IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/irsdia/52020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wie man soziale Innovationen in strukturschwachen ländlichen Räumen befördern kann
[How Social Innovation can be Supported in Structurally Weak Rural Regions]

Author

Listed:
  • Christmann, Gabriela B.

Abstract

In vielen strukturschwachen ländlichen Regionen Europas hat sich in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten eine Abwärtsspirale in Gang gesetzt. Zwar sind die konkreten wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Bedingungen in den einzelnen Regionen Europas oft sehr unterschiedlich, dennoch zeigt sich tendenziell dasselbe Muster: Im Vergleich zu Städten sind die Bedingungen für das alltägliche Leben in strukturschwachen ländlichen Gebieten aufgrund einer geringeren wirtschaftlichen Produktivität, geringer Berufsperspektiven und einer sich verschlechternden infrastrukturellen Ausstattung (z.B. in der Daseinsvorsorge) eher ungünstig. Dies hat dazu geführt, dass immer mehr Landbewohnerinnen und -bewohner in die Städte abwanderten. Insbesondere jüngere, gut ausgebildete Personen haben ländlichen Regionen den Rücken gekehrt. Eine Folge davon ist, dass die dort benötigten Arbeits- bzw. Fachkräfte fehlen und sich die wirtschaftlichen Chancen der Regionen weiter verschlechtern. Dies macht es oft schwer, die Abwärtsspirale zu durchbrechen bzw. umzukehren.

Suggested Citation

  • Christmann, Gabriela B., 2020. "Wie man soziale Innovationen in strukturschwachen ländlichen Räumen befördern kann [How Social Innovation can be Supported in Structurally Weak Rural Regions]," IRS Dialog 5/2020, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:irsdia:52020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/228609/1/irs-dialog-5-2020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriela B. Christmann, 2020. "Introduction: struggling with innovations. Social innovations and conflicts in urban development and planning," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 423-433, March.
    2. Coronado, Daniel & Acosta, Manuel & Fernández, Ana, 2008. "Attitudes to innovation in peripheral economic regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6-7), pages 1009-1021, July.
    3. Christmann, Gabriela B. & Ibert, Oliver & Jessen, Johann & Walther, Uwe-Jens, 2020. "Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 496-520.
    4. Gillwald, Katrin, 2000. "Konzepte sozialer Innovation," Papers, Research Network Project "Work and Ecology" P 00-519, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    5. Hennebry Barraí, 2018. "Regional Resilience in Ireland and The Existence of a Two-Tier Recovery," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 37(4), pages 99-110, December.
    6. Christmann, Gabriela B., 2020. "Introduction: struggling with innovations. Social innovations and conflicts in urban development and planning," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 423-433.
    7. Richter, Ralph, 2019. "Rural social enterprises as embedded intermediaries: The innovative power of connecting rural communities with supra-regional networks," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 70(8), pages 179-187.
    8. Gabriela B. Christmann & Oliver Ibert & Johann Jessen & Uwe-Jens Walther, 2020. "Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 496-520, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christmann, Gabriela B., 2020. "How Social Innovation can be Supported in Structurally Weak Rural Regions," IRS Dialog 5/2020e, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    2. Zerrer, Nicole & Sept, Ariane, 2020. "Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(4), pages 78-88.
    3. Nicole Zerrer & Ariane Sept, 2020. "Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 78-88.
    4. Richter, Ralph & Christmann, Gabriela B., 2021. "On the role of key players in rural social innovation processes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue (Articles.
    5. Baxter, Jamie Scott & Chatzichristos, Georgios & Christmann, Gabriela & Hennebry, Barraí & Kovanen, Sunna & Novikova, Marina & Olmedo, Lucas & Stoustrup, Sune W. & van Twuijver, Mara & Umantseva, Anna, 2020. "Social Enterprises in Structurally Weak Rural Regions: Innovative Troubleshooters in Action. Handbook for Practitioners," IRS Dialog 6/2020, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    6. Evgeny M. Bukhvald, 2020. "Managing the spatial development of the Russian economy: Goals and tools," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(6), pages 2-14, December.
    7. Sept, Ariane, 2021. "‘Slowing down’ in small and medium-sized towns: Cittaslow in Germany and Italy from a social innovation perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 259-268.
    8. Vara-Sánchez, Isabel & Gallar-Hernández, David & García-García, Lidia & Morán Alonso, Nerea & Moragues-Faus, Ana, 2021. "The co-production of urban food policies: Exploring the emergence of new governance spaces in three Spanish cities," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Rogatka, Krzysztof & Kowalski, Mateusz & Starczewski, Tomasz, 2023. "Less important space? Spatial planning in small towns in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    10. Noack, Anika & Jacobsen, Heike, 2021. "Transfer scouts: from intermediation to co-constructors of new knowledge and technologies in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    11. Manganelli, Benedetto & Tataranna, Sabina & Pontrandolfi, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A model to support the decision-making in urban regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Estrada, Isabel & de la Fuente, Gabriel & Martín-Cruz, Natalia, 2010. "Technological joint venture formation under the real options approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1185-1197, November.
    13. Catalina Martinez & Lydia Bares, 2018. "The link between technology transfer and international extension of university patents: Evidence from Spain," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(6), pages 827-842.
    14. Haruo H. Horaguchi & Toichiro Susumago, 2022. "Global R&D Location Strategy of Multinational Enterprises: an Agent-Based Simulation Modeling Approach," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 457-479, December.
    15. Guych Nuryyev & Yu-Ping Wang & Jennet Achyldurdyyeva & Bih-Shiaw Jaw & Yi-Shien Yeh & Hsien-Tang Lin & Li-Fan Wu, 2020. "Blockchain Technology Adoption Behavior and Sustainability of the Business in Tourism and Hospitality SMEs: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Richter, Ralph, 2020. "Innovations at the edge: how local innovations are established in less favourable environments," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-21.
    17. Edwards-Schachter,Mónica & Wallace,Matthew, 2015. "âShaken, but not stirredâ: six decades defining social innovation," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201504, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    18. Martijn J. Smit & Maria A. Abreu & Henri L.F. Groot, 2015. "Micro-evidence on the determinants of innovation in the Netherlands: The relative importance of absorptive capacity and agglomeration externalities," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(2), pages 249-272, June.
    19. Mara Willemijn van Twuijver & Lucas Olmedo & Mary O’Shaughnessy & Thia Hennessy, 2020. "Rural social enterprises in Europe: A systematic literature review," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(2), pages 121-142, March.
    20. Federica Scaffidi, 2022. "Regional Implications of the Circular Economy and Food Greentech Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:irsdia:52020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://leibniz-irs.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.