IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/cwl/cwldpp/2010.html

Inference Based on Many Conditional Moment Inequalities

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Li, Jia & Liao, Zhipeng & Zhou, Wenyu, 2025. "A general test for functional inequalities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
  2. X D’Haultfœuille & C Gaillac & A Maurel, 2025. "Partially Linear Models under Data Combination," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 92(1), pages 238-267.
  3. Lok, Thomas M. & Tabri, Rami V., 2021. "An improved bootstrap test for restricted stochastic dominance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 371-393.
  4. Firpo, Sergio & Galvao, Antonio F. & Parker, Thomas, 2023. "Uniform inference for value functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1680-1699.
  5. Parker, Thomas, 2019. "Asymptotic inference for the constrained quantile regression process," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 174-189.
  6. Molinari, Francesca, 2020. "Microeconometrics with partial identification," Handbook of Econometrics, in: Steven N. Durlauf & Lars Peter Hansen & James J. Heckman & Rosa L. Matzkin (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 7, chapter 0, pages 355-486, Elsevier.
  7. Rami V. Tabri & Christopher D. Walker, 2020. "Inference for Moment Inequalities: A Constrained Moment Selection Procedure," Papers 2008.09021, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
  8. Federico A. Bugni & Ivan A. Canay & Deborah Kim, 2025. "Testing Conditional Stochastic Dominance at Target Points," Papers 2503.14747, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
  9. Xavier D'Haultfoeuille & Christophe Gaillac & Arnaud Maurel, 2021. "Rationalizing rational expectations: Characterizations and tests," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 817-842, July.
  10. Ganesh Karapakula, 2023. "Stable Probability Weighting: Large-Sample and Finite-Sample Estimation and Inference Methods for Heterogeneous Causal Effects of Multivalued Treatments Under Limited Overlap," Papers 2301.05703, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
  11. Marcoux, Mathieu & Russell, Thomas M. & Wan, Yuanyuan, 2024. "A simple specification test for models with many conditional moment inequalities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 242(1).
  12. Yu‐Chin Hsu & Shu Shen, 2021. "Testing monotonicity of conditional treatment effects under regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 346-366, April.
  13. Hsu, Yu-Chin & Shen, Shu, 2019. "Testing treatment effect heterogeneity in regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 468-486.
  14. Karun Adusumilli & Taisuke Otsu, 2017. "Empirical Likelihood for Random Sets," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(519), pages 1064-1075, July.
  15. Shosei Sakaguchi, 2024. "Partial identification and inference in duration models with endogenous censoring," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 308-326, March.
  16. Heiler, Phillip, 2024. "Heterogeneous treatment effect bounds under sample selection with an application to the effects of social media on political polarization," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 244(1).
  17. Kengo Kato & Yuya Sasaki & Takuya Ura, 2021. "Robust inference in deconvolution," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(1), pages 109-142, January.
  18. Semenova, Vira, 2023. "Debiased machine learning of set-identified linear models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1725-1746.
  19. Chesher, Andrew & Rosen, Adam M., 2020. "Generalized instrumental variable models, methods, and applications," Handbook of Econometrics, in: Steven N. Durlauf & Lars Peter Hansen & James J. Heckman & Rosa L. Matzkin (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 7, chapter 0, pages 1-110, Elsevier.
  20. Rami V. Tabri & Mathew J. Elias, 2024. "Testing for Restricted Stochastic Dominance under Survey Nonresponse with Panel Data: Theory and an Evaluation of Poverty in Australia," Papers 2406.15702, arXiv.org.
  21. Wataru Urasaki & Tomoyuki Nakagawa & Tomotaka Momozaki & Sadao Tomizawa, 2024. "Generalized Cramér’s coefficient via f-divergence for contingency tables," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 18(4), pages 893-910, December.
  22. Valentina Corradi & Sainan Jin & Norman R. Swanson, 2023. "Robust forecast superiority testing with an application to assessing pools of expert forecasters," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 596-622, June.
  23. Yonghong An & Pengfei Liu, 2020. "Eliciting Information from Sensitive Survey Questions," Papers 2009.01430, arXiv.org.
  24. Fakih, Ali & Makdissi, Paul & Marrouch, Walid & Tabri, Rami V. & Yazbeck, Myra, 2022. "A stochastic dominance test under survey nonresponse with an application to comparing trust levels in Lebanese public institutions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 342-358.
  25. Mikkel Plagborg-Møller & Christian K. Wolf, 2022. "Instrumental Variable Identification of Dynamic Variance Decompositions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(8), pages 2164-2202.
  26. Thomas M. Russell, 2020. "Policy Transforms and Learning Optimal Policies," Papers 2012.11046, arXiv.org.
  27. Botosaru, Irene & Muris, Chris, 2025. "Identification of time-varying counterfactual parameters in nonlinear panel models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 252(PB).
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.