IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpgt/9707001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The solution to Arrow's difficulty in social welfare

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Cool

Abstract

Arrow's Theorem holds that no constitution can satisfy certain properties. In annex to that theorem, Arrow claims that those properties are reasonable and morally desirable. In his view there thus is the difficulty that people desire a constitution that cannot exist. While the Theorem stands as a mathematical result, the additional claims concern other domains, i.e. the domains of reasonableness and morality. It are these claims that have caused much confusion in the literature. It is shown here that the claims are unwarranted, since inconsistent properties are neither reasonable nor morally desirable. It is shown too that Arrow's axiom of the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives is not realistic, and thus unattractive. We show the existence of some constitutions that are consistent and might be optimal to many. The major error made by Arrow and his students is to mix up the context of scientific discovery and learning with the context of application to the real world by educated people.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Cool, 1997. "The solution to Arrow's difficulty in social welfare," General Economics and Teaching 9707001, EconWPA, revised 04 Sep 1997.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:9707001
    Note: 13 pages Word for Windows 6.0, 50 KB, zipped 18 KB
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/get/papers/9707/9707001.doc.gz
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/get/papers/9707/9707001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/get/papers/9707/9707001.ps.gz
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/get/papers/9707/9707001.html
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A - General Economics and Teaching

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:9707001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: http://econwpa.repec.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.