IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2017i2p132-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Image Effects of the Extension of Niche Class F Vehicles in Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Vladimir Sashov Zhechev
  • Evgeni Stanimirov

Abstract

In modern business there are multiple examples of companies being positioned in niches. Aiming to serve more customer groups these companies more often apply brand extension strategies. However, the latter can hamper the effective adaptation of marketing functions to key markets. Among the major reasons many niche players undertake brand extensions are to: mitigate the operational and financial risk; enhance brand awareness; take advantage of increased demand; strive to more precisely capture market segments and others. Entry into new market segments through brand extensions can pose challenges related to the control over the brand image of niche players. This paper attempts to present original framework for investigation of the impact of downward extensions over the brand image of class F vehicles in Bulgaria. The research investigates various factors intending to lay the foundations for comparison of key customer values associated with the evolving brand image of this class of vehicles.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladimir Sashov Zhechev & Evgeni Stanimirov, 2017. "Image Effects of the Extension of Niche Class F Vehicles in Bulgaria," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 132-171.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2017:i:2:p:132-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=548296
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fanny Magnoni & Elyette Roux, 2012. "The impact of step-down line extension on consumer-brand relationships: A risky strategy for luxury brands," Post-Print hal-03591724, HAL.
    2. de Ruyter, Ko & Wetzels, Martin, 2000. "The role of corporate image and extension similarity in service brand extensions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 639-659, December.
    3. Sheinin, Daniel A., 2000. "The Effects of Experience with Brand Extensions on Parent Brand Knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 47-55, July.
    4. Ahluwalia, Rohini & Gurhan-Canli, Zeynep, 2000. "The Effects of Extensions of the Family Brand Name: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(3), pages 371-381, December.
    5. F. Magnoni & Elyette Roux, 2012. "The impact of step-down line extension on consumer-brand relationships: A risky strategy for luxury brands," Post-Print halshs-00785825, HAL.
    6. Barone, Michael J & Miniard, Paul W & Romeo, Jean B, 2000. "The Influence of Positive Mood on Brand Extension Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(4), pages 386-400, March.
    7. Mooweon Rhee & Young-Choon Kim & Joon Han, 2006. "Confidence in Imitation: Niche-Width Strategy in the UK Automobile Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 501-513, April.
    8. Park, C Whan & Milberg, Sandra & Lawson, Robert, 1991. "Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 185-193, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pourazad, Naser & Stocchi, Lara & Pare, Vipul, 2019. "Brand attribute associations, emotional consumer-brand relationship and evaluation of brand extensions," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 249-260.
    2. Martínez Salinas, Eva & Pina Pérez, José Miguel, 2009. "Modeling the brand extensions' influence on brand image," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 50-60, January.
    3. Dens, Nathalie & De Pelsmacker, Patrick, 2010. "Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1237-1244, November.
    4. Nathalie Veg-Sala & Elyette Roux, 2018. "Cross-gender extension potential of luxury brands: a semiotic analysis," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(5), pages 436-448, September.
    5. Kim, Kyeongheui & Park, Jongwon, 2019. "Cultural influences on brand extension judgments: Opposing effects of thinking style and regulatory focus," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 137-150.
    6. Chung-Yu Wang & Li-Wei Wu & Chen-Yu Lin & Ruei-Jie Chen, 2017. "Purchase Intention toward the Extension and Parent Brand: The Role of Brand Commitment," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 83-103, February.
    7. Martínez, Eva & Montaner, Teresa & Pina, José M., 2009. "Brand extension feedback: The role of advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 305-313, March.
    8. Quamina, La Toya & Xue, Melanie Tao & Chawdhary, Rahul, 2023. "‘Co-branding as a masstige strategy for luxury brands: Desirable or not?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Kumar, Ajay & Paul, Justin & Unnithan, Anandakuttan B., 2020. "‘Masstige’ marketing: A review, synthesis and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 384-398.
    10. Nathalie Veg-Sala, 2017. "The impact of stereotyped and non-stereotyped brand genders on cross-gender extension evaluations," Post-Print hal-01735491, HAL.
    11. Nathalie Veg-Sala & Elyette Roux, 2017. "Cross-gender extension potential of luxury brands: a semiotic analysis," Post-Print hal-01735487, HAL.
    12. Santos, Glauber Eduardo de Oliveira & Giraldi, Janaina de Moura Engracia, 2017. "Reciprocal effect of tourist destinations on the strength of national tourism brands," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 443-450.
    13. Miniard, Paul W. & Alvarez, Cecilia M.O. & Mohammed, Shazad M., 2020. "Consumer acceptance of brand extensions: Is parental fit preeminent?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 335-345.
    14. Suzuki, Satoko & Kanno, Saori, 2022. "The role of brand coolness in the masstige co-branding of luxury and mass brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 240-249.
    15. Colucci, Mariachiara & Montaguti, Elisa & Lago, Umberto, 2008. "Managing brand extension via licensing: An investigation into the high-end fashion industry," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 129-137.
    16. Kevin Lane Keller & Donald R. Lehmann, 2006. "Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 740-759, 11-12.
    17. Xenia Raufeisen & Linda Wulf & Sören Köcher & Ulya Faupel & Hartmut H. Holzmüller, 2019. "Spillover effects in marketing: integrating core research domains," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 249-267, December.
    18. Nathalie Veg-Sala & Elyette Roux, 2014. "A semiotic analysis of the extendibility of luxury brands," Post-Print hal-01525472, HAL.
    19. Dhananjay Bapat & J. S. Panwar, 2009. "Consumer Evaluation of Brand Extensions: An Empirical Assessment in the Indian Context," Vision, , vol. 13(2), pages 47-52, April.
    20. Deng, Qian (Claire) & Messinger, Paul R., 2022. "Dimensions of brand-extension fit," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 764-787.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M3 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2017:i:2:p:132-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.