IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa04p233.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Spatial Sampling Strategies for Assessing Public Opinion Under the Water Framework Directive: A Case Study of the Ythan Project

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Sang

Abstract

Consultation with and inclusion of the public on measures to manage and improve water resources is a key tenet of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). This involves establishing people’s opinions but also the perspectives (both metaphoric and literal) which inform these. In particular water is a complex and dynamic spatial entity with many spatial expressions relating to its various functions, so perspectives as to its utility and proper management are equally various. In establishing a catchment rather than discipline based approach to management, the WFD recognises the spatially integrated nature of the issues. It also poses a challenge to research, in that the pattern presented by the interaction between human and biophysical processes is a compound of the complexities of the two systems. Capturing the detail of such a pattern from a sample requires a strategy which is sensitive to the relevant dynamics of each system. This paper considers a case study relating to a postal survey carried out by the Macaulay Institute on behalf of the EU Life Environment Fund’s Ythan Project, which aimed to develop wider participation in the protection of the River Ythan (Scotland’s first Nitrate Vulnerable Zone). A thousand questionnaires were sent to residents and farmers in the Ythan catchment in spring 2002, for comparison the adjacent River Ugie and the more distant Loch Leven catchments were surveyed the following year. The methodology presented represents the attempt to maximise at the design stage the utility this data would have for analysis of responses in relation to both respondent’s social-environs and the proximity of the water body, as well as to ensure a representative over all sample. The somewhat awkward term “water body” highlights the difficulties for the key issue of definition, be that for rivers and lochs, or people, residences and urban areas. The decisions made with regards to definition are explained and results from the survey presented illustrating the practical significance of initial object definitions in conditioning the outcome. The importance of considering spatial aspects post survey is also highlighted. Keywords: Spatial, Sampling, Water Framework Directive, Survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Sang, 2004. "Spatial Sampling Strategies for Assessing Public Opinion Under the Water Framework Directive: A Case Study of the Ythan Project," ERSA conference papers ersa04p233, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa04p233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa04/PDF/233.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. du Plessis, Valerie & Beshiri, Roland & Bollman, Ray D. & Clemenson, Heather, 2002. "Definitions of "Rural"," Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series 28031, Statistics Canada.
    2. Iain White & Joe Howe, 2003. "POLICY AND PRACTICE: Planning and the European union water framework directive," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 621-631.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ligita Gasparėnienė & Rita Remeikienė & Colin C. Williams, 2022. "Unemployment and the Informal Economy," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-96687-4, October.
    2. Paula Orr & John Colvin & David King, 2007. "Involving stakeholders in integrated river basin planning in England and Wales," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(1), pages 331-349, January.
    3. Thomas Verbeek & Ann Pisman & Georges Allaert, 2012. "The countryside in urbanized Flanders: towards a flexible definition for a dynamic policy," ERSA conference papers ersa12p476, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Luis Puigjaner & Mar Pérez-Fortes & José M. Laínez-Aguirre, 2015. "Towards a Carbon-Neutral Energy Sector: Opportunities and Challenges of Coordinated Bioenergy Supply Chains-A PSE Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-48, June.
    5. Mara Balestrieri & Amedeo Ganciu, 2018. "Landscape Changes in Rural Areas: A Focus on Sardinian Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Ligita Gasparėnienė & Rita Remeikienė & Colin C. Williams, 2022. "Theorizing the Informal Economy," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Unemployment and the Informal Economy, chapter 0, pages 7-60, Springer.
    7. Bainbridge, Daryl & Seow, Hsien & Sussman, Jonathan & Pond, Gregory & Barbera, Lisa, 2015. "Factors associated with not receiving homecare, end-of-life homecare, or early homecare referral among cancer decedents: A population-based cohort study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(6), pages 831-839.
    8. Will Medd & Simon Marvin, 2007. "Strategic intermediation: between regional strategy and local practice," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 318-327.
    9. Alasia, Alessandro, 2004. "Mapping the Socio-economic Diversity of Rural Canada: A Multivariate Analysis," Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series 28048, Statistics Canada.
    10. Colin Busby & William B.P. Robson & Pierre-Marcel Desjardins, 2009. "Stress Test: Demographic Pressures and Policy Options in Atlantic Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Backgrounder, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 120, November.
    11. Herron, Rachel V. & Lawrence, Breanna C. & Newall, Nancy E.G. & Ramsey, Doug & Waddell- Henowitch, Candice M. & Dauphinais, Jennifer, 2022. "Rural older adults’ resilience in the context of COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    12. Pierre-Marcel DESJARDINS, 2011. "Regional Disparities In Canada: Interprovincial Or Urban/Rural?," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 33, pages 59-80.
    13. Manuela Alcañiz & Maria-Carme Riera-Prunera & Aïda Solé-Auró, 2019. "“Do elderly people living in rural areas enjoy better mental well-being? Evidence from Catalonia, Spain”," IREA Working Papers 201913, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Jul 2019.
    14. Andrea S Gershon & Jun Guan & Chengning Wang & J Charles Victor & Teresa To, 2012. "Describing and Quantifying Asthma Comorbidty: A Population Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-12, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    spatial; sampling; water framework directive; survey.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa04p233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.