IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ssaaea/232730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The New Normal: A Policy Analysis of the US Renewable Fuel Standard

Author

Listed:
  • Hanon, Tristan

Abstract

The cause of the rise in food prices throughout the 2000s has been difficult to ascertain, but the effects have been devastating to many of the poorest countries in the world. The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) mandates a certain level of alternative fuels to be blended into gasoline annually. The level increases each year. During the global food crisis of 2008 US ethanol policies were blamed for their possible role in rapidly rising food prices. This article examines whether and how the RFS has affected corn prices and global food prices. It seeks to identify what role, if any, the RFS had in the global food crisis in order to determine how to possibly moderate such a crisis in the future. A simple experiment is simulated which compares corn price to two control commodities. Economic models for estimating price are then developed for corn and a food price index. The variables in these models include corn production, soybean price, the RFS mandate level, corn input prices, per capita income, a food price index, grain production, wheat price, and barley price from 2003 through 2012. Findings indicate that the RFS has certainly caused an increase in corn prices but has had an indeterminate impact on global food prices. Individuals living in the poorest countries of the world spend the majority of their income on food. In the summer of 2008, rising food costs led to riots plaguing the streets in many of these nations (Bourne 2009). This period was a sign that food production is beginning to feel the strain of a growing world population. Many have claimed that US policies related to alternative fuel production, and specifically the production of corn-based ethanol, were to blame for rising food prices (Leff 2012). Since the early 2000s corn ethanol was alternatively vilified and praised in the popular press, but after the start of the global food crisis no report seemed complete without a claim that US ethanol policies were to blame. Over the course of the past forty years corn ethanol has progressed as a fuel source in the United States. Two factors led to the increase in ethanol production. First, the 1973 oil embargo led to increased fuel prices in the US, making ethanol more competitive as an alternative fuel to gasoline, although briefly (Solomon, Barnes, and Halvorsen 2007). Although oil prices quickly dropped in the 1980s following the end of the embargo, the ethanol subsidies and tax exemptions stayed in place. In the late 1990s, ethanol was promoted as a fuel additive to raise the octane rating of gasoline and began to receive its first government support, including subsidies and tax exemptions (Solomon, Barnes, and Halvorsen 2007). After leaded gasoline was phased out in the 1980s methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) was used as an additive to raise octane ratings. Groundwater contamination discovered in the early 2000s led to the banning of MTBE as a fuel additive in 2005. Corn ethanol replaced MTBE, leading to further policies in support of its production and more attention on ethanol's potential as a renewable fuel. The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS1) was introduced in 2005 through the Energy Policy Act (EPAct). The policy mandated the volume of ethanol to be blended with gasoline annually through 2012. Shortly afterwards, the policy was expanded through the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA). This second iteration of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) set blending levels through 2022. Although the policy focused exclusively on corn ethanol through 2009, RFS2 expanded the mandate to other advanced renewable fuels (Schnepf and Yacobucci 2013). The RFS2 mandate states that 9 billion gallons of renewable fuels were to be blended with gasoline in 2008, increasing stepwise to 36 billion gallons in 2022 (Solomon, Barnes, and Halvorsen 2007). The corn ethanol market has been heavily researched since the 1970s. The focus of that research shifted as corn prices rose rapidly between 2005 and 2008 and the world felt the pressure of the global food crisis. The corn market became the target of intense investigation, with a focus on the impact of ethanol production upon corn prices. Some of the research since the global food crisis focused on RFS1 and the initial policies associated with ethanol production, but RFS2 has been studied less because prices began to level. This article studies the impacts of RFS2, focusing on more data and a longer view of the policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanon, Tristan, 2014. "The New Normal: A Policy Analysis of the US Renewable Fuel Standard," SS-AAEA Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2014, pages 1-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ssaaea:232730
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.232730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/232730/files/TristanHanonFinal.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.232730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McPhail, Lihong Lu & Babcock, Bruce A., 2012. "Impact of US biofuel policy on US corn and gasoline price variability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 505-513.
    2. Rask, Kevin N., 1998. "Clean air and renewable fuels: the market for fuel ethanol in the US from 1984 to 1993," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 325-345, June.
    3. Luchansky, Matthew S. & Monks, James, 2009. "Supply and demand elasticities in the U.S. ethanol fuel market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 403-410, May.
    4. Michael J. Roberts & Wolfram Schlenker, 2013. "Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the US Ethanol Mandate," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(6), pages 2265-2295, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gábor Gyarmati, 2017. "On what Factors the Wheat Production and Price Depends," Proceedings- 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2017),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chanthawong, Anuman & Dhakal, Shobhakar & Jongwanich, Juthathip, 2016. "Supply and demand of biofuels in the fuel market of Thailand: Two stage least square and three least square approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 431-443.
    2. Wang, Zidong & Fan, Xin Xin & Liu, Pan & Dharmasena, Senarath, 2016. "Demand for Ethanol in the Face of Blend Wall: Is it a Complement or a Substitute for Conventional Transportation Fuel in the United States?," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 229960, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Tenkorang, Frank & Dority, Bree L. & Bridges, Deborah & Lam, Eddery, 2015. "Relationship between ethanol and gasoline: AIDS approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 63-69.
    4. Condon, Nicole & Klemick, Heather & Wolverton, Ann, 2015. "Impacts of ethanol policy on corn prices: A review and meta-analysis of recent evidence," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 63-73.
    5. Deborah Bridges & Frank Tenkorang & Greg Nies, 2023. "The Effect Of Market Shocks On The Volatility Of Corn Price," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 31, pages 9-18, June.
    6. Wise, Timothy A., 2012. "The Cost to Mexico of U.S. Corn Ethanol Expansion," Working Papers 179098, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
    7. Paulo Henrique Hoeckel & Augusto Mussi Alvim & José Pedro Pontes & João Dias, 2023. "The Ethanol Market and Its Relation to the Price of Agricultural Commodities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Perdiguero, Jordi & Jiménez, Juan Luis, 2011. "Sell or not sell biodiesel: Local competition and government measures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 1525-1532, April.
    9. Peter Maniloff & Sul-Ki Lee, 2015. "The Ethanol Mandate and Corn Price Volatility," Working Papers 2015-01, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    10. Yusuke Matsuki, 2016. "A Distribution-Free Test of Monotonicity with an Application to Auctions," Working Papers e110, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    11. Nicolas Legrand, 2023. "War in Ukraine: The rational “wait‐and‐see” mode of global food markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 626-644, June.
    12. Thibault Fally & James Sayre, 2018. "Commodity Trade Matters," 2018 Meeting Papers 172, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    13. Théo Benonnier & Katrin Millock & Vis Taraz, 2022. "Long-term migration trends and rising temperatures: the role of irrigation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 307-330, July.
    14. Shin, Jungwoo & Hwang, Won-Sik, 2017. "Consumer preference and willingness to pay for a renewable fuel standard (RFS) policy: Focusing on ex-ante market analysis and segmentation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 32-40.
    15. Natanelov, Valeri & McKenzie, Andrew M. & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2013. "Crude oil–corn–ethanol – nexus: A contextual approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 504-513.
    16. Mônica A. Haddad & Gary Taylor & Francis Owusu, 2010. "Locational Choices of the Ethanol Industry in the Midwest Corn Belt," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 24(1), pages 74-86, February.
    17. Wolfram Schlenker, 2018. "Introduction to "Agricultural Productivity and Producer Behavior"," NBER Chapters, in: Agricultural Productivity and Producer Behavior, pages 1-9, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Bernardina Algieri, 2014. "A roller coaster ride: an empirical investigation of the main drivers of the international wheat price," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(4), pages 459-475, July.
    19. Gao, Yixuan & Malone, Trey & Schaefer, K. Aleks & Myers, Robert J., 2023. "Disentangling Short-Run COVID-19 Price Impact Pathways in the US Corn Market," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(2), May.
    20. Christiane Baumeister & Lutz Kilian, 2014. "Do oil price increases cause higher food prices? [Biofuels, binding constraints, and agricultural commodity price volatility]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 29(80), pages 691-747.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ssaaea:232730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.