IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/zeswps/031997.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social insurances and the culture of solidarity: The moral infrastructure of interpersonal redistributions - with special reference to the German health care system

Author

Listed:
  • Hinrichs, Karl

Abstract

Social insurance schemes have proved to be rather stable welfare state institutions enjoying broad popular support. It is widely assumed that the high degree of legitimacy is due to the insurance analogy because those schemes provide individually equitable returns on prior contribution payments. In this article it is demonstrated that all social insurance schemes contain interpersonal redistributions on a large scale, resulting from uniform contribution rates, provisions geared at social adequacy of benefits, and unequal treatment of different birth cohorts. In Germany, those redistributive elements are most pronounced in the statutory health care scheme. It is argued that the unchallenged functioning of social insurances is dependent on a prevailing culture of solidarity. It denotes an immunity to the temptation of individual utility maximization based upon recognized moral duties which then facilitates ongoing redistributive processes. Results from qualitative interviews with persons insured with the German statutory health care scheme clearly indicate the presence of those solidary virtues. The continued existence of this moral infrastructure appears to be less threatened by progressing individualization. Rather, it might be eroded by current political attempts to shift the balance between solidarity and self-reliance which intensify mistrust in the permanence of comprehensive health care protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Hinrichs, Karl, 1997. "Social insurances and the culture of solidarity: The moral infrastructure of interpersonal redistributions - with special reference to the German health care system," Working papers of the ZeS 03/1997, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:zeswps:031997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/41547/1/567147541.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papadakis, Elim & Bean, Clive, 1993. "Popular Support for the Welfare State: A Comparison Between Institutional Regimes," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 227-254, July.
    2. Pete Alcock, 1996. "The advantages and disadvantages of the contribution base in targeting benefits: A social analysis of the insurance scheme in the United Kingdom," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(1), pages 31-49, January.
    3. Roller, Edeltraud, 1996. "Abbau des Sozialstaats: Einstellungen der Bundesbürger zu Kürzungen von Sozialleistungen in den neunziger Jahren," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 96-205, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Thompson, Lawrence H, 1983. "The Social Security Reform Debate," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 21(4), pages 1425-1467, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Geanakoplos & Olivia S. Mitchell & Stephen P. Zeldes, "undated". "Social Security Money's Worth," Pension Research Council Working Papers 97-20, Wharton School Pension Research Council, University of Pennsylvania.
    2. LAL, Deepak & van Wijnbergen, Sweder, 1985. "Government deficits, the real interest rate and LDC debt : On global crowding out," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 157-191.
    3. Gevers, J.M.P. & Gelissen, J.P.T.M. & Arts, W.A. & Muffels, R.J.A., 1999. "Public health care in balance : Exploring popular support for health care systems in the European Union," WORC Paper 99.12.04, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    4. Charles W. Meyer & Nancy L. Wolff, 1987. "Intercohort and Intracohort Redistribution under Old Age Insurance: The 1962–1972 Retirement Cohorts," Public Finance Review, , vol. 15(3), pages 259-281, July.
    5. Michael J. Boskin & Douglas J. Puffert, 1987. "Social Security and the American Family," NBER Working Papers 2117, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Maria Clara Murteira, 2008. "A Reforma de 2007 do Sistema Público de Pensões em Portugal: Uma análise crítica das escolhas normativas implícitas," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 28, pages 56-75, December.
    7. Nick Bailey & Maria Gannon & Ade Kearns & Mark Livingston & Alastair H Leyland, 2013. "Living Apart, Losing Sympathy? How Neighbourhood Context Affects Attitudes to Redistribution and to Welfare Recipients," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(9), pages 2154-2175, September.
    8. Michael J. Boskin, 1987. "Future Social Security Financing Alternatives and National Saving," NBER Working Papers 2256, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Gustman, A.L. & Mitchell, O.S. & Steinmeier, T.L., 1993. "The Role of Pensions in the Labor Market," Papers 93-07, Cornell - Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.
    10. Richard V. Burkhauser & John A. Turner, 1985. "Is the Social Security Payroll Tax a Tax?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 13(3), pages 253-267, July.
    11. Polyachenko Sergiy, 2016. "Do changes in social and economic characteristics affect attitude towards price control?," EERC Working Paper Series 16/05e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS.
    12. Verbon, H.A.A. & Verhoeven, M.J.M., 1990. "Decision-making on pension schemes : Expectation-formation under demographic change," Other publications TiSEM b16b288f-a21b-491b-b3c0-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Olivia S. Mitchell & Jan Olson & Thomas Steinmeier, "undated". "Construction of the Earnings and Benefits File (EBF) for Use with the Health and Retirement Survey," Pension Research Council Working Papers 98-19, Wharton School Pension Research Council, University of Pennsylvania.
    14. Yamada, Tetsuji, 1990. "The effects of Japanese social security retirement benefits on personal saving and elderly labor force behavior," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 327-363, December.
    15. Shanto Iyengar, 2013. "Racial Cues and Attitudes toward Redistribution: A Comparative Experimental Approach," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 59, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    16. Simonovits, A., 1992. "Indexation of pensions in Hungary : A simple cohort model," Other publications TiSEM 41863913-40b5-4059-a555-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. H. Verbon, 1987. "The rise and evolution of public pension systems," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 75-100, January.
    18. Michael J. Boskin & Douglas J. Puffert, 1987. "Social Security and the American Family," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 1, pages 139-159, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Adeline Otto & Dimitri Gugushvili, 2020. "Eco-Social Divides in Europe: Public Attitudes towards Welfare and Climate Change Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Gál, Róbert Iván, 1996. "A társadalombiztosítási programok ösztönző hatásai [Incentive effects of social security programs: a survey]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 128-140.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:zeswps:031997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zesbrde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.