IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fubsbe/200413.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Experimental study of implications of SFAS 131: The effects of the new standard on the informativeness of segment reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Bar-Yosef, Sasson
  • Venezia, Itzhak

Abstract

This paper analyzes whether the new business segment reporting disclosure rules, SFAS 131, will actually provide capital market participants with more predictive ability than the previous rules. For this we conduct three experiments. Two experiments with advanced accounting students as subjects, where the experiments differ in the firm the subjects analyze, and the third with professional financial analysts. In each experiment we provide one group of subjects with accounting reports based on the new standard (New Rules Group, NRG), and another group with reports based on the old standard (Old Rules Group, ORG). We ask both groups to forecast several accounting and market values of a firm. We then compare the performance predictions and analyses of the two groups. Most of the forecasts of the NRG are neither significantly different from those of the ORG, nor significantly more accurate. Subjects also report the variables that they consider important in their analysis. 25% of the NRG students in Experiment I mention the segment data as being central in their decisions and 33% say they used segment or sector data. Among the analysts in Experiment II the corresponding percentages are 0% and 60%, respectively. Also in experiment III, where the subjects rank the top 4 variables they use in their predictions according to importance, segment repots receive a mediocre rank. It therefore appears that the reports according to the new rules, whereas noticeable by the subjects, do not have a major positive impact on their responses. The subjects also exhibit a considerable degree of overconfidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Bar-Yosef, Sasson & Venezia, Itzhak, 2004. "Experimental study of implications of SFAS 131: The effects of the new standard on the informativeness of segment reporting," Discussion Papers 2004/13, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fubsbe:200413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/49921/1/668829141.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:joares:v:20:y:1982:i:1:p:171-188 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:bla:joares:v:28:y:1990:i:2:p:305-325 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:bla:joares:v:36:y:1998:i:1:p:111-128 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:bla:joares:v:35:y:1997:i::p:1-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:bla:joares:v:34:y:1996:i::p:33-50 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    segment reporting; FASB 131; experimental economics; overconfidence;

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fubsbe:200413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/fwfubde.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.