IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uwo/epuwoc/20152.html

A CGE Framework for Modelling the Economics of Flooding and Recovery in a Major Urban Area

Author

Abstract

Coastal cities around the world have experienced large costs from major flooding events in recent years. Climate change is predicted to bring an increased likelihood of flooding due to sea level rise and a higher frequency of severe storms. In order to plan future development and adaptation, cities must know the magnitude of losses associated with these events, and how they can be reduced. Often losses are calculated by adding up insurance claims or surveying flood victims. However, this largely neglects the loss due to the interruption of economic activity caused by a flood. There have been some attempts to account for the output losses using input-output techniques, but these do not account for the mitigation achieved through flexible prices, changes in output composition, and factor substitution. Here, we use a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to study how a local economy responds to a flood, focusing on the subsequent recovery/reconstruction. Initial damage is modelled as a shock to the capital stock and recovery requires rebuilding that stock. We apply the model to Metro Vancouver by considering a flood scenario causing total capital damage of $14.6 billion spread across five municipalities. Transportaqtion and Warehousing are most severely impacted, followed by Manufacturing and Wholesale Trade. We find that the GDP loss relative to a scenario with no flood is 1.9% ($2.07B) in the first year after the flood, 1.7% ($1.97B) in the second year, 1.5% ($1.70B) in the fifth year and 1.1% ($1.42B) in the twentieth year. We also find that the losses tend to scale approximately linearly with the damage rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron B. Gertz & James Davies, 2015. "A CGE Framework for Modelling the Economics of Flooding and Recovery in a Major Urban Area," University of Western Ontario, Economic Policy Research Institute Working Papers 20152, University of Western Ontario, Economic Policy Research Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwo:epuwoc:20152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1075&context=economicsepri_wp
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuchen Hu & Harvey Cutler & Yihua Mao, 2023. "Economic Loss Assessment for Losses Due to Earthquake under an Integrated Building, Lifeline, and Transportation Nexus: A Spatial Computable General Equilibrium Approach for Shelby County, TN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Adam Rose, 2022. "Behavioral Economic Consequences of Disasters: A Basis for Inclusion in Benefit–Cost Analysis," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 213-233, July.
    3. Jere Lehtomaa & Clément Renoir, 2023. "The Economic Impact of Tropical Cyclones: Case Studies in General Equilibrium," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 23/382, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    4. Jorge Garcia-Hernandez & Roy Brouwer, 2023. "Water Markets as a Coping Mechanism for Climate-Induced Water Changes on the Canadian Economy: A Computable General Equilibrium Approach," Papers 2309.16678, arXiv.org.
    5. Walmsley, Terrie & Rose, Adam & John, Richard & Wei, Dan & Hlávka, Jakub P. & Machado, Juan & Byrd, Katie, 2023. "Macroeconomic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Tuano, Philip Arnold P. & Muyrong, Marjorie S. & Clarete, Ramon L., 2018. "Economic Impact of Typhoon Ondoy in Pasig and Marikina Cities Using a Multiweek CGE Model Analysis," Philippine Journal of Development PJD 2016 Vol. 43 No. 2a, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwo:epuwoc:20152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://economics.uwo.ca/research/research_papers/epri_workingpapers.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.