IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v50y2016i2p403-429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Do We Read On-Pack Nutrition Information so Differently? A Typology of Reading Heuristics Based on Food Consumption Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle Chalamon
  • Lydiane Nabec

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle Chalamon & Lydiane Nabec, 2016. "Why Do We Read On-Pack Nutrition Information so Differently? A Typology of Reading Heuristics Based on Food Consumption Goals," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 403-429, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:50:y:2016:i:2:p:403-429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/joca.12093
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bettman, James R & Luce, Mary Frances & Payne, John W, 1998. "Constructive Consumer Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(3), pages 187-217, December.
    2. Brian Wansink & David R. Just & Collin R. Payne, 2009. "Mindless Eating and Healthy Heuristics for the Irrational," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(2), pages 165-169, May.
    3. Hausman, Angela, 2012. "Hedonistic rationality: Healthy food consumption choice using muddling-through," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 794-801.
    4. Aaker, Jennifer L & Lee, Angela Y, 2001. ""I" Seek Pleasures and "We" Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 33-49, June.
    5. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    6. Koert Van Ittersum & Brian Wansink, 2012. "Plate Size and Color Suggestibility: The Delboeuf Illusion's Bias on Serving and Eating Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(2), pages 215-228.
    7. Maura L. Scott & Stephen M. Nowlis & Naomi Mandel & Andrea C. Morales, 2008. "The Effects of Reduced Food Size and Package Size on the Consumption Behavior of Restrained and Unrestrained Eaters," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 391-405, July.
    8. Pierre Chandon & Brian Wansink, 2007. "The Biasing Health Halos of Fast-Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimates and Higher Side-Dish Consumption Intentions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(3), pages 301-314, June.
    9. Rita Coelho do Vale & Rik Pieters & Marcel Zeelenberg, 2008. "Flying under the Radar: Perverse Package Size Effects on Consumption Self-Regulation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 380-390, June.
    10. Sophie Hieke & Charles R. Taylor, 2012. "A Critical Review of the Literature on Nutritional Labeling," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 120-156, March.
    11. Stacey R. Finkelstein & Ayelet Fishbach, 2010. "When Healthy Food Makes You Hungry," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(3), pages 357-367, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samia Ayyub & Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Asim Nawaz, 2021. "Drivers of Organic Food Purchase Intention in a Developing Country: The Mediating Role of Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    2. Magdalena Śmiglak-Krajewska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis, 2021. "Consumer versus Organic Products in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities and Barriers to Market Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Ricci, Elena Claire & Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2018. "Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 54-65.
    4. Christopher Hickey & Derek T. Tharp, 2021. "U.S. health insurance marketplace taxonomy and the influence of labeling on consumer perception of plan suitability," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 203-231, March.
    5. Ketron, Seth & Spears, Nancy, 2019. "Sounds like a heuristic! Investigating the effect of sound-symbolic correspondences between store names and sizes on consumer willingness-to-pay," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 285-292.
    6. Marie‐Eve Laporte & Sophie Rieunier & Geraldine Michel, 2020. "When family dining protects against sweet food consumption… and when it does not," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 628-647, June.
    7. Joyce M. Wolburg, 2022. "Non‐drinking 101: How non‐drinkers navigate the drinking culture on a college campus," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 1475-1495, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bui, My (Myla) & Tangari, Andrea Heintz & Haws, Kelly L., 2017. "Can health “halos” extend to food packaging? An investigation into food healthfulness perceptions and serving sizes on consumption decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 221-228.
    2. Togawa, Taku & Park, Jaewoo & Ishii, Hiroaki & Deng, Xiaoyan, 2019. "A Packaging Visual-Gustatory Correspondence Effect: Using Visual Packaging Design to Influence Flavor Perception and Healthy Eating Decisions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 204-218.
    3. Claudia Symmank, 2019. "Extrinsic and intrinsic food product attributes in consumer and sensory research: literature review and quantification of the findings," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 39-74, February.
    4. Jaeho Yang & Bokyeong Kim, 2021. "Guilt and the Consumption of Products with an Unhealthy Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Cleeren, Kathleen & Geyskens, Kelly & Verhoef, Peter C. & Pennings, Joost M.E., 2016. "Regular or low-fat? An investigation of the long-run impact of the first low-fat purchase on subsequent purchase volumes and calories," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 896-906.
    6. Luca Panzone & Guy Garrod & Felice Adinolfi & Jorgelina Di Pasquale, 2022. "Molecular marketing, personalised information and willingness‐to‐pay for functional foods: Vitamin D enriched eggs," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 666-689, September.
    7. Bublitz, Melissa G. & Peracchio, Laura A., 2015. "Applying industry practices to promote healthy foods: An exploration of positive marketing outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2484-2493.
    8. Sanjay Jain & Krista J. Li, 2018. "Pricing and Product Design for Vice Goods: A Strategic Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 592-610, August.
    9. Judy Harris & Veronica L. Thomas, 2017. "The Influence of Bundling and Caloric Knowledge on Calories Ordered and Purchase Intent," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 113-132, March.
    10. Aner Tal & Yaniv Gvili & Moty Amar, 2021. "Visual Size Matters: The Effect of Product Depiction Size on Calorie Estimates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Jacob Suher & Raj Raghunathan & Wayne D. Hoyer, 2016. "Eating Healthy or Feeling Empty? How the "Healthy = Less Filling" Intuition Influences Satiety," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 26-40.
    12. Roose, Gudrun & Van Kerckhove, Anneleen & Huyghe, Elke, 2017. "Honey they shrank the food! An integrative study of the impact of food granularity and its operationalization mode on consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 210-220.
    13. Cheng, Yin-Hui & Yen, HsiuJu Rebecca & Chuang, Shih-Chieh & Chang, Chia-Jung, 2013. "Product option framing under the influence of a promotion versus prevention focus," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 402-413.
    14. Holden, Stephen S. & Zlatevska, Natalina, 2015. "The partitioning paradox: The big bite around small packages," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 230-233.
    15. Otterbring, Tobias & Shams, Poja, 2019. "Mirror, mirror, on the menu: Visual reminders of overweight stimulate healthier meal choices," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 177-183.
    16. Madzharov, Adriana V., 2019. "Self-Control and Touch: When Does Direct Versus Indirect Touch Increase Hedonic Evaluations and Consumption of Food," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 170-185.
    17. Mead, James A. & Richerson, Rob, 2018. "Package color saturation and food healthfulness perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 10-18.
    18. Besharat, Ali & Romero, Marisabel & Haws, Kelly, 2021. "Customizing calories: How rejecting (vs. selecting) ingredients leads to lower calorie estimation and unhealthier food choices," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 424-438.
    19. Luomala, Harri T. & Hellén, Katarina & Jokitalo, Maijastiina, 2018. "Dieting, priming, food meanings and (un)healthy choices: When shoppers fall for pleasure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 305-311.
    20. Jie, Yun, 2018. "Prepayment effect: Prepayment with clawback increases task participation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 210-218.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:50:y:2016:i:2:p:403-429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.