IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Finance for the poor in demand: Who uses microfinance and why?


  • Ströh de Martínez, Christiane


The paper adds to the debate on how far microfinance can contribute to poverty reduction and development. The recent controversial discussion about microfinance as a development instrument is taken as a starting point. The paper starts with the hypothesis that the prevalent notions and assumptions about the users of microfinance are behind the controversies. Hence, after an analysis of common concepts about microfinance clients and their usage of financial services, a different theoretical frame is presented. From a social science perspective, the frame builds on the distinction of different modes of production within societies and economies as proposed by Structural Heterogeneity. This leads to a different understanding of microenterprises within a family-led mode of production, which is further developed in the light of Schumpeter's analysis of economic development. The proposed theoretical approach is linked to recent empirical research on microfinance users, especially Financial Diary research. From this analysis, a new theoretical conception of the demand side of microfinance emerges. It stresses the relevance of considering different socioeconomic formations people live and work in. For the important family-led mode of production, typical usage patterns point to the need for convenient, flexible, multi-purpose financial management services.

Suggested Citation

  • Ströh de Martínez, Christiane, 2011. "Finance for the poor in demand: Who uses microfinance and why?," IPE Working Papers 10/2011, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ipewps:102011

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Popli, Gurleen K., 2010. "Trade Liberalization and the Self-Employed in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 803-813, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ipewps:102011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.