IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v175y2016icp40-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical peak electricity pricing for sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yong
  • Li, Lin

Abstract

Critical peak pricing (CPP) is an electricity demand response technology that has great potential to lower the electricity cost and eliminate the need for more GHG emitting power plants. Many utilities start to offer CPP as the default electric service for industrial customers in their market design. When a manufacturing customer defaults to CPP, it is vital to understand what it is and how it will influence their energy budget and facility operations. In addition, given the option to opt-out to a time-of-use (TOU) rate, it is not always easy to tell whether the switch will result in higher bills or more GHG emissions. These questions will be answered in this paper. Specifically, we will model and compare both CPP and TOU rates to gain more accurate knowledge regarding annual electric costs and GHG emissions. With these results, manufacturing enterprises will be able to make more informed decisions on which service to choose and how to use electricity while fulfilling their role for sustainability by enrolling. The case study results show that for industrial customers with production flexibility, with proper rescheduling of electric use, they can save money by adopting CPP, while contributing to reducing GHG emissions. The savings on the annual electric bill can be 30.45% with a simultaneous GHG emissions reduction of 5.63% for an average industrial customer.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yong & Li, Lin, 2016. "Critical peak electricity pricing for sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and case studies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 40-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:175:y:2016:i:c:p:40-53
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916305566
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bardazzi, Rossella & Oropallo, Filippo & Pazienza, Maria Grazia, 2015. "Do manufacturing firms react to energy prices? Evidence from Italy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 168-181.
    2. Hahn, Heiko & Meyer-Nieberg, Silja & Pickl, Stefan, 2009. "Electric load forecasting methods: Tools for decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 902-907, December.
    3. Forgo, Ferenc & Fulop, Janos & Prill, Maria, 2005. "Game theoretic models for climate change negotiations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(1), pages 252-267, January.
    4. Cubi, Eduard & Doluweera, Ganesh & Bergerson, Joule, 2015. "Incorporation of electricity GHG emissions intensity variability into building environmental assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 62-69.
    5. Fernandez, Mayela & Li, Lin & Sun, Zeyi, 2013. "“Just-for-Peak” buffer inventory for peak electricity demand reduction of manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 178-184.
    6. Sharma, Konark & Mohan Saini, Lalit, 2015. "Performance analysis of smart metering for smart grid: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 720-735.
    7. Cappers, Peter & Goldman, Charles & Kathan, David, 2010. "Demand response in U.S. electricity markets: Empirical evidence," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1526-1535.
    8. Slomp, Jannes & Suresh, Nallan C., 2005. "The shift team formation problem in multi-shift manufacturing operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(3), pages 708-728, September.
    9. O׳Connell, Niamh & Pinson, Pierre & Madsen, Henrik & O׳Malley, Mark, 2014. "Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 686-699.
    10. Herter, Karen & McAuliffe, Patrick & Rosenfeld, Arthur, 2007. "An exploratory analysis of California residential customer response to critical peak pricing of electricity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 25-34.
    11. Ericson, Torgeir, 2011. "Households' self-selection of dynamic electricity tariffs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2541-2547, July.
    12. Baker, Erin & Solak, Senay, 2011. "Climate change and optimal energy technology R&D policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 442-454, September.
    13. Depuru, Soma Shekara Sreenadh Reddy & Wang, Lingfeng & Devabhaktuni, Vijay, 2011. "Smart meters for power grid: Challenges, issues, advantages and status," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2736-2742, August.
    14. Gahm, Christian & Denz, Florian & Dirr, Martin & Tuma, Axel, 2016. "Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 744-757.
    15. Moghaddam, M. Parsa & Abdollahi, A. & Rashidinejad, M., 2011. "Flexible demand response programs modeling in competitive electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(9), pages 3257-3269.
    16. Herter, Karen & Wayland, Seth, 2010. "Residential response to critical-peak pricing of electricity: California evidence," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1561-1567.
    17. Wang, Jianhui & Bloyd, Cary N. & Hu, Zhaoguang & Tan, Zhongfu, 2010. "Demand response in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1592-1597.
    18. Nelson, James & Johnston, Josiah & Mileva, Ana & Fripp, Matthias & Hoffman, Ian & Petros-Good, Autumn & Blanco, Christian & Kammen, Daniel M., 2012. "High-resolution modeling of the western North American power system demonstrates low-cost and low-carbon futures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 436-447.
    19. Lagodimos, A. G. & Leopoulos, V., 2000. "Greedy heuristic algorithms for manpower shift planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 95-106, October.
    20. Wang, Yong & Li, Lin, 2014. "Time-of-use based electricity cost of manufacturing systems: Modeling and monotonicity analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 246-259.
    21. Wang, Yong & Li, Lin, 2013. "Time-of-use based electricity demand response for sustainable manufacturing systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 233-244.
    22. Georgopoulou, E. & Sarafidis, Y. & Mirasgedis, S. & Zaimi, S. & Lalas, D. P., 2003. "A multiple criteria decision-aid approach in defining national priorities for greenhouse gases emissions reduction in the energy sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 199-215, April.
    23. Wang, Yong & Li, Lin, 2015. "Time-of-use electricity pricing for industrial customers: A survey of U.S. utilities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 89-103.
    24. Woo, C.K. & Li, R. & Shiu, A. & Horowitz, I., 2013. "Residential winter kWh responsiveness under optional time-varying pricing in British Columbia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 288-297.
    25. Herter, Karen, 2007. "Residential implementation of critical-peak pricing of electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2121-2130, April.
    26. Gils, Hans Christian, 2016. "Economic potential for future demand response in Germany – Modeling approach and case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 401-415.
    27. Ahmad Faruqui & Sanem Sergici, 2010. "Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 193-225, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meyabadi, A. Fattahi & Deihimi, M.H., 2017. "A review of demand-side management: Reconsidering theoretical framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 367-379.
    2. Ibtihal Abdelmotteleb & Tomás Gómez & Javier Reneses, 2017. "Evaluation Methodology for Tariff Design under Escalating Penetrations of Distributed Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Cui, Weiwei & Li, Lin, 2018. "A game-theoretic approach to optimize the Time-of-Use pricing considering customer behaviors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 75-88.
    4. Zhang, Yunchao & Islam, Md Monirul & Sun, Zeyi & Yang, Sijia & Dagli, Cihan & Xiong, Haoyi, 2018. "Optimal sizing and planning of onsite generation system for manufacturing in Critical Peaking Pricing demand response program," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 261-267.
    5. Meng, Yan & Fan, Shuai & Shen, Yu & Xiao, Jucheng & He, Guangyu & Li, Zuyi, 2023. "Transmission and distribution network-constrained large-scale demand response based on locational customer directrix load for accommodating renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    6. Todd, Annika & Cappers, Peter & Spurlock, C. Anna & Jin, Ling, 2019. "Spillover as a cause of bias in baseline evaluation methods for demand response programs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 344-357.
    7. Luo, Zhe & Hong, SeungHo & Ding, YueMin, 2019. "A data mining-driven incentive-based demand response scheme for a virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 549-559.
    8. Nezamoddini, Nasim & Wang, Yong, 2017. "Real-time electricity pricing for industrial customers: Survey and case studies in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1023-1037.
    9. Roksana Yasmin & B. M. Ruhul Amin & Rakibuzzaman Shah & Andrew Barton, 2024. "A Survey of Commercial and Industrial Demand Response Flexibility with Energy Storage Systems and Renewable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-41, January.
    10. Saffari, Mohammad & de Gracia, Alvaro & Fernández, Cèsar & Belusko, Martin & Boer, Dieter & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2018. "Optimized demand side management (DSM) of peak electricity demand by coupling low temperature thermal energy storage (TES) and solar PV," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 604-616.
    11. Ibrahim Alotaibi & Mohammed A. Abido & Muhammad Khalid & Andrey V. Savkin, 2020. "A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Smart Grids: A Sustainable Future with Renewable Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-41, November.
    12. An, Xiangxin & Si, Guojin & Xia, Tangbin & Wang, Dong & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2023. "An energy-efficient collaborative strategy of maintenance planning and production scheduling for serial-parallel systems under time-of-use tariffs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    13. Lin, Haiyang & Wang, Qinxing & Wang, Yu & Liu, Yiling & Sun, Qie & Wennersten, Ronald, 2017. "The energy-saving potential of an office under different pricing mechanisms – Application of an agent-based model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 248-258.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meyabadi, A. Fattahi & Deihimi, M.H., 2017. "A review of demand-side management: Reconsidering theoretical framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 367-379.
    2. Wang, Yong & Li, Lin, 2015. "Time-of-use electricity pricing for industrial customers: A survey of U.S. utilities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 89-103.
    3. Woo, C.K. & Sreedharan, P. & Hargreaves, J. & Kahrl, F. & Wang, J. & Horowitz, I., 2014. "A review of electricity product differentiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 262-272.
    4. Yang, Changhui & Meng, Chen & Zhou, Kaile, 2018. "Residential electricity pricing in China: The context of price-based demand response," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2870-2878.
    5. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Takuro Tanaka & Eri Nakamura, 2015. "The Effect of Demand Response on Electricity Consumption in Japan," Discussion Papers 2015-02, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    6. Yan, Xing & Ozturk, Yusuf & Hu, Zechun & Song, Yonghua, 2018. "A review on price-driven residential demand response," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 411-419.
    7. He, Yongxiu & Wang, Bing & Wang, Jianhui & Xiong, Wei & Xia, Tian, 2012. "Residential demand response behavior analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation: The case of Yinchuan in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 230-236.
    8. Y, Kiguchi & Y, Heo & M, Weeks & R, Choudhary, 2019. "Predicting intra-day load profiles under time-of-use tariffs using smart meter data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 959-970.
    9. Tahir, Muhammad Faizan & Chen, Haoyong & Khan, Asad & Javed, Muhammad Sufyan & Cheema, Khalid Mehmood & Laraik, Noman Ali, 2020. "Significance of demand response in light of current pilot projects in China and devising a problem solution for future advancements," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Guo, Peiyang & Li, Victor O.K. & Lam, Jacqueline C.K., 2017. "Smart demand response in China: Challenges and drivers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-10.
    11. Vallés, Mercedes & Bello, Antonio & Reneses, Javier & Frías, Pablo, 2018. "Probabilistic characterization of electricity consumer responsiveness to economic incentives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 296-310.
    12. Cui, Weiwei & Li, Lin, 2018. "A game-theoretic approach to optimize the Time-of-Use pricing considering customer behaviors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 75-88.
    13. Jieyi Kang & David Reiner, 2021. "Machine Learning on residential electricity consumption: Which households are more responsive to weather?," Working Papers EPRG2113, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    14. Konstantin Biel & Christoph H. Glock, 2017. "Prerequisites of efficient decentralized waste heat recovery and energy storage in production planning," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 41-72, January.
    15. Woo, C.K. & Li, R. & Shiu, A. & Horowitz, I., 2013. "Residential winter kWh responsiveness under optional time-varying pricing in British Columbia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 288-297.
    16. Higgins, Andrew & Grozev, George & Ren, Zhengen & Garner, Stephen & Walden, Glenn & Taylor, Michelle, 2014. "Modelling future uptake of distributed energy resources under alternative tariff structures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 455-463.
    17. Li, Lanlan & Gong, Chengzhu & Wang, Deyun & Zhu, Kejun, 2013. "Multi-agent simulation of the time-of-use pricing policy in an urban natural gas pipeline network: A case study of Zhengzhou," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 37-43.
    18. Katz, Jonas & Andersen, Frits Møller & Morthorst, Poul Erik, 2016. "Load-shift incentives for household demand response: Evaluation of hourly dynamic pricing and rebate schemes in a wind-based electricity system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1602-1616.
    19. Makena Coffman & Paul Bernstein & Derek Stenclik & Sherilyn Wee & Aida Arik, 2018. "Integrating Renewable Energy with Time Varying Pricing," Working Papers 2018-6, University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    20. Takanori Ida & Wenjie Wang, 2014. "A Field Experiment on Dynamic Electricity Pricing in Los Alamos:Opt-in Versus Opt-out," Discussion papers e-14-010, Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:175:y:2016:i:c:p:40-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.