IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/oxp/obooks/9780190464134.html

The Politics of Innovation: Why Some Countries Are Better Than Others at Science and Technology

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Lamberova, Natalia, 2021. "The puzzling politics of R&D: Signaling competence through risky projects," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 801-818.
  2. Mbassi, Christophe Martial & Messono, Omang Ombolo, 2023. "Historical technology and current economic development: Reassessing the nature of the relationship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
  3. Muzhou Zhang, 2023. "Trade and the government underfunding of environmental innovation," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(4), pages 575-586, December.
  4. Bonnín Roca, Jaime & Vaishnav, Parth & Morgan, Granger M. & Fuchs, Erica & Mendonça, Joana, 2021. "Technology Forgiveness: Why emerging technologies differ in their resilience to institutional instability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
  5. Muhammad Qasim, 2024. "A weighted average limited information maximum likelihood estimator," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(5), pages 2641-2666, July.
  6. Michael C Horowitz & Joshua A Schwartz, 2025. "To compete or strategically retreat? The global diffusion of reconnaissance strike," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 847-862, July.
  7. Esfandiar Maasoumi & Almas Heshmati & Inhee Lee, 2021. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Green innovations and patenting renewable energy technologies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 513-538, January.
  8. Douglas S. Noonan & Shiri M. Breznitz & Sana Maqbool, 2021. "Looking for a change in scene: analyzing the mobility of crowdfunding entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 685-703, August.
  9. Carsten Deckert & Rahel M. Schomaker, 2022. "Cultural tightness–looseness and national innovativeness: impacts of tolerance and diversity of opinion," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
  10. Feng-Shang Wu & Hong-Ji Huang, 2024. "Why Do Some Countries Innovate Better than Others? A New Perspective of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy Regimes and National Absorptive Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, March.
  11. Filippetti, Andrea & Vezzani, Antonio, 2022. "The political economy of public research, or why some governments commit to research more than others," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
  12. Yadong Luo, 2022. "Illusions of techno-nationalism," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(3), pages 550-567, April.
  13. Paul Winter & Hilary Devine & John Janssen & Chris Thompson, 2025. "Why not both? The effects of innovation and capital on productivity in New Zealand," Treasury Analytical Notes Series an25/12, New Zealand Treasury.
  14. Jacob Greenspon & Erika Rodigues, 2017. "Are Trends in Patenting Reflective of Innovative Activity in Canada?," CSLS Research Reports 2017-02, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
  15. Martinez, Nain & Terrazas-Santamaria, Diana, 2024. "Beyond nearshoring: The political economy of Mexico's emerging electric vehicle industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
  16. Meckling, Jonas & Nahm, Jonas, 2019. "The politics of technology bans: Industrial policy competition and green goals for the auto industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 470-479.
  17. Slavo Radosevic & Despina Kanellou & George Tsekouras, 2023. "The experimentation–accountability trade-off in innovation and industrial policy: are learning networks the solution?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 655-669.
  18. Nazareno, Luísa & Schiff, Daniel S., 2021. "The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on worker well-being," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
  19. Helveston, John P. & Wang, Yanmin & Karplus, Valerie J. & Fuchs, Erica R.H., 2019. "Institutional complementarities: The origins of experimentation in China’s plug-in electric vehicle industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 206-222.
  20. Zofio, Jose Luis & Aparicio, Juan & Barbero, Javier & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel, 2023. "The influence of bottlenecks on innovation systems performance: Put the slowest climber first," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
  21. Steven Denney & Travis Southin & David A Wolfe, 2023. "Do winners pick government? How scale-up experience shapes entrepreneurs’ assessments of innovation policy mixes," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(5), pages 858-870.
  22. Cooiman, Franziska, 2021. "Veni vidi VC – the backend of the digital economy and its political making," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-1.
  23. Gary A. Wagner & Timothy M. Komarek, 2023. "How does municipal governance structure affect innovation and knowledge diffusion? Evidence from U.S. metro areas," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 287-330, September.
  24. Núñez Rodríguez, Gaspar & Romero Tellaeche, José Antonio, 2020. "Nationalism and development: an alternative for Mexico," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
  25. Daniel Schwanen, 2017. "Innovation Policy in Canada: A Holistic Approach," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 497, December.
  26. Redding, Gordon, 2023. "Societal knowledge quality as catalyst for the competitive productivity of technology: One in a set of several universal processes in trajectories of societal progress," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(6).
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.