IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/15510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Inefficiency In The Presence Of An Export Tax, An Import Tariff, And A State Trading Enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Schmitz, Troy G.

Abstract

Agricultural sales cooperative unions (ASCUs) in Turkey are heavily influenced by both domestic and international government policies. Both export taxes and import tariffs are used as policy tools to regulate cotton markets. Domestic price support programs, water subsidies, fertilizer subsidies, and credit subsidies have also been used as domestic policy tools. These types of subsidies are not uncommon among developing countries. This paper provides empirical estimates of the degree of economic inefficiency associated with government intervention in Turkish cotton markets. A two-region partial equilibrium model of cotton exports and imports is developed under the "small country assumption" to obtain empirical estimates of the deadweight welfare loss associated with these government subsidies. Although government intervention results in significant income distribution among the various cotton sectors within Turkey, the overall economic inefficiency of the redistribution is very low.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmitz, Troy G., 2002. "Measuring Inefficiency In The Presence Of An Export Tax, An Import Tariff, And A State Trading Enterprise," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(1), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15510
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.15510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15510/files/34010081.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.15510?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn W. Harrison & Thomas F. Rutherford & David G. Tarr, 2014. "Trade Reform in the Partially Liberalized Economy of Turkey," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: APPLIED TRADE POLICY MODELING IN 16 COUNTRIES Insights and Impacts from World Bank CGE Based Projects, chapter 5, pages 95-121, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Mercenier, Jean & Yeldan, Erinc, 1997. "On Turkey's trade policy: Is a customs union with Europe enough?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-5), pages 871-880, April.
    3. Ackerman, Karen Z. & Dixit, Praveen M., 1999. "An Introduction To State Trading In Agriculture," Agricultural Economic Reports 33909, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Schmitz, Andrew & Sigurdson, Dale & Doering, Otto, 1986. "Domestic Farm Policy and the Gains from Trade," CUDARE Working Papers 198289, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    5. Duffy, Patricia A. & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 1991. "Effects of an Export Subsidy on the U.S. Cotton Industry," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Andrew Schmitz & Dale Sigurdson & Otto Doering, 1986. "Domestic Farm Policy and the Gains from Trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(4), pages 820-827.
    7. Hudson, Darren & Ethridge, Don E., 2000. "Income Distributional Impacts Of Trade Policies In A Multi-Market Framework: A Case In Pakistan," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Schmitz, Andrew & Furtan, William Hartley & Baylis, Katherine R., 1999. "State Trading and the Upcoming WTO Discussions," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-4.
    9. Olgun, Hasan, 1989. "Some Aspects and Consequences of the Agricultural Price Interventions in Turkey," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 16(3), pages 391-410.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steve McCorriston & Donald MacLaren, 2013. "Redistribution, state trading enterprises and ‘politically optimal’ tariffs," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(4), pages 1351-1379, November.
    2. Schmitz Troy G. & Schmitz Andrew, 2002. "Food Supply Management and Tariffication: A Game Theoretic Approach," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmitz, Troy G & Schmitz, Andrew & Dumas, Chris, 1997. "Gains from Trade, Inefficiency of Government Programs, and the Net Economic Effects of Trading," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(3), pages 637-647, June.
    2. Wainio, John & Gehlhar, Mark, 2004. "MFN Tariff Cuts and U.S. Agricultural Imports Under Nonreciprocal Trade Preference Programs," Conference papers 331299, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Runge, C. Ford, 1990. "International Public Goods, Export Subsides And The Harmonization Of Environmental Regulations," Staff Papers 13840, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Runge, C. Ford & von Witzke, Harald & Thompson, Shelley, 1987. "Liberal Agricultural Trade As A Public Good: Free Trade Versus Free Riding Under Gatt," Staff Papers 13635, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    5. Reichelderfer, Katherine & Chambers, Robert G., 1987. "Agricultural Resource Conservation and Trade Policies: Are they Complementary or Inconsistent?," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270092, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Bain, Robert, 1988. "Major issues in world food grains trade," Agricultural Outlook Forum Archive 1923 - 1997 326505, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    7. Schmitz, Andrew, 1995. "Political Economic Analysis in Agricultural Trade and Competitiveness," 1994 Conference, August 22-29, 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe 183393, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Xinshen DIAO & Terry L. ROE & A. Erinç YELDAN, 1999. "How Fiscal Mismanagement May Impede Trade Reform: Lessons From An Intertemporal, Multi-Sector General Equilibrium Model For Turkey," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 37(1), pages 59-88, March.
    9. William W. Wilson & Bruce L. Dahl, 2004. "Transparency and Bidding Competition in International Wheat Trade," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 52(1), pages 89-105, March.
    10. Konan, Denise Eby & Maskus, Keith E., 2000. "Joint trade liberalization and tax reform in a small open economy: the case of Egypt," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 365-392, April.
    11. Xinshen Diao & Wenli Li & Erinc Yeldan, 2000. "How the Asian crisis affected the world economy : a general equilibrium perspective," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue Spr, pages 35-59.
    12. Türkcan, Kemal, 2014. "Investigating the Role of Extensive Margin, Intensive Margin, Price and Quantity Components on Turkey’s Export Growth during 1998-2011," MPRA Paper 53292, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Kavallari, Aikaterini & Schmitz, P. Michael, 2007. "An Empirical Assessment of Agricultural Trade Policies in the Mediterranean Basin - Regional Effects on the EU Member States," 103rd Seminar, April 23-25, 2007, Barcelona, Spain 9395, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Nilabja Ghosh, 2015. "Production, Market Structure and the Role of Public Policy: Foodgrains in the New Economy," Working Papers id:7511, eSocialSciences.
    15. Christopher S. P. Magee, 2016. "Trade creation, trade diversion, and the general equilibrium effects of regional trade agreements: a study of the European Community–Turkey customs union," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 152(2), pages 383-399, May.
    16. Lavoie, Nathalie, 2003. "The Impact Of Reforming Wheat Importing State-Trading Enterprises On The Quality Of Wheat Imported," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21901, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Diao, Xinshen & Roe, Terry L., 1998. "The Effect of Sequencing Trade and Water Market Reform on Interest Groups in Irrigated Agriculture: An Intertemporal Economy-Wide Analysis of the Moroccan Case," Bulletins 7519, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    18. Faruk Selcuk & Erinc Yeldan, 2001. "On the macroeconomic impact of the August 1999 earthquake in Turkey: a first assessment," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(7), pages 483-488.
    19. Eric Bond & Mario Crucini & Joel Rodrigue & Tristan Potter, 2013. "Misallocation and Productivity Effects of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 16(1), pages 120-134, January.
    20. Sabine Mage-Bertomeu, 2006. "Les modèles d'équilibre général appliqués à la politique commerciale : développements récents," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 116(3), pages 357-381.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.