IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/rpaebs/337476.html

Einsatzpotenziale von KI zur Lösung von Controlling-Fallstudien

Author

Listed:
  • Klimm, Johanna
  • Müller, Kathrin
  • Rößle, Felix

Abstract

Diese Arbeit analysiert die Einsatzfähigkeit von Large Language Models (LLMs) wie Google Gemini und Microsoft Copilot bei der Bearbeitung komplexer Controlling-Fallstudien. Praxisnahe Themen wie Kapitalflussrechnung, Selbstkostenberechnung und Eigen- vs. Fremdfertigung werden in Deutsch und Englisch anhand von fünf Kriterien (Korrektheit, Vollständigkeit, Plausibilität, Anwendbarkeit, Verständlichkeit) geprüft und von und ChatGPT ein zweites Mal geprüft. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass LLMs im ersten Schritt strukturierte und plausible Lösungen liefern, jedoch ihre Leistung in der Selbsteinschätzung stark überbewerten. Signifikanztests bestätigen, dass die Selbsteinschätzungen deutlich positiver ausfallen als die Bewertungen durch eine neutrale Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) und den Vergleich mit Musterlösungen. Entgegen der Erwartung können die LLMs englischsprachige Aufgaben nicht besser lösen als deutschsprachige. Auch dieser Zusammenhang erweist sich als statistisch signifikant. Die Ergebnisse verdeutlichen, dass menschliche Expertise und Kontrolle für strategische Entscheidungen weiterhin unerlässlich sind, während LLMs derzeit vor allem als Unterstützungstools geeignet sind.

Suggested Citation

  • Klimm, Johanna & Müller, Kathrin & Rößle, Felix, 2026. "Einsatzpotenziale von KI zur Lösung von Controlling-Fallstudien," Rosenheim Papers in Applied Economics and Business Sciences 13/2026, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:rpaebs:337476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/337476/1/1963013166.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rammer, Christian & Doherr, Thorsten & Kinne, Jan & Lenz, David, 2024. "KI-Einsatz in Unternehmen in Deutschland: Strategische Ausrichtung und internationale Position," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 303033.
    2. Fotoh, Lazarus Elad & Mugwira, Tatenda, 2025. "Exploring Large Language Models in external audits: Implications and ethical considerations," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Heimo Losbichler & Othmar M. Lehner, 2021. "Limits of artificial intelligence in controlling and the ways forward: a call for future accounting research," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 365-382, January.
    4. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-10-2020-0207 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrian GROȘANU & Melinda-Timea FÜLÖP & Nicolae MĂGDAȘ, 2024. "Ethical Dilemmas in Digital Accounting: A Comprehensive Literature Review," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 5(4), pages 56-67, April.
    2. Melinda Timea Fülöp & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Dan Ioan Topor, 2025. "Digital business world and ethical dilemmas: a systematic literature review," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 23-41, March.
    3. Laura Broccardo & Elisa Ballesio & Daniele Giordino & Elisa Giacosa, 2025. "Guiding the Algorithm: Harnessing artificial intelligence to nurture SMEs management control systems," Post-Print hal-05235644, HAL.
    4. Kroeger Thilo & Schaffranka Claudia & Schnitzer Monika, 2025. "Strukturwandel in den Regionen: Was sich ändert und wie die Politik reagieren sollte," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 105(8), pages 546-553.
    5. Stratopoulos, Theophanis C. & Wang, Victor Xiaoqi, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and accounting research: a framework and agenda," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    6. Ovidiu-Constantin BUNGET & Cristian LUNGU, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Implications of Artificial Intelligence on the Accounting Profession," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 4(5), pages 65-72, May.
    7. Laura Broccardo & Elisa Ballesio & Daniele Giordino & Elisa Giacosa, 2025. "Guiding the Algorithm: Harnessing artificial intelligence to nurture SMEs management control systems," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(1 Suppl.), pages 13-36.
    8. Andreea CORDOS (M. LABADITIS) & Adriana TIRON-TUDOR, 2023. "Ï»¿A Status Quo On The Literature Of Disruptive Technologies In Accounting - Implications For Adoption Decision," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(25), pages 1-11.
    9. Blondeel, Eva & Bullock, Taylor & Gaskin, James & Schuetzler, Ryan & Serre, Rachel & Steffen, Jacob & Wells, Taylor M. & Wood, David A., 2025. "The effects of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on learning in an accounting data analytics course," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Muehlemann, Samuel, 2025. "Artificial intelligence adoption and workplace training," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    11. Favourate y Mpofu, 2023. "The application of Artificial Intelligence in external auditing and its implications on audit quality? A review of the ongoing debates," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(9), pages 496-512, December.
    12. Favourate Y Mpofu & Queen Mpofu, 2025. "The application of digital technologies in external auditing: a double edged sword?," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(1), pages 39-56, January.
    13. Aneta Zemánková, 2021. "Artificial intelligence in management accounting [Využití umělé inteligence v manažerském účetnictví]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(4), pages 81-99.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:rpaebs:337476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.th-rosenheim.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.