IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uts/rpaper/301.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Heterogeneous Beliefs and the Performances of Optimal Portfolios

Author

Abstract

The market selection depends on agent's survival index, which is a function of agent's belief and risk preference. When preferences are identical, the survival index of an agent is a decreasing function of his belief accuracy and therefore agent survives if and only if he has the lowest survival index. Following this result, one maybe tempted to think that an agent is expected to perform at least as good as the market if he survives, and he is expected to outperform the market if his belief is more accurate than all other agents' beliefs. We show that the these statements are false in general. In terms of long-run performance, market outperforms those agents who do not have the minimum survival index in the long-run. When multiple agents survive, we show that no agent can outperform the market in the long-run. In terms of the expected performance, all agents are expected to underperform the market even when they all survive in the long-run. When survival indices differ, the fittest agent with the lowest survival index is expected to outperform the market consistently with any given finite investment horizons if and only if his subjective belief is much more accurate than the other agents' beliefs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue-Zhong He & Lei Shi, 2012. "Heterogeneous Beliefs and the Performances of Optimal Portfolios," Research Paper Series 301, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Handle: RePEc:uts:rpaper:301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/qfr-archive-03/QFR-rp301.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elyès Jouini & Clotilde Napp, 2007. "Consensus Consumer and Intertemporal Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Beliefs," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(4), pages 1149-1174.
    2. Elyès Jouini & Clotilde Napp, 2010. "Unbiased Disagreement in Financial Markets, Waves of Pessimism and the Risk-Return Trade-off," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 15(3), pages 575-601.
    3. Jaksa Cvitanic & Fernando Zapatero, 2004. "Introduction to the Economics and Mathematics of Financial Markets," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262532654, January.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/78 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    heterogeneous beliefs; equilibrium asset prices; survival; consensus belief; portfolio performance;

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uts:rpaper:301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Duncan Ford). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/qfutsau.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.