IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzblpe/spi2003104.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Berufliche Weiterbildung in Großbritannien für gering qualifizierte Arbeitskräfte

Author

Listed:
  • Schröter, Peter

Abstract

Die Aktivitäten im Bereich der beruflichen Weiterbildung erreichen innerhalb des deutschen Beschäftigungssystems lediglich ein unterdurchschnittliches Niveau. Der stetige Anstieg der Qualifikationsanforderungen erfordert jedoch eine Steigerung der Weiterbildungsaktivitäten und insbesondere eine Bildungsstrategie, die vor allem niedrig qualifizierte Arbeitskräfte aktiviert und in lebensbegleitende Lernprozesse integriert. Die Studie macht deutlich, dass ein simultaner Einsatz unterschiedlicher Instrumente die Weiterbildungsteilnahme von gering Qualifizierten signifikant erhöhen kann. Gegenüber einer pauschalen Förderung von Weiterbildungsaktivitäten kann die zunehmende Zielgruppenorientierung in der britischen Weiterbildungspolitik zur Effizienzsteigerung staatlicher Steuerungsprozesse als vorbildhaft eingestuft werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Schröter, Peter, 2003. "Berufliche Weiterbildung in Großbritannien für gering qualifizierte Arbeitskräfte," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2003-104, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzblpe:spi2003104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/44003/1/379425297.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Munro & Helen Rainbird, 2000. "The New Unionism and the New Bargaining Agenda: UNISON–Employer Partnerships on Workplace Learning in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 38(2), pages 223-240, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Wallis & Mark Stuart & Ian Greenwood, 2005. "‘Learners of the workplace unite!’," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(2), pages 283-304, June.
    2. Catherine Cassell & Bill Lee, 2009. "Trade unions learning representatives: progressing partnership?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 213-230, June.
    3. Helen Rainbird & Mark Stuart, 2011. "The state and the union learning agenda in Britain," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(2), pages 202-217, June.
    4. Sang-Woo Lee, 2005. "The Transformation of the British Business Culture under the Globalizing Environment," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 8(2), pages 203-222, June.
    5. Gill Kirton & Geraldine Healy, 2004. "Shaping Union and Gender Identities: A Case Study of Women‐Only Trade Union Courses," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 42(2), pages 303-323, June.
    6. L. Booth, Alison & Böheim, René, 2001. "The impact of bargaining institutions on employer-provided training in Britain," ISER Working Paper Series 2001-08, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    7. John McIlroy, 2008. "Ten Years of New Labour: Workplace Learning, Social Partnership and Union Revitalization in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 283-313, June.
    8. Patricia Findlay & Chris Warhurst, 2011. "Union Learning Funds and Trade Union Revitalization: A New Tool in the Toolkit?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 49(Supplemen), pages 115-134, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzblpe:spi2003104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.