IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/jbrese/v67y2014i3p339-345.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Organizational and competitive influences of exploration and exploitation activities in small firms

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Marín-Idárraga, Diego Armando & Cuartas-Marín, Juan Carlos, 2019. "Relação entre inovação e desempenho: Impacto da intensidade competitiva e do slack organizacional," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 59(2), April.
  2. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
  3. Jacobs, Sofie & Cambré, Bart & Huysentruyt, Marieke & Schramme, Annick, 2016. "Unraveling Belgian fashion designers' high perceived success: A set-theoretic approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1407-1411.
  4. Laure Ambroise & Céline Bérard & Isabelle Prim-Allaz, 2020. "Performance implications of exploration and exploitation in SMEs: The mediating role of interaction orientation," Post-Print halshs-02570780, HAL.
  5. José Andrade & Mário Franco & Luis Mendes, 2021. "Technological capacity and organisational ambidexterity: the moderating role of environmental dynamism on Portuguese technological SMEs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2111-2136, October.
  6. Marina Estrada-Cruz & Noelia Rodriguez-Hernández & Antonio J. Verdú-Jover & Jose Maria Gómez-Gras, 2022. "The effect of competitive intensity on the relationship between strategic entrepreneurship and organizational results," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, March.
  7. Yasser Alizadeh & Antonie J. Jetter, 2019. "Pathways for Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Innovations: A Review and Expansion of Ambidexterity Theory," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1-33, August.
  8. Mehmet YaÅŸar & Ender Gerede, 2023. "Results of competitive dynamics: Examination of the factors determining the operational and financial performance of airlines: The case of the Turkish international airline market," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 19(4), pages 111-145.
  9. Sariol, Ana M. & Abebe, Michael A., 2017. "The influence of CEO power on explorative and exploitative organizational innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 38-45.
  10. Mousa, Fariss-Terry & Wales, William J. & Harper, Steven R., 2015. "When less is more: EO's influence upon funds raised by young technology firms at IPO," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 306-313.
  11. Pittino, Daniel & Visintin, Francesca & Lauto, Giancarlo, 2017. "A configurational analysis of the antecedents of entrepreneurial orientation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 224-237.
  12. Guo, Jingjing & Guo, Bin & Zhou, Jianghua & Wu, Xiaobo, 2020. "How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routine affect firm innovation performance within industrial clusters? The moderating effects of knowledge attributes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
  13. Krzakiewicz Kazimierz & Cyfert Szymon, 2019. "Strategic orientations of the organization - entrepreneurial, market and organizational learning," Management, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 7-19, June.
  14. Zheng, Yu Hao & Shi, Guicheng & Zhong, Hao & Liu, Matthew Tingchi & Lin, Zixiao, 2023. "Motivating strategic front-line employees for innovative sales in the digital transformation era: The mediating role of salesperson learning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
  15. Marina Estrada-Cruz & Noelia Rodriguez-Hernández & Antonio J. Verdú-Jover & Jose Maria Gómez-Gras, 0. "The effect of competitive intensity on the relationship between strategic entrepreneurship and organizational results," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
  16. Jozefine Nybom & Erik Hunter & Eric Micheels & Martin Melin, 2021. "Farmers’ strategic responses to competitive intensity and the impact on perceived performance," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(6), pages 1-22, June.
  17. Linton, Gabriel & Kask, Johan, 2017. "Configurations of entrepreneurial orientation and competitive strategy for high performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 168-176.
  18. Vinit Parida & Tom Lahti & Joakim Wincent, 2016. "Exploration and exploitation and firm performance variability: a study of ambidexterity in entrepreneurial firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1147-1164, December.
  19. Jozef Habanik & Petr Novak & Jaroslav Belas & Eva Cipovova, 2014. "Actual Trends in Business Risks for Small and Medium Enterprises. Case Studies from the Czech Republic and Slovakia," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 159-181.
  20. Liu, Chih-Hsing Sam, 2018. "Examining social capital, organizational learning and knowledge transfer in cultural and creative industries of practice," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 258-270.
  21. Adomako, Samuel & Ahsan, Mujtaba, 2022. "Entrepreneurial passion and SMEs’ performance: Moderating effects of financial resource availability and resource flexibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 122-135.
  22. Hao Shen & Nan Mei & Yu Gao, 2020. "Matching entrepreneurial orientation and operations strategy for manufacturing firms in China," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 39-52, June.
  23. Guo, Jingjing & Zhou, Shasha & Chen, Jin & Chen, Qi, 2021. "How information technology capability and knowledge integration capability interact to affect business model design:A polynomial regression with response surface analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
  24. Céline Bérard & Marc Fréchet, 2020. "Organizational antecedents of exploration and exploitation in SMEs: The role of structural and resource attributes," Post-Print halshs-02570775, HAL.
  25. Ho, Hillbun (Dixon) & Lu, Ruichang, 2015. "Performance implications of marketing exploitation and exploration: Moderating role of supplier collaboration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1026-1034.
  26. Situmeang, Frederik B.I. & Gemser, Gerda & Wijnberg, Nachoem M. & Leenders, Mark A.A.M, 2016. "Risk-taking behavior of technology firms: The role of performance feedback in the video game industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 22-34.
  27. José Andrade & Mário Franco & Luis Mendes, 2023. "Facilitating and Inhibiting Effects of Organisational Ambidexterity in SME: an Analysis Centred on SME Characteristics," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(1), pages 35-64, March.
  28. Hanane Bougadir & Mustapha Zahir, 2023. "Mechanisms For Managing Ambidexterity In Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises: Two Case Studies In The Dermocosmetics Sector," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 52-60, March.
  29. Wenke, Kathrin & Zapkau, Florian B. & Schwens, Christian, 2021. "Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SME performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 653-665.
  30. Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy & Shirokova, Galina & Ritala, Paavo, 2020. "Exploration and exploitation in crisis environment: Implications for level and variability of firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 227-239.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.