IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Traditionelle Budgetierung versus Beyond Budgeting: Darstellung und Wertung anhand eines Praxisbeispiels

Listed author(s):
  • Held, Bärbel
Registered author(s):

    Die traditionelle Budgetsteuerung ist überholt und verursacht mehr Schaden als Nutzen. Die klassische Budgetsteuerung ist zu zeitaufwändig, zu unflexibel, zu bürokratisch und verhindert heute die Nutzung des vollen Potentials eines Unternehmens. [Daum, H./2006]. Trotz dieser These findet man in der Unternehmenspraxis auch heute noch mehrheitlich die traditionelle Budgetierung vor, wie das Fallbeispiel zeigt. Nun kommen, bedingt durch die derzeitige Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise, vermehrt Anfragen an die Wissenschaft, mit welchen Managementkonzepten auf den Wandel reagiert werden kann. Eine mögliche praxisnahe Lösungsalternative die in ein neues Managementmodell überführt werden kann, soll hier vorgestellt werden.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden (OTH) in its series Weidener Diskussionspapiere with number 20.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2009
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:hawdps:20
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hawdps:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.