IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-388634.html

Monitoring biodiversity mainstreaming in development cooperation post-2020: Exploring ways forward

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Brörken
  • Jean Huge
  • Farid Dahdouh-Guebas
  • Tom Waas
  • Anne Julie Rochette
  • Luc Janssens de Bisthoven

Abstract

From 2022 onwards the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) of the Convention on Biological Diversity will guide biodiversity conservation actions worldwide, which includes mainstreaming biodiversity into a wide range of activities, sectors and policies. Biodiversity mainstreaming in development cooperation is particularly relevant given the direct dependence of many communities in the Global South on biodiversity and on the benefits it provides. We conducted a Delphi survey among development cooperation practitioners at the aid provider (donor) side, to gain insight into current and future (post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework) biodiversity mainstreaming and its monitoring. Our results demonstrate that despite efforts towards biodiversity mainstreaming and its monitoring, biodiversity mainstreaming indicators remain inconsistent and difficult to compare. The lack of biodiversity data, as well as their low accessibility and suboptimal use, and the inherent complexity of addressing biodiversity loss are considered key challenges. Respondents indicated that they strongly orient their own biodiversity mainstreaming and monitoring approaches towards international biodiversity governance dynamics. We conclude that, at least on paper, the indicator ambitions of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework are in line with the expectations and challenges of aid providers with respect to biodiversity mainstreaming. However, future effective mainstreaming of biodiversity requires indicator-based monitoring, exchange of good practices among aid partners, and a continued focus on awareness-raising regarding the linkages between biodiversity conservation and poverty reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Brörken & Jean Huge & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Tom Waas & Anne Julie Rochette & Luc Janssens de Bisthoven, 2022. "Monitoring biodiversity mainstreaming in development cooperation post-2020: Exploring ways forward," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/388634, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/388634
    Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/388634/3/Broerkenetal_2022_EnvironSciPol.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel, Morrison & Craig, Bullock & Deirdre, Lynn, 2021. "Exploring the rise of expenditure reviews as a tool for more effective biodiversity conservation and the protection of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    2. Anthony Waldron & Daniel C. Miller & Dave Redding & Arne Mooers & Tyler S. Kuhn & Nate Nibbelink & J. Timmons Roberts & Joseph A. Tobias & John L. Gittleman, 2017. "Reductions in global biodiversity loss predicted from conservation spending," Nature, Nature, vol. 551(7680), pages 364-367, November.
    3. Jean Huge, 2010. "Sustainability indicators for Clean Development Mechanism projects in Vietnam," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/217967, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Hugé, Jean & Rochette, Anne-Julie & Janssens de Bisthoven, Luc & Dahdouh-Guebas, Farid & Koedam, Nico & Vanhove, Maarten P.M., 2017. "Utilitarian framings of biodiversity shape environmental impact assessment in development cooperation," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 91-102.
    5. Åsa Persson, 2009. "Environmental policy integration and bilateral development assistance: challenges and opportunities with an evolving governance framework," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 409-429, November.
    6. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    7. Nuno Quental & Júlia M. Lourenço & Fernando Nunes da Silva, 2011. "Sustainable development policy: goals, targets and political cycles," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 15-29, January/F.
    8. Edwin Zaccai & William Adams, 2012. "How far are biodiversity loss and climate change similar as policy issues?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 557-571, August.
    9. Marcel Kok & Bert Metz & Jan Verhagen & Sascha Van Rooijen, 2008. "Integrating development and climate policies: national and international benefits," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 103-118, March.
    10. Jean Hugé & Hai Le Trinh & Pham Hai & Jan Kuilman & Luc Hens, 2010. "Sustainability indicators for clean development mechanism projects in Vietnam," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 561-571, August.
    11. Svatava Janoušková & Tomáš Hák & Bedřich Moldan, 2018. "Global SDGs Assessments: Helping or Confusing Indicators?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Jean Huge & Luc Janssens De Bisthoven & Mathilda Mushiete & Anne Julie Rochette & Soraya Candido & Hilde Keunen & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Nico Koedam & Maarten P M Vanhove, 2020. "EIA-driven biodiversity mainstreaming in development cooperation: Confronting expectations and practice in the DR Congo," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/298776, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Bert Metz & Marcel Kok, 2008. "Integrating development and climate policies," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 99-102, March.
    14. Jean Huge & Anne Julie Rochette & Luc Janssens de Bisthoven & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Nico Koedam & Maarten P M Vanhove, 2017. "Utilitarian framings of biodiversity shape environmental impact assessment in development cooperation," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/258845, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tan, Ruipeng & Hou, Ke & Wu, Huaqing, 2025. "The cost of biodiversity protection: National Key Ecological Functional Zone and labor demand in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean Huge & Luc Janssens De Bisthoven & Mathilda Mushiete & Anne Julie Rochette & Soraya Candido & Hilde Keunen & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Nico Koedam & Maarten P M Vanhove, 2020. "EIA-driven biodiversity mainstreaming in development cooperation: Confronting expectations and practice in the DR Congo," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/298776, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. repec:aen:journl:2010se1-low-stabilization-a09 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Brigitte Knopf & Ottmar Edenhofer & Christian Flachsland & Marcel T. J. Kok & Hermann Lotze-Campen & Gunnar Luderer & Alexander Popp & Detlef P. van Vuuren, 2010. "Managing the Low-Carbon Transition - From Model Results to Policies," The Energy Journal, , vol. 31(1_suppl), pages 223-245, June.
    4. Kanokporn Swangjang, 2022. "Linkage of Sustainability to Environmental Impact Assessment Using the Concept of Ecosystem Services: Lessons from Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Issaka Sule Ayannor, 2021. "Setbacks to the Implementation of the Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions: Case Studies of the Namas of Ethiopia, Georgia and Indonesia," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 40(3), pages 33-44, September.
    6. Chris Bataille & Henri Waisman & Michel Colombier & Laura Segafredo & Jim Williams & Frank Jotzo, 2016. "The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(sup1), pages 7-26, June.
    7. Rakibul Alam & Khalid Md. Bahauddin, 2014. "Mainstreaming Climate Change. Adaptation into Regional Planning of Least Developed Countries: Strategy Implications for Regions in Bangladesh," Management of Sustainable Development, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Elizabeth Stanton, 2011. "Negishi welfare weights in integrated assessment models: the mathematics of global inequality," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 417-432, August.
    9. Francesco Scorza & Angela Pilogallo & Lucia Saganeiti & Beniamino Murgante, 2020. "Natura 2000 Areas and Sites of National Interest (SNI): Measuring (un)Integration between Naturalness Preservation and Environmental Remediation Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Zhou, Guangyou & Zhu, Jieyu & Luo, Sumei, 2022. "The impact of fintech innovation on green growth in China: Mediating effect of green finance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Terry Cannon & Detlef Müller-Mahn, 2010. "Vulnerability, resilience and development discourses in context of climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 55(3), pages 621-635, December.
    12. Jan Mayrhofer & Joyeeta Gupta, 2016. "The politics of co-benefits in India’s energy sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(7), pages 1344-1363, November.
    13. Gabriela Ileana Iacobuţă & Niklas Höhne & Heleen Laura van Soest & Rik Leemans, 2021. "Transitioning to Low-Carbon Economies under the 2030 Agenda: Minimizing Trade-Offs and Enhancing Co-Benefits of Climate-Change Action for the SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Eric Chu, 2016. "The political economy of urban climate adaptation and development planning in Surat, India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(2), pages 281-298, March.
    15. Nicola Favretto & Andrew J. Dougill & Lindsay C. Stringer & Stavros Afionis & Claire H. Quinn, 2018. "Links between Climate Change Mitigation, Adaptation and Development in Land Policy and Ecosystem Restoration Projects: Lessons from South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Åsa Persson, 2009. "Environmental policy integration and bilateral development assistance: challenges and opportunities with an evolving governance framework," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 409-429, November.
    17. Sudhakara Reddy, B. & Assenza, Gaudenz B., 2009. "The great climate debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2997-3008, August.
    18. Beverdam, Jesper & Hubacek, Klaus & Scholtens, Bert & Sijtsma, Frans, 2025. "Improving biodiversity resilience requires both public and private finance: A life-cycle analysis of biodiversity finance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    19. Elizabeth A. Stanton & Frank Ackerman, 2009. "Climate and development economics: Balancing science, politics and equity," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(4), pages 262-273, November.
    20. Peterson St-Laurent, Guillaume & Locatelli, Bruno & Hoberg, George & Gukova, Veronika & Hagerman, Shannon, 2021. "Models for integrating climate objectives in forest policy: Towards adaptation-first?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    21. Banuet-Martinez, M. & Hernandez-Velasco, A.J. & Dominguez-Sanchez, C.A. & Espinosa-Romero, M.J. & Vera-Velazquez, F. & Sandoval-Arauz, S.A. & Vazquez-Murillo, S.C. & Ensenada, S.C.P.P. & Buzos y Pesca, 2025. "“It seems that climate change is already harming us all”: Complex climate change, health, and socio-ecological risks for Mexican fishing communities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/388634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.