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    20. Atkins, Martin J. & Morrison, Andrew S. & Walmsley, Michael R.W., 2010. "Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis (CEPA) for emissions reduction in the New Zealand electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 982-987, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:202:y:2017:i:c:p:335-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.