IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v110y2013icp104-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic use of the underground in an energy mix plan: Synergies among CO2, CH4 geological storage and geothermal energy. Latium Region case study (Central Italy)

Author

Listed:
  • Procesi, M.
  • Cantucci, B.
  • Buttinelli, M.
  • Armezzani, G.
  • Quattrocchi, F.
  • Boschi, E.

Abstract

In recent decades, the worldwide demand for energy has been increasing, with an associated rise in CO2 emissions being observed. In such conditions, the development of “low carbon energy technologies” and strategic energy-mix plans is necessary, and an evaluation of the underground energy potential may be a useful step in developing these plans. This evaluation involves the synergic development of such technologies as: coal combustion in combination with CO2 geological storage (CCS), natural gas geological storage (CH4-GS) and geothermal energy (GE), especially in densely populated countries, such as Italy.

Suggested Citation

  • Procesi, M. & Cantucci, B. & Buttinelli, M. & Armezzani, G. & Quattrocchi, F. & Boschi, E., 2013. "Strategic use of the underground in an energy mix plan: Synergies among CO2, CH4 geological storage and geothermal energy. Latium Region case study (Central Italy)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 104-131.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:110:y:2013:i:c:p:104-131
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913002675
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kannan, R., 2009. "Uncertainties in key low carbon power generation technologies - Implication for UK decarbonisation targets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(10), pages 1873-1886, October.
    2. L. Pizzino & G. Galli & C. Mancini & F. Quattrocchi & P. Scarlato, 2002. "Natural Gas Hazard (CO 2, 222 Rn) within a Quiescent Volcanic Region and Its Relations with Tectonics: The Case of the Ciampino-Marino Area, Alban Hills Volcano, Italy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 27(3), pages 257-287, November.
    3. Holloway, S., 2005. "Underground sequestration of carbon dioxide—a viable greenhouse gas mitigation option," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 2318-2333.
    4. Buttinelli, M. & Procesi, M. & Cantucci, B. & Quattrocchi, F. & Boschi, E., 2011. "The geo-database of caprock quality and deep saline aquifers distribution for geological storage of CO2 in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2968-2983.
    5. Maldal, T & Tappel, I.M, 2004. "CO2 underground storage for Snøhvit gas field development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1403-1411.
    6. Suekane, Tetsuya & Soukawa, Shingo & Iwatani, Satoshi & Tsushima, Shoji & Hirai, Shuichiro, 2005. "Behavior of supercritical CO2 injected into porous media containing water," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 2370-2382.
    7. Viebahn, Peter & Daniel, Vallentin & Samuel, Höller, 2012. "Integrated assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the German power sector and comparison with the deployment of renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 238-248.
    8. Quattrocchi, Fedora & Boschi, Enzo & Spena, Angelo & Buttinelli, Mauro & Cantucci, Barbara & Procesi, Monia, 2013. "Synergic and conflicting issues in planning underground use to produce energy in densely populated countries, as Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 393-412.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniele Cinti & Monia Procesi & Pier Paolo Poncia, 2018. "Evaluation of the Theoretical Geothermal Potential of Inferred Geothermal Reservoirs within the Vicano–Cimino and the Sabatini Volcanic Districts (Central Italy) by the Application of the Volume Metho," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    3. Cheng Cao & Hejuan Liu & Zhengmeng Hou & Faisal Mehmood & Jianxing Liao & Wentao Feng, 2020. "A Review of CO 2 Storage in View of Safety and Cost-Effectiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-45, January.
    4. Liming Zhang & Zekun Deng & Kai Zhang & Tao Long & Joshua Kwesi Desbordes & Hai Sun & Yongfei Yang, 2019. "Well-Placement Optimization in an Enhanced Geothermal System Based on the Fracture Continuum Method and 0-1 Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Ziabakhsh-Ganji, Zaman & Kooi, Henk, 2014. "Sensitivity of Joule–Thomson cooling to impure CO2 injection in depleted gas reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 434-451.
    6. Gregory Tarteh Mwenketishi & Hadj Benkreira & Nejat Rahmanian, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-42, December.
    7. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    8. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Saeid, Sanaz & Doonechaly, Nima Gholizadeh, 2021. "The fault plane as the main fluid pathway: Geothermal field development options under subsurface and operational uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 927-946.
    9. G. Tamburello & G. Chiodini & G. Ciotoli & M. Procesi & D. Rouwet & L. Sandri & N. Carbonara & C. Masciantonio, 2022. "Global thermal spring distribution and relationship to endogenous and exogenous factors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Xie, Qiyuan & Tu, Ran & Jiang, Xi & Li, Kang & Zhou, Xuejin, 2014. "The leakage behavior of supercritical CO2 flow in an experimental pipeline system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 574-580.
    11. Cui, Guodong & Zhang, Liang & Ren, Bo & Enechukwu, Chioma & Liu, Yanmin & Ren, Shaoran, 2016. "Geothermal exploitation from depleted high temperature gas reservoirs via recycling supercritical CO2: Heat mining rate and salt precipitation effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 837-852.
    12. Cheng, Wen-Long & Li, Tong-Tong & Nian, Yong-Le & Xie, Kun, 2014. "Evaluation of working fluids for geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 238-245.
    13. Zhang, Liang & Ezekiel, Justin & Li, Dexiang & Pei, Jingjing & Ren, Shaoran, 2014. "Potential assessment of CO2 injection for heat mining and geological storage in geothermal reservoirs of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 237-246.
    14. Zhang, Xiaodong & Duncan, Ian J. & Huang, Gordon & Li, Gongchen, 2014. "Identification of management strategies for CO2 capture and sequestration under uncertainty through inexact modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 310-317.
    15. Lenhardt, Nils & Götz, Annette E., 2015. "Geothermal reservoir potential of volcaniclastic settings: The Valley of Mexico, Central Mexico," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 423-429.
    16. Bloemendal, Martin & Jaxa-Rozen, Marc & Olsthoorn, Theo, 2018. "Methods for planning of ATES systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 534-557.
    17. Uchechukwu Nwaiwu & Matthew Leach & Lirong Liu, 2023. "Development of an Improved Decision Support Tool for Geothermal Site Selection in Nigeria Based on Comprehensive Criteria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-28, November.
    18. Justin Ezekiel & Diya Kumbhat & Anozie Ebigbo & Benjamin M. Adams & Martin O. Saar, 2021. "Sensitivity of Reservoir and Operational Parameters on the Energy Extraction Performance of Combined CO 2 -EGR–CPG Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Monia Procesi, 2014. "Geothermal Potential Evaluation for Northern Chile and Suggestions for New Energy Plans," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Chen, Mingjie & Tompson, Andrew F.B. & Mellors, Robert J. & Abdalla, Osman, 2015. "An efficient optimization of well placement and control for a geothermal prospect under geological uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 352-363.
    21. Soubeyran, A. & Rouabhi, A. & Coquelet, C., 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide storage in salt caverns to improve the Power-to-Gas process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1090-1107.
    22. Cui, Guodong & Ren, Shaoran & Rui, Zhenhua & Ezekiel, Justin & Zhang, Liang & Wang, Hongsheng, 2018. "The influence of complicated fluid-rock interactions on the geothermal exploitation in the CO2 plume geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 49-63.
    23. Hofmann, Hannes & Babadagli, Tayfun & Zimmermann, Günter, 2014. "Hot water generation for oil sands processing from enhanced geothermal systems: Process simulation for different hydraulic fracturing scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 524-547.
    24. Juntunen, Jouni K. & Martiskainen, Mari, 2021. "Improving understanding of energy autonomy: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buttinelli, M. & Procesi, M. & Cantucci, B. & Quattrocchi, F. & Boschi, E., 2011. "The geo-database of caprock quality and deep saline aquifers distribution for geological storage of CO2 in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2968-2983.
    2. Tola, Vittorio & Pettinau, Alberto, 2014. "Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1461-1474.
    3. Zhang, Lisong & Zhang, Shiyan & Jiang, Weizhai & Wang, Zhiyuan & Li, Jing & Bian, Yinghui, 2018. "A mechanism of fluid exchange associated to CO2 leakage along activated fault during geologic storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1178-1190.
    4. Xie, Qiyuan & Tu, Ran & Jiang, Xi & Li, Kang & Zhou, Xuejin, 2014. "The leakage behavior of supercritical CO2 flow in an experimental pipeline system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 574-580.
    5. Shafaei, Mohammad Javad & Abedi, Jalal & Hassanzadeh, Hassan & Chen, Zhangxin, 2012. "Reverse gas-lift technology for CO2 storage into deep saline aquifers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 840-849.
    6. Emad A. Al‐Khdheeawi & Stephanie Vialle & Ahmed Barifcani & Mohammad Sarmadivaleh & Stefan Iglauer, 2017. "Influence of CO 2 ‐wettability on CO 2 migration and trapping capacity in deep saline aquifers," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 328-338, April.
    7. Sanna, Aimaro & Dri, Marco & Hall, Matthew R. & Maroto-Valer, Mercedes, 2012. "Waste materials for carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM) – A UK perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 545-554.
    8. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    9. Valentina Bosetti & Laurent Gilotte, 2005. "Carbon Capture and Sequestration: How Much Does this Uncertain Option Affect Near-Term Policy Choices?," Working Papers 2005.86, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    10. Lee, Suh-Young & Lee, Jae-Uk & Lee, In-Beum & Han, Jeehoon, 2017. "Design under uncertainty of carbon capture and storage infrastructure considering cost, environmental impact, and preference on risk," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 725-738.
    11. Kinoshita, Tsuguki & Ohki, Takashi & Yamagata, Yoshiki, 2010. "Woody biomass supply potential for thermal power plants in Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(9), pages 2923-2927, September.
    12. Chaudry, Modassar & Abeysekera, Muditha & Hosseini, Seyed Hamid Reza & Jenkins, Nick & Wu, Jianzhong, 2015. "Uncertainties in decarbonising heat in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 623-640.
    13. Rochedo, Pedro R.R. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2013. "Designing learning curves for carbon capture based on chemical absorption according to the minimum work of separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 383-391.
    14. Zhang, Liang & Ezekiel, Justin & Li, Dexiang & Pei, Jingjing & Ren, Shaoran, 2014. "Potential assessment of CO2 injection for heat mining and geological storage in geothermal reservoirs of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 237-246.
    15. Anita Punia, 2021. "Carbon dioxide sequestration by mines: implications for climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Yong Zeng & Yanpeng Cai & Guohe Huang & Jing Dai, 2011. "A Review on Optimization Modeling of Energy Systems Planning and GHG Emission Mitigation under Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(10), pages 1-33, October.
    17. Yiman Li & Zhonghe Pang, 2017. "Hydrogeochemical characteristics of deep saline aquifers in sedimentary basins in China and implications for CO 2 geological storage with emphasis on total dissolved solids (TDS) and water type," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 53-64, February.
    18. van den Broek, Machteld & Berghout, Niels & Rubin, Edward S., 2015. "The potential of renewables versus natural gas with CO2 capture and storage for power generation under CO2 constraints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1296-1322.
    19. Ashina, Shuichi & Fujino, Junichi & Masui, Toshihiko & Ehara, Tomoki & Hibino, Go, 2012. "A roadmap towards a low-carbon society in Japan using backcasting methodology: Feasible pathways for achieving an 80% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 584-598.
    20. Hu, Haixiang & Li, Xiaochun & Fang, Zhiming & Wei, Ning & Li, Qianshu, 2010. "Small-molecule gas sorption and diffusion in coal: Molecular simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 2939-2944.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:110:y:2013:i:c:p:104-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.