IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ate/journl/ajbev8i4-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formal Rationality as Ideal: The Textbook Approach to Management

Author

Listed:
  • Karin Brunsson

Abstract

Two approaches to rationality characterize the understanding of management accounting and control: one descriptive, based on empirical research and allowing for a variety of versions of rationality; the other normative, explained to undergraduate students through voluminous textbooks on management accounting and control and based predominantly on the idea of formal rationality. Whereas the descriptive approach is often presented as a contrast to the normative approach, the normative approach seems largely independent of empirical research or new management methods. It is suggested that the teachings of management accounting and control be based on insights from academic research prevalent within the descriptive approach to rationality

Suggested Citation

  • Karin Brunsson, 2022. "Formal Rationality as Ideal: The Textbook Approach to Management," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 8(4), pages 329-344, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ate:journl:ajbev8i4-2
    DOI: 10.30958/ajbe.8-4-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.athensjournals.gr/business/2022-8-4-2-Brunsson.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30958/ajbe.8-4-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    2. Shonagh Douglas & Elizabeth Gammie, 2019. "An investigation into the development of non-technical skills by undergraduate accounting programmes," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 304-332, May.
    3. Jill Webb & Caroline Chaffer, 2016. "The expectation performance gap in accounting education: a review of generic skills development in UK accounting degrees," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 349-367, July.
    4. Prerana Agrawal & Jacqueline Birt & Mark Holub & Warrick van Zyl, 2021. "Professional scepticism and the accounting classroom," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 213-233, May.
    5. Alena Golyagina & Danielius Valuckas, 2016. "Representation of knowledge on some management accounting techniques in textbooks," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 479-501, September.
    6. Karin Brunsson, 2017. "The Teachings of Management," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, number 978-3-319-56120-2, October.
    7. James G. March, 1978. "Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 9(2), pages 587-608, Autumn.
    8. Tomkins, Cyril, 2001. "Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 161-191, March.
    9. Gordon Boyce & Venkateshwaran Narayanan & Susan Greer & Bill Blair, 2019. "Taking the pulse of accounting education reform: liberal education, sociological perspectives, and exploring ways forward," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 274-303, May.
    10. Jonsson, Sten & Macintosh, Norman B., 1997. "CATS, RATS, AND EARS: Making the case for ethnographic accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(3-4), pages 367-386.
    11. John Burns & Gudrun Baldvinsdottir, 2005. "An institutional perspective of accountants' new roles - the interplay of contradictions and praxis," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 725-757.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Newark, Daniel A., 2014. "Indecision and the construction of self," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 162-174.
    2. Augier, Mie, 2013. "The early evolution of the foundations for behavioral organization theory and strategy," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 72-81.
    3. Swait, Joffre & Adamowicz, Wiktor, 2001. "Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 141-167, November.
    4. Chu, P. C. & Spires, Eric E. & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 1999. "Cross-Cultural Differences in Choice Behavior and Use of Decision Aids: A Comparison of Japan and the United States," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 147-170, February.
    5. Augier, Mie & March, James G., 2002. "A model scholar: Herbert A. Simon (1916-2001)," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Daniel A. Levinthal & Claus Rerup, 2021. "The Plural of Goal: Learning in a World of Ambiguity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 527-543, May.
    7. Frankfurter, George M. & McGoun, Elton G. & Allen, Douglas E., 2004. "The prescriptive turn in behavioral finance," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 449-468, September.
    8. Scapens, Robert W., 2006. "Understanding management accounting practices: A personal journey," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-30.
    9. Christina Fang & Daniel Levinthal, 2009. "Near-Term Liability of Exploitation: Exploration and Exploitation in Multistage Problems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 538-551, June.
    10. Chu, P. C. & Spires, Eric E., 2001. "Does Time Constraint on Users Negate the Efficacy of Decision Support Systems?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 226-249, July.
    11. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M., 2020. "Accounting education literature review (2019)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    12. Dominik Dellermann & Nikolaus Lipusch & Philipp Ebel & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Design principles for a hybrid intelligence decision support system for business model validation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 423-441, September.
    13. Jacobs Martin, 2016. "Accounting for Changing Tastes: Approaches to Explaining Unstable Individual Preferences," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 121-183, August.
    14. Bassam Maali & Ali M. Al-Attar, 2020. "Accounting Curricula in Universities and Market Needs: The Jordanian Case," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    15. Augier, Mie, 2001. "Sublime Simon: The consistent vision of economic psychology's Nobel laureate," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 307-334, June.
    16. Garrett, Vicki & Koontz, Tomas M., 2008. "Breaking the cycle: Producer and consumer perspectives on the non-adoption of passive solar housing in the US," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1551-1566, April.
    17. Hannah Josepha Rachel Altman & Morris Altman & Benno Torgler & Stephen Whyte, 2021. "Beauty and Preferences Formation Exemplified in the Sports Market," CREMA Working Paper Series 2021-10, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    18. Mark Heitmann & Andreas Herrmann & Christian Kaiser, 2007. "The effect of product variety on purchase probability," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 111-131, August.
    19. Robalo, Rui, 2014. "Explanations for the gap between management accounting rules and routines: An institutional approach," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 88-97.
    20. Arlegi, Ricardo, 2007. "Sequentially consistent rules of choice under complete uncertainty," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 131-143, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ate:journl:ajbev8i4-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Afrodete Papanikou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.athensjournals.gr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.