IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/341571.html

Cultural Momentum, Demographic Divergence, and Population Prospects in India, 2100: Son Preference as a Structural Driver of Fertility and Long-Term Projections

Author

Listed:
  • Yadav, Harsh
  • Goli, Srinivas

Abstract

Standard cohort-component projection models for India omit one of the most durable behavioural drivers of fertility: son preference operating through Differential Stopping Behaviour (DSB). This paper addresses that gap by introducing son preference as an explicit stratification dimension alongside education and urban-rural residence extending the Vienna School’s multi-dimensional demographic framework to include gender norms as a structural modifier of fertility. Using a relational Gompertz framework estimated from a 300-cell state-by-residence-by-son-preference-category-by-NFHS-round panel, we find that son preference raises TFR by 15.4 per cent net of all socioeconomic controls and shifts the fertility schedule toward older ages. A 10 per cent permanent reduction in DSB-driven fertility from 2021 yields approximately 50–60 million fewer people across 15 major states by 2100; an SSP2-style counterfactual places the full demographic cost at 426 million. Shift-share decomposition reveals that in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, cultural momentum defined as cumulative population divergence from the sustained gap between observed and structurally expected fertility operates alongside demographic momentum as a binding constraint. These results suggest that projection models conditioned only on development covariates may understate long-run population size in high-preference states.

Suggested Citation

  • Yadav, Harsh & Goli, Srinivas, 2026. "Cultural Momentum, Demographic Divergence, and Population Prospects in India, 2100: Son Preference as a Structural Driver of Fertility and Long-Term Projections," EconStor Preprints 341571, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341571/1/Population_Projection_Son_Preference_India.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kingsley Davis, 1945. "The World Demographic Transition," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 237(1), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Shelley Clark, 2000. "Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from india," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 37(1), pages 95-108, February.
    3. Seema Jayachandran, 2017. "Fertility Decline and Missing Women," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(1), pages 118-139, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ash:wpaper:37 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Rossi, Pauline & Rouanet, Léa, 2015. "Gender Preferences in Africa: A Comparative Analysis of Fertility Choices," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 326-345.
    3. Anukriti, S. & Herrera Almanza, Catalina & Hossain, Shahadat & Karra, Mahesh, 2025. "Son Preference and Women’s Mental Health and Well-Being in India," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360992, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Zurab Abramishvili & William Appleman & Sergii Maksymovych, 2019. "Parental Gender Preference in the Balkans and Scandinavia: Gender Bias or Differential Costs?," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp643, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    5. Bhalotra, Sonia & Clots-Figueras, Irma & Iyer, Lakshmi, 2021. "Religion and abortion: The role of politician identity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Dincecco, Mark & Fenske, James & Gupta, Bishnupriya & Menon, Anil, 2024. "Conflict and Gender Norms," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1491, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    7. S Anukriti & Sonia Bhalotra & Eddy H F Tam, 2022. "On the Quantity and Quality of Girls: Fertility, Parental Investments and Mortality," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(641), pages 1-36.
    8. James Fenske & Bishnupriya Gupta & Cora Neumann, 2025. "Missing women in colonial India," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 78(4), pages 997-1038, November.
    9. Anukriti, S & Herrera-Almanza, Catalina & Hossain, Shahadat & Karra, Mahesh, 2026. "Son Preference, Intergenerational Household Dynamics, and Women's Mental Health in India," IZA Discussion Papers 18653, IZA Network @ LISER.
    10. Baland, Jean-Marie & Cassan, Guilhem & Woitrin, Francois, 2020. "The Stopping Rule and Gender selective mortality: World Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 15128, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    11. Heather Congdon Fors & Annika Lindskog, 2023. "Son preference and education Inequalities in India: the role of gender-biased fertility strategies and preferential treatment of boys," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 1431-1460, July.
    12. Milazzo, Annamaria, 2018. "Why are adult women missing? Son preference and maternal survival in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 467-484.
    13. Bhukta, Rikhia, 2025. "Factories and Fertility: The Impact of Manufacturing Growth on Son Preference," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1664, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    14. Anukriti, S. & Kwon, Sungoh & Prakash, Nishith, 2022. "Saving for dowry: Evidence from rural India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Onur Altindag, 2016. "Son Preference, Fertility Decline, and the Nonmissing Girls of Turkey," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(2), pages 541-566, April.
    16. Garima Rastogi & Anisha Sharma, 2022. "Unwanted daughters: the unintended consequences of a ban on sex-selective abortions on the educational attainment of women," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 1473-1516, October.
    17. Lnu,Anukriti & Erten,Bilge & Mukherjee,Priya, 2022. "Women’s Political Representation and Intimate Partner Violence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10113, The World Bank.
    18. Demir, Firat & Ghosh, Pallab & Xu, Zhengang, 2026. "The effects of female political participation on missing women: Evidence from the Egyptian protests of 2011–2014," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 194-213.
    19. Eleanor Jawon Choi & Jisoo Hwang, 2020. "Transition of Son Preference: Evidence From South Korea," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(2), pages 627-652, April.
    20. Bhaswati Das & Nowaj Sharif & Sumit Kumar, 2025. "Son Preference and Single-Child Families in India's Fertility Transition," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 1-21, December.
    21. Ankita Mishra & Jaai Parasnis, 2021. "Husband, sons and the fertility gap: evidence from India," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 71-102, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.