IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v54y2020i2p628-647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When family dining protects against sweet food consumption… and when it does not

Author

Listed:
  • Marie‐Eve Laporte
  • Sophie Rieunier
  • Geraldine Michel

Abstract

The World Health Organization recommends reducing sugar intake in order to improve one's health. In this spirit, the aim of this research is to test the impact that dining as a family has on the consumption of sweet food and to compare the results with the impact of dining alone or with friends, at home or away. Based on a mixed‐method design combining an experiment with a descriptive survey, the results show that family dining at home fosters healthier eating behavior by restricting sweet food consumption, while dining alone or with friends at home leads more consumption of sweet foods. However, this protective effect of family dining does not hold outside the home. This study helps explain the contradictions in the literature regarding how the presence of others influences food intake. It provides guidance to policy and business stakeholders on ways to reduce sugar consumption and to improve consumers' eating behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie‐Eve Laporte & Sophie Rieunier & Geraldine Michel, 2020. "When family dining protects against sweet food consumption… and when it does not," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 628-647, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:54:y:2020:i:2:p:628-647
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12293
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandra Zingg & Marie-Eve Cousin & Melanie Connor & Michael Siegrist, 2013. "Public risk perception in the total meat supply chain," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(8), pages 1005-1020, September.
    2. Stéphane Debenedetti, 2003. "L'expérience de visite des lieux de loisir : le rôle central des compagnons," Post-Print halshs-00169484, HAL.
    3. Sophie Hieke & Christopher L. Newman, 2015. "The Effects of Nutrition Label Comparison Baselines on Consumers' Food Choices," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 613-626, November.
    4. Judy Harris & Veronica L. Thomas, 2017. "The Influence of Bundling and Caloric Knowledge on Calories Ordered and Purchase Intent," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 113-132, March.
    5. Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, 2009. "Do School Lunches Contribute to Childhood Obesity?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 44(3).
    6. Wallendorf, Melanie & Arnould, Eric J, 1991. ""We Gather Together": Consumption Rituals of Thanksgiving Day," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 13-31, June.
    7. Hart, Phillip M. & Dale, Rick, 2014. "With or without you: The positive and negative influence of retail companions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 780-787.
    8. Scot Burton & Andrea H. Tangari & Elizabeth Howlett & Anna M. Turri, 2014. "How the Perceived Healthfulness of Restaurant Menu Items Influences Sodium and Calorie Misperceptions: Implications for Nutrition Disclosures in Chain Restaurants," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 62-95, March.
    9. Chebat, Jean-Charles & Haj-Salem, Narjes & Oliveira, Sandra, 2014. "Why shopping pals make malls different?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 77-85.
    10. Jing Wang & Rui (Juliet) Zhu & Baba Shiv, 2012. "The Lonely Consumer: Loner or Conformer?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(6), pages 1116-1128.
    11. Newman, Christopher L. & Howlett, Elizabeth & Burton, Scot, 2014. "Implications of fast food restaurant concentration for preschool-aged childhood obesity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1573-1580.
    12. Stéphane Debenedetti, 2003. "L'expérience de visite des lieux de loisirs : Le rôle central des compagnons," Post-Print hal-02022827, HAL.
    13. Isabelle Chalamon & Lydiane Nabec, 2016. "Why Do We Read On-Pack Nutrition Information so Differently? A Typology of Reading Heuristics Based on Food Consumption Goals," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 403-429, July.
    14. Hawley, Luke & Harker, Debra & Harker, Michael, 2010. "A social cognitive approach to tackle inactivity and obesity in young Australians," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 116-120, February.
    15. Sophie Hieke & Charles R. Taylor, 2012. "A Critical Review of the Literature on Nutritional Labeling," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 120-156, March.
    16. Belk, Russell W, 1975. "Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(3), pages 157-164, December.
    17. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1443 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Eve Laporte & Géraldine Michel & Sophie Rieunier, 2017. "Towards a better understanding of eating behaviour through the concept of Perception of Nutritional Risk," Post-Print halshs-02923251, HAL.
    2. Carrington, Michal J. & Neville, Benjamin A. & Whitwell, Gregory J., 2014. "Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2759-2767.
    3. Marie-Eve Laporte & Géraldine Michel & Sophie Rieunier, 2015. "Toward a better understanding of eating-behaviour through the concept of Perception of Nutritional Risk [Mieux comprendre les comportements alimentaires grâce au concept de perception du risque nut," Post-Print hal-02054434, HAL.
    4. Grimmer, Martin & Kilburn, Ashley P. & Miles, Morgan P., 2016. "The effect of purchase situation on realized pro-environmental consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1582-1586.
    5. Shah, Sayed Kifayat & Zhongjun, Tang, 2021. "Elaborating on the consumer’s intention–behavior gap regarding 5G technology: The moderating role of the product market-creation ability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Maltese, Ila & Le Pira, Michela & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Evangelinos, Christos, 2021. "Grocery or @grocery: A stated preference investigation in Rome and Milan," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Lucia-Palacios, Laura & Pérez-López, Raúl & Polo-Redondo, Yolanda, 2018. "Can social support alleviate stress while shopping in crowded retail environments?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 141-150.
    8. Wilken, Robert & Stimmer, Elena & Bürgin, David, 2022. "Should retailers encourage couples to shop together?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Christèle Camelis & Florence Dano & Kiane Goudarzi & Viviane Hamon & Sylvie Llosa, 2013. "The roles of co-clients and their influence on overall satisfaction during the service experience," Post-Print hal-01822880, HAL.
    10. Ksenia Silchenko & Søren Askegaard & Elena Cedrola, 2020. "Three Decades of Research in Health and Food Marketing: A Systematic Review," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 541-580, June.
    11. Wang, Jiawei, 2023. "The relationship between loneliness and consumer shopping channel choice: Evidence from China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Tobias Scholz & Jörn Redler & Sven Pagel, 2021. "Re-designing adaptive selling strategies: the role of different types of shopping companions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 1243-1280, July.
    13. Ricci, Elena Claire & Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2018. "Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 54-65.
    14. Dominici, Andrea & Boncinelli, Fabio & Gerini, Francesca & Marone, Enrico, 2021. "Determinants of online food purchasing: The impact of socio-demographic and situational factors," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. Woodside, Arch G. & Ozcan, Timucin, 2009. "Customer choices of manufacturer versus retailer brands in alternative price and usage contexts," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 100-108.
    16. Buck, Christoph & Horbel, Chris & Kessler, Tim, 2017. "A four-factor framework of consumers' perception of mobile applications in context," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 64, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    17. Madalina Ariton (Balau), 2013. "A Theoretical Framework for Integrating Symbolic and Affective Motivations in the Purchase Decisions of Romanian Car Consumers," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2(32), pages 119-125, September.
    18. Christèle Camelis & Sylvie Llosa & Cécile Maunier, 2015. "Gestion de la satisfaction et de l’insatisfaction des touristes : les apports du modèle Tétraclasse," Post-Print hal-01243401, HAL.
    19. Lunardo, Renaud & Mbengue, Ababacar, 2009. "Perceived control and shopping behavior: The moderating role of the level of utilitarian motivational orientation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 434-441.
    20. Wenzel, Stefanie & Benkenstein, Martin, 2018. "Together always better? The impact of shopping companions and shopping motivation on adolescents' shopping experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 118-126.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:54:y:2020:i:2:p:628-647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.