IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Rankings von Zeitschriften und Personen in der BWL

Listed author(s):
  • Dilger, Alexander

Rankings gewinnen in der Wissenschaft an Bedeutung, stehen aber auch in der Kritik. Es kann Unterschiedliches zu verschiedenen Zwecken mit noch anderen Folgen gerankt werden. Im Folgenden werden nur Forschungsrankings betrachtet, die entweder wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften oder die darin veröffentlichten Wissenschaftler in eine Rangfolge bringen. Die Betrachtung erfolgt am Beispiel der deutschen Betriebswirtschaftslehre (BWL), kann jedoch prinzipiell in den meisten Wissenschaften entsprechend angewandt werden. Innerhalb der BWL ist das VHB-JOURQUAL 2 ein aktuelles Beispiel für ein Zeitschriftenranking, das Handelsblatt-Betriebswirte Ranking hingegen ein aktuelles Personenranking. Zu letzterem wird eine Alternative direkt über Zitationen vorgeschlagen. Grundannahme der Analyse ist, dass Anreize auch in der Wissenschaft wirken, sowohl selektierend wie auch motivierend, doch Fehlanreize entsprechend falsch wirken, weshalb eine Analyse von Rankings und ihre Verbesserung lohnt.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by University of Münster, Institute for Economic Education in its series IÖB-Diskussionspapiere with number 5/09.

in new window

Date of creation: 2009
Handle: RePEc:zbw:ioebdp:509
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Universitätsstr. 14-16, 48143 Münster

Phone: 02 51 / 83-2 29 10
Fax: 02 51 / 83-2 83 99
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ioebdp:509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.