IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpmh/0212001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating the compatibility of economic reform with political liberalisation in poor african countries -the case of malawi

Author

Listed:
  • P. Kalonga Stambuli

    (Surrey Institute of Global Economics Research)

Abstract

This paper investigates claims that fundamental policy changes aiming to disengage the state from the economy do not provide appropriate discourse for a new government in a newly democratised state. This view has a lot of support among Stalinist-Marxist scholars who believe that unmaking a welfare state simultaneously as the process of reassigning power to the people is a contradictory and politically suicidal undertaking. Based on the analysis of change in Malawi, this paper offers philosophical counter-arguments supporting the view that economic reform is a necessary condition for democratic development. The main argument is that, given that the role of political liberalisation is to enable people [previously trapped in an econo-political hegemony] to make decisions about their own lives, then economic reform is the only instrument capable of delivering the desired transformation. This is on the premise that personal freedom is a derivative of economic freedom, and that by opening up the market and unleashing popular participation in the economy, economic reform facilitates convergence of a free society and a market economy. The paper also argues that political rhetoric signalling the reversal of economic reforms as a socialist alternative has the potential to sustain a sitting reformist government in power as in the case of the reformist National Action Party (PAN) which rules in Mexico while the PRI founded in 1929 remains outside government. The paper also observes that a platform critical of economic reform is bound to ignite apprehension for potential loss of personal and economic freedoms that arose from a process of reform. However, owing to evidence that change from one party to multipartyism in Malawi was brought on largely by economic policy failure, the paper supports the argument that resource scarcity, degradation and poverty (measured by household food scarcity, social indicators, and the incidence of malnutrition) pose a major threat to democracy. Although the question of returning to autocracy in the hope that there will be economic prosperity may be outside present options, economic instability or uncertainty in the free market economy is certainly not a satisfactory recompense for emergence of new and wider freedoms.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Kalonga Stambuli, 2002. "Evaluating the compatibility of economic reform with political liberalisation in poor african countries -the case of malawi," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 0212001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmh:0212001
    Note: Type of Document - Tex/Word; prepared on IBM PC ; to print on HP; pages: 29; figures: included. Published as SIGER working paper series no 2002/68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mhet/papers/0212/0212001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mhet/papers/0212/0212001.doc.gz
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mhet/papers/0212/0212001.ps.gz
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic reform; political liberalisation; African democracy;

    JEL classification:

    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • F49 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Other
    • R38 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmh:0212001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.