IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jaarpp/jaar-10-2020-0207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limits of artificial intelligence in controlling and the ways forward: a call for future accounting research

Author

Listed:
  • Heimo Losbichler
  • Othmar M. Lehner

Abstract

Purpose - Looking at the limits of artificial intelligence (AI) and controlling based on complexity and system-theoretical deliberations, the authors aimed to derive a future outlook of the possible applications and provide insights into a future complementary of human–machine information processing. Derived from these examples, the authors propose a research agenda in five areas to further the field. Design/methodology/approach - This article is conceptual in its nature, yet a theoretically informed semi-systematic literature review from various disciplines together with empirically validated future research questions provides the background of the overall narration. Findings - AI is found to be severely limited in its application to controlling and is discussed from the perspectives of complexity and cybernetics. A total of three such limits, namely the Bremermann limit, the problems with a partial detectability and controllability of complex systems and the inherent biases in the complementarity of human and machine information processing, are presented as salient and representative examples. The authors then go on and carefully illustrate how a human–machine collaboration could look like depending on the specifics of the task and the environment. With this, the authors propose different angles on future research that could revolutionise the application of AI in accounting leadership. Research limitations/implications - Future research on the value promises of AI in controlling needs to take into account physical and computational effects and may embrace a complexity lens. Practical implications - AI may have severe limits in its application for accounting and controlling because of the vast amount of information in complex systems. Originality/value - The research agenda consists of five areas that are derived from the previous discussion. These areas are as follows: organisational transformation, human–machine collaboration, regulation, technological innovation and ethical considerations. For each of these areas, the research questions, potential theoretical underpinnings as well as methodological considerations are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Heimo Losbichler & Othmar M. Lehner, 2021. "Limits of artificial intelligence in controlling and the ways forward: a call for future accounting research," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 365-382, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-10-2020-0207
    DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-10-2020-0207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAAR-10-2020-0207/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAAR-10-2020-0207/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JAAR-10-2020-0207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aneta Zemánková, 2021. "Artificial intelligence in management accounting [Využití umělé inteligence v manažerském účetnictví]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(4), pages 81-99.
    2. Ovidiu-Constantin BUNGET & Cristian LUNGU, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Implications of Artificial Intelligence on the Accounting Profession," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 4(5), pages 65-72, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-10-2020-0207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.