IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hwwadp/349.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Kosten und Nutzen einer Fusion von Hamburg und Schleswig-Holstein

Author

Listed:
  • Lammers, Konrad

Abstract

Der Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, ob eine Fusion der Länder Hamburg und Schleswig-Holstein zu einem Bundesland ökonomisch von Vorteil ist. Es wird gezeigt, dass generell die Größe von Ländern nicht positiv mit dem Pro-Kopf-Einkommen oder dem wirtschaftlichen Wachstum korreliert. Die Einsparungen, die durch einen Zusammenschluss der beiden Länder bei der Erfüllung öffentlicher Aufgaben entstehen können, werden als gering eingeschätzt. Eine Fusion von Hamburg und Schleswig-Holstein könnte sich dennoch unter bestimmten Bedingungen lohnen. Es wird argumentiert, dass das fusionierte Land unter einer politischen Führung eine effizientere und wachstumsfreundlichere räumliche Allokation privater und öffentlicher Investitionen realisieren könnte. Die Beseitigung von Ländergrenzen im Agglomerationsraum Hamburg könnte zu einer Stärkung der dortigen Wachstumskräfte führen. Eine weitere Bedingung wäre zu erfüllen, damit sich die Fusion aus Sicht der beiden Länder lohnt: In Verhandlungen mit dem Bund und den anderen Bundesländern wäre sicherzustellen, dass sich das neue Bundesland im Bund-Länder-Finanzausgleich nicht schlechter stellt als gegenwärtig beide Länder zusammen.

Suggested Citation

  • Lammers, Konrad, 2006. "Kosten und Nutzen einer Fusion von Hamburg und Schleswig-Holstein," HWWA Discussion Papers 349, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hwwadp:349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/19378/1/349.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krieger-Boden, Christiane, 1999. "Nationale und regionale Spezialisierungsmuster im europäischen Integrationsprozeß," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 2294, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Lammers, Konrad, 2006. "Brauchen wir eine regionale Strukturpolitik?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue 9, pages 525-531.
    3. Charles M. Tiebout, 1961. "An Economic Theory of Fiscal Decentralization," NBER Chapters, in: Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization, pages 79-96, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kersten Kellermann, 2008. "„Kosten der Kleinheit” und die Föderalismusdebatte in der Schweiz," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(2), pages 196-225, May.
    2. Kellermann, Kersten, 2007. "Kosten der Kleinheit und die Föderalismusdebatte in der Schweiz," KOFL Working Papers 3, Konjunkturforschungsstelle Liechtenstein (KOFL), Vaduz.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marciano, Alain, 2011. "Buchanan on externalities: An exercise in applied subjectivism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 280-289.
    2. Stirböck, Claudia, 2001. "Agglomeration tendencies in EU regions: where does capital go?," ZEW Discussion Papers 01-28, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Chang Woon Nam & Rüdiger Parsche & Bettina Reichl, 2001. "Municipal finance and governance in Poland, the Slovak Republic, the Czech Republic, and Hungary," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 2, October.
    4. Abhay Pethe, 2007. "Issues For The 13TH Finance Commission: Welcome To The Grey World Of Trade Offs!," Department of Economics, University of Mumbai, Mumbai Working Papers 27, Department of Economics, University of Mumbai, Mumbai.
    5. Stirböck, Claudia, 2002. "Explaining the Level of Relative Investment Specialisation: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of EU Regions," ZEW Discussion Papers 02-49, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. D. K. Srivastava, 2006. "Equalizing Health and Education : Approach of the Twelfth Finance Commission," Finance Working Papers 22517, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    7. Luis Diaz-Serrano & Enric Meix-Llop, 2019. "Decentralization and the quality of public services: Cross-country evidence from educational data," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(7), pages 1296-1316, November.
    8. Chang Woon Nam & Rüdiger Parsche & Matthias Steinherr, 2001. "The Principles of Parallel Development of Fiscal Capacity between State and Municipalities as Useful Benchmarks for the Determination of the Inter-governmental Grants in Germany," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 525-537, June.
    9. Chang Woon Nam & Rüdiger Parsche, 2001. "Looking for Appropriate Forms of Intergovernmental Transfers for Municipalities in Transition Economies," CESifo Working Paper Series 614, CESifo.
    10. Alain Marciano, 2023. "The Political Economy of Buchanan's Samaritan's Dilemma," Springer Books, in: Martin A. Leroch & Florian Rupp (ed.), Power and Responsibility, pages 345-357, Springer.
    11. Maxime Desmarais-Tremblay, 2014. "On the Definition of Public Goods. Assessing Richard A. Musgrave's contribution," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14004, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    12. Heinesen, Eskil, 2005. "School district size and student educational attainment: evidence from Denmark," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 677-689, December.
    13. Axel Dreher & Roland Vaubel, 2004. "The Causes and Consequences of IMF Conditionality," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 26-54, May.
    14. Leonzio Rizzo, 2006. "Le inefficienze della competizione fiscale: una rassegna dei principali modelli teorici," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 89-120.
    15. Robert W. Gilmer, 1976. "Tax Islands, Fiscal Equity, and Fiscal Equalization," Public Finance Review, , vol. 4(4), pages 479-492, October.
    16. Yi Ren & Yang Bian & Tao He, 2017. "Characterizing the Land Shareholding Cooperative: A Case Study of Shanglin Village in Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Lammers, Konrad & Stiller, Silvia, 2000. "Regionalpolitische Implikationen der neuen ökonomischen Geographie," HWWA Discussion Papers 85, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    18. Hans-Werner Sinn, 1998. "European Integration and the Future of the Welfare State," CESifo Working Paper Series 153, CESifo.
    19. Stirböck, Claudia, 2002. "What Determines Relative Sectoral Investment Patterns in EU Regions?," ZEW Discussion Papers 02-55, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Stirböck, Claudia, 2004. "Comparing Investment and Employment Specialisation Patterns of EU Regions," ZEW Discussion Papers 04-43, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fusion von Bundesländern; Finanzausgleich; räumliche Spillovers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy
    • R53 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hwwadp:349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hwwaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.