IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/73-10-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nachhaltigkeitskonforme Diskontierung: das Konzept des "Generation Adjusted Discounting"

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Bayer

Abstract

Discounting is crucial for determining the efficiency of policy programmes. However, it has been criticized that discounting prevents sustainable development. It could only be reached if we refrained from discounting entirely. However, the second pillar of sustainable development is not seriously considered for: The needs of currently living generations. We analyze whether there exists a discounting method which is in accordance with sustainability criteria within a utilitarian framework. The Generation Adjusted Discounting (GAD) method is derived and its implications with respect to sustainability are shown. The paper stresses that the GAD is favourable, compared to conventional discounting as well as to not discounting at all, in terms of efficiency and sustainability. Subsequently living generations are then treated equally - a basic condition in a utilitarian framework. Sustainability can be measured by calculating the discount rate differences between (implicit) GAD and conventional discounting. Die Diskontierung ist von zentraler Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung der Effizienz staatlicher Vorhaben. Ihre Anwendung ruft aber auch Kritiker auf den Plan, da sie das Einschwenken auf einen nachhaltigen Wachstumspfad verhindere. Sie plädieren deshalb für den Verzicht auf Diskontierung. Dies steht jedoch im Widerspruch zur zweiten Nachhaltigkeitsbedingung - der Berücksichtigung der Bedürfnisse heute lebender Generationen -, da bei Nichtdiskontierung Opportunitätskosten vernachlässigtwürden. Daraus leitet sich die Frage ab, ob es eine nachhaltigkeitskonforme Diskontierung geben kann und wie sie methodisch verfahren sollte. Mit dem"Generation Adjusted Discounting" (GAD) wird ein solches Verfahren für langfristige, mehrere Generationen betreffende Projekte entwickelt. Es wird gezeigt, dass das GAD eine wesentliche Bedingung für die intertemporale - dem Utilitarismus entstammende - Gleichbehandlung und somit für die Erreichung von Nachhaltigkeitszielen darstellt. Eine Nachhaltigkeitsmessung bei Nutzen-Kosten-Analysen kann dann in Form von Diskontratendifferenzen zwischen (implizitem) GAD und der konventionellenDiskontierung erfolgen.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Bayer, 2004. "Nachhaltigkeitskonforme Diskontierung: das Konzept des "Generation Adjusted Discounting"," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(1), pages 142-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:73-10-10
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.73.1.142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.73.1.142
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.73.1.142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. Stefan Bayer, 2003. "Generation-adjusted discounting in long-term decision-making," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 1133-1149.
    3. Gollier, Christian, 2002. "Discounting an uncertain future," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 149-166, August.
    4. Weitzman, Martin L., 1998. "Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 201-208, November.
    5. William R. Cline, 1992. "Economics of Global Warming, The," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 39, October.
    6. Stefan Bayer & Claudia Kemfert, 2002. "Reaching National Kyoto Targets in Germany and Sustainable Development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 371-390, December.
    7. Schelling, Thomas C, 1995. "Intergenerational discounting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(4-5), pages 395-401.
    8. Konrad Ott, 2003. "Reflections on discounting: some philosophical remarks," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 7-24.
    9. Colin Price, 2003. "Diminishing marginal utility: the respectable case for discounting?," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 117-132.
    10. H. Unnerstall, 2003. "Discounting: reflections on the scientific and ethical dimensions of the debate," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 54-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hahn, W. Andreas & Härtl, Fabian & Irland, Lloyd C. & Kohler, Christoph & Moshammer, Ralf & Knoke, Thomas, 2014. "Financially optimized management planning under risk aversion results in even-flow sustained timber yield," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 30-41.
    2. Stefan Bayer & Jacques Méry, 2009. "Sustainability gaps in municipal solid waste management: a case study for landfills," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 43-69, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Bayer, 2003. "Generelle Nichtdiskontierung als Bedingung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung?," IAW Discussion Papers 13, Institut für Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (IAW).
    2. Price, Colin, 6. "Optimal Rotation under Continually – or Continuously – Declining Discount Rate," Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, issue 42, April.
    3. Riccardo Rebonato & Riccardo Ronzani & Lionel Melin, 2023. "Robust management of climate risk damages," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(3), pages 1-43, September.
    4. Eric Fesselmeyer & Haoming Liu & Alberto Salvo, 2022. "Declining discount rates in Singapore's market for privately developed apartments," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 330-350, March.
    5. Richard S.J. Tol, 2008. "Why Worry About Climate Change? A Research Agenda," Environmental Values, White Horse Press, vol. 17(4), pages 437-470, November.
    6. Hepburn, Cameron & Koundouri, Phoebe & Panopoulou, Ekaterini & Pantelidis, Theologos, 2009. "Social discounting under uncertainty: A cross-country comparison," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 140-150, March.
    7. Roger Fouquet, 2012. "Economics of Energy and Climate Change: Origins, Developments and Growth," Working Papers 2012-08, BC3.
    8. Marc Fleurbaey & Stéphane Zuber, 2012. "Climate policies deserve a negative discount rate," Working Papers halshs-00728193, HAL.
    9. Colin, Price, 2011. "Optimal rotation with declining discount rate," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 307-318, August.
    10. Cameron Hepburn & Greer Gosnell, 2014. "Evaluating impacts in the distant future: cost–benefit analysis, discounting and the alternatives," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz & Eric Neumayer & Matthew Agarwala (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 9, pages 140-159, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Mareike Schad & Jürgen John, 2012. "Towards a social discount rate for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Germany: an exploratory analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(2), pages 127-144, April.
    12. Emilio Padilla, 2002. "Limitations and biases of conventional analysis of climate change. Towards an analysis coherent with sustainable development," Working Papers wp0206, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    13. Davidson, Marc D., 2014. "Zero discounting can compensate future generations for climate damage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 40-47.
    14. Fesselmeyer, Eric & Liu, Haoming & Salvo, Alberto, 2016. "How Do Households Discount over Centuries? Evidence from Singapore's Private Housing Market," IZA Discussion Papers 9862, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Roman Inderst & Eftichios Sartzetakis & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "Technical Report on Sustainability and Competition," DEOS Working Papers 2103, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    16. Stefan Bayer & Jacques Méry, 2009. "Sustainability gaps in municipal solid waste management: a case study for landfills," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 43-69, February.
    17. Price, Colin, 2010. "Low discount rates and insignificant environmental values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1895-1903, August.
    18. Marc D. Davidson, 2012. "Intergenerational Justice: How Reasonable Man Discounts Climate Damage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Scarborough, Helen, 2011. "Intergenerational equity and the social discount rate," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(2), pages 1-14.
    20. Brazee, Richard J., 2018. "Impacts of declining discount rates on optimal harvest age and land expectation values," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 27-38.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:73-10-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.