IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unm/umamet/2005004.html

An assessment of measurement invariance between online and mail surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Deutskens, Elisabeth

    (Marketing & Supply Chain Management)

  • de Ruyter, J.C.

    (Marketing & Supply Chain Management)

  • Wetzels, M.G.M.

    (Marketing & Supply Chain Management)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Deutskens, Elisabeth & de Ruyter, J.C. & Wetzels, M.G.M., 2005. "An assessment of measurement invariance between online and mail surveys," Research Memorandum 004, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    • Handle: RePEc:unm:umamet:2005004
    DOI: 10.26481/umamet.2005004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/ws/files/1465643/guid-e4871a1e-eb1d-4513-9a60-2c322c1f1256-ASSET1.0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26481/umamet.2005004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fishburn, Peter C., 1976. "Continua of stochastic dominance relations for bounded probability distributions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 295-311, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel M. Denuit & Louis Eeckhoudt, 2010. "A General Index of Absolute Risk Attitude," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 712-715, April.
    2. Ruodu Wang & Qinyu Wu, 2025. "The reference interval in higher-order stochastic dominance," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 13(2), pages 263-277, October.
    3. Michel Denuit & Louis Eeckhoudt & Béatrice Rey, 2010. "Some consequences of correlation aversion in decision science," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 259-269, April.
    4. Iosif Pinelis, 2013. "An optimal three-way stable and monotonic spectrum of bounds on quantiles: a spectrum of coherent measures of financial risk and economic inequality," Papers 1310.6025, arXiv.org.
    5. Bassan, Bruno & Denuit, Michel & Scarsini, Marco, 1999. "Variability orders and mean differences," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 121-130, November.
    6. Light, Bar & Perlroth, Andres, 2021. "The Family of Alpha,[a,b] Stochastic Orders: Risk vs. Expected Value," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    7. Wang, Ruodu & Wu, Qinyu, 2025. "Prudence and higher-order risk attitudes in the rank-dependent utility model," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    8. Kuan Xu & Gordon Fisher, 2006. "Myopic loss aversion and margin of safety: the risk of value investing," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(6), pages 481-494.
    9. Christian Laudag'e & Felix-Benedikt Liebrich, 2025. "When risk defies order: On the limits of fractional stochastic dominance," Papers 2509.24747, arXiv.org.
    10. Denuit, Michel & Lefevre, Claude, 1997. "Some new classes of stochastic order relations among arithmetic random variables, with applications in actuarial sciences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 197-213, October.
    11. Fabio Maccheroni & Pietro Muliere & Claudio Zoli, 2005. "Inverse stochastic orders and generalized Gini functionals," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3), pages 529-559.
    12. Hans Peters & Tim Schulteis & Dries Vermeulen, 2010. "Generalized stochastic dominance and bad outcome aversion," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 35(2), pages 285-290, July.
    13. Iosif Pinelis, 2014. "An Optimal Three-Way Stable and Monotonic Spectrum of Bounds on Quantiles: A Spectrum of Coherent Measures of Financial Risk and Economic Inequality," Risks, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-44, September.
    14. Mao, Tiantian & Wang, Ruodu, 2022. "Fractional stochastic dominance in rank-dependent utility and cumulative prospect theory," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    15. Laurie Bréban & André Lapidus, 2019. "Adam Smith on lotteries: an interpretation and formal restatement," Working Papers hal-00914222, HAL.
    16. Wang, Hongxia & Zhou, Lin & Dai, Peng-Fei & Xiong, Xiong, 2022. "Moment conditions for fractional degree stochastic dominance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    17. Rolf Aaberge & Tarjei Havnes & Magne Mogstad, 2013. "A theory for ranking distribution functions," Discussion Papers 763, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    18. Raymond H. Chan & Ephraim Clark & Xu Guo & Wing-Keung Wong, 2020. "New development on the third-order stochastic dominance for risk-averse and risk-seeking investors with application in risk management," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 108-132, June.
    19. Tommaso Lando & Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti, 2019. "Distorted stochastic dominance: a generalized family of stochastic orders," Papers 1909.04767, arXiv.org.
    20. Francesco Andreoli & Claudio Zoli, 2020. "From unidimensional to multidimensional inequality: a review," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 78(1), pages 5-42, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unm:umamet:2005004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrea Willems or Angie Figueroa Alarcon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/meteonl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.