IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkwp/540.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Umweltpolitik und technologisches Anpassungsverhalten im End-of-Pipe-Fall

Author

Listed:
  • Michaelis, Peter

Abstract

In diesem Beitrag wird gezeigt, wie sich auf Basis der zugrundeliegenden technisch-ökonomischen Zusammenhänge eine Vermeidungskostenfunktion für den Fall der Endof- Pipe-Behandlung produktionsspezifischer Schadstoffemissionen konstruieren läßt. Im Gegensatz zu den üblicherweise in der Literatur getroffenen Annahmen ist die hieraus resultierende Kostenfunktion weder konvex noch stetig differenzierbar. Dies hat zur Folge, daß sich das einzelwirtschaftliche Anpassungsverhalten bei Erhebung einer Emissionsabgabe nicht an der üblichen Marginalbedingung orientiert. Stattdessen resultieren diskontinuierliche Anpassungsprozesse (Technologiesprünge), die ausgelöst werden, wenn der Abgabesatz eine kritische Schwelle überschreitet. Die Höhe dieser Schwelle ist nicht nur von der Kostenstrukrur der Technologien abhängig, sondern auch von unternehmensindividuellen Merkmalen, wie insbesondere der Produktionskapazität. Die Zusammenhänge' zwischen umweltpolitischem Instrumenteinsatz, Unternehmensgröße und Technologiewahl werden für unterschiedliche Entscheidungssituationen analysiert und anhand eines empirischen Beispiels aus der NE-Metallindustrie illustriert. Dabei zeigt sich insbesondere, daß bei Existenz von 'sunk cost' eine Rigidität gegenüber der Ablösung veralteter Umweltschutztechniken besteht, die umso stärker ausgeprägt ist, je geringer die Kapazität des betrachteten Unternehmens ist. Abschließend wird diskutiert, welche Schlußfolgerungen aus diesen Ergebnissen für die umweltpolitische Instrumentenwahl gezogen werden können.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaelis, Peter, 1992. "Umweltpolitik und technologisches Anpassungsverhalten im End-of-Pipe-Fall," Kiel Working Papers 540, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/46999/1/256778337.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William J. Baumol & Wallace E. Oates, 1971. "The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Peter Bohm & Allen V. Kneese (ed.), The Economics of Environment, pages 53-65, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Klepper, Gernot & Michaelis, Peter, 1991. "Cadmium in West Germany: how much do we know about stocks and flows?," Kiel Working Papers 494, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Klepper, Gernot & Michaelis, Peter, 1992. "Reducing cadmium emission into the air," Kiel Working Papers 531, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    2. Claudia Kettner-Marx & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig, 2018. "Carbon Taxes from an Economic Perspective," WIFO Working Papers 554, WIFO.
    3. Michael Grubb & Tim Laing & Thomas Counsell & Catherine Willan, 2011. "Global carbon mechanisms: lessons and implications," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 539-573, February.
    4. Patrick Criqui & Denise Cavard, 2004. "Economic approach to climate policies and stakes of international negotiations," Post-Print halshs-00003793, HAL.
    5. Stavins, Robert & Hahn, Robert & Cavanagh, Sheila, 2001. "National Environmental Policy During the Clinton Years," RFF Working Paper Series dp-01-38, Resources for the Future.
    6. Agnar Sandmo, 2002. "Efficient Environmental Policy with Imperfect Compliance," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 23(1), pages 85-103, September.
    7. Hassan, Mahmoud & Oueslati, Walid & Rousselière, Damien, 2020. "Environmental taxes, reforms and economic growth: an empirical analysis of panel data," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    8. Roediger-Schluge, Thomas, 2001. "The Stringency of Environmental Regulation and the 'Porter Hypothesis'," Research Memorandum 002, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Winkler, Harald, 2005. "Renewable energy policy in South Africa: policy options for renewable electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 27-38, January.
    10. Sofia Lundberg & Per-Olov Marklund & Elon Strömbäck, 2016. "Is Environmental Policy by Public Procurement Effective?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 44(4), pages 478-499, July.
    11. Zhongxiang Zhang, 1994. "Setting Targets and the Choice of Policy Instruments for Limiting CO2 Emissions1," Energy & Environment, , vol. 5(4), pages 327-341, December.
    12. Siebert, Horst, 1975. "Regional aspects of environmental allocation," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 3585, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Bukvić, Rajko, 2017. "Ефекат Стакленика, Глобално Загревање И Кјотски Протокол [Greenhouse Effect, Global Warming and Kyoto Protocol]," MPRA Paper 83953, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    14. Heindl, Peter, 2012. "Transaction costs and tradable permits: Empirical evidence from the EU emissions trading scheme," ZEW Discussion Papers 12-021, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    15. Rennings, Klaus & Koschel, Henrike, 1995. "Externe Kosten der Energieversorgung und ihre Bedeutung im Konzept einer dauerhaft-umweltgerechten Entwicklung," ZEW Dokumentationen 95-06, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Don Fullerton & Ann Wolverton, 2002. "The Case for a Two-Part Instrument: Presumptive Tax and Environmental Subsidy," Chapters, in: Don Fullerton & Thomas C. Kinnaman (ed.), The Economics of Household Garbage and Recycling Behavior, chapter 10, pages 175-200, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Daugbjerg, Carsten & Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard, 2001. "Designing green taxes in a political context: From optimal to feasible environmental regulation," Working Papers 01-17, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics.
    18. Amédée Mollard, 2003. "Multifonctionnalité de l’agriculture et territoires : des concepts aux politiques publiques," Post-Print hal-01200974, HAL.
    19. Gupta, Sanjeev & Miranda, Kenneth & Parry, Ian, 1995. "Public expenditure policy and the environment: A review and synthesis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 515-528, March.
    20. Musso, Antonio & Rothengatter, Werner, 2013. "Internalisation of external costs of transport–A target driven approach with a focus on climate change," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 303-314.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.