IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-387863.html

Institutions, farm/rural household behavior and gender: Evidence from Colombia and Burundi

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse Willem D'Anjou

Abstract

The role of economic institutions in shaping development trajectories has been a central debate in economic thought since Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations (1776). This dissertation examines the intricate relationship between economic institutions and development, drawing upon the foundational contributions of Douglass North (1990) and subsequent scholarship, including Acemoglu and Robinson (2012). Institutions—both formal and informal—govern economic behavior, shape incentives, and influence economic outcomes and this relationship runs in both directions. While formal institutions such as laws and regulations play a crucial role, informal institutions often determine economic interactions in contexts where formal structures are weak or absent, as observed in rural areas of developing countries like Colombia and Burundi. Institutional changes, such as land formalization, can generate significant economic shifts, affecting growth, inequality, and policy effectiveness.This dissertation contributes to the ongoing debate by providing empirical, quantitative and qualitative analyses of institutional dynamics in rural Colombia and Burundi. It explores the intersections of formal and informal institutions with intrahousehold dynamics, gender disparities, financial inclusion, conflict and land rights. Through rigorous methodological approaches, this research uncovers mechanisms through which institutions shape economic behavior and outcomes and the other way around. By shedding light on these processes, the dissertation aims to inform evidence-based policy interventions that promote inclusive and sustainable development. The findings underscore the need for institutional reforms tailored to the specific socio-economic and political contexts of developing nations, offering insights that extend beyond Colombia and Burundi to broader development challenges worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse Willem D'Anjou, 2025. "Institutions, farm/rural household behavior and gender: Evidence from Colombia and Burundi," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/387863, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/387863
    Note: Degree: Doctorat en Sciences économiques et de gestion
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/387863/3/PhD_Thesis_Jesse_Willem_d_Anjou.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/387863/4/Table_of_Content.pdf
    File Function: Table of content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Wolford & Saturnino M. Borras Jr. & Ruth Hall & Ian Scoones & Ben White & Wendy Wolford & Saturnino M. Borras Jr. & Ruth Hall & Ian Scoones & Ben White, 2013. "Governing Global Land Deals: The Role of the State in the Rush for Land," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 44(2), pages 189-210, March.
    2. Zhao, Chuanmin & Qu, Xi, 2024. "Place-based policies, rural employment, and intra-household resources allocation: Evidence from China’s economic zones," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liao, Chuan & Jung, Suhyun & Brown, Daniel G. & Agrawal, Arun, 2024. "Does land tenure change accelerate deforestation? A matching-based four-country comparison," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Glover, Steven & Jones, Sam, 2019. "Can commercial farming promote rural dynamism in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 110-121.
    3. Sara Balestri & Mario A. Maggioni, 2021. "This Land Is My Land! Large-Scale Land Acquisitions and Conflict Events in Sub-Saharan Africa," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 427-450, May.
    4. Hunsberger, Carol & Work, Courtney & Herre, Roman, 2018. "Linking climate change strategies and land conflicts in Cambodia: Evidence from the Greater Aural region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 309-320.
    5. Cheng, Qi & Yang, Jun, 2024. "Is green place-based policy effective in mitigating pollution? Firm-level evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 530-547.
    6. Anika Trebbin, 2021. "Land Grabbing and Jatropha in India: An Analysis of ‘Hyped’ Discourse on the Subject," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Woods, Kevin M., 2020. "Smaller-scale land grabs and accumulation from below: Violence, coercion and consent in spatially uneven agrarian change in Shan State, Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Murat Arsel & Murat Arsel & Anirban Dasgupta, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 644-665, July.
    9. Nolte, Kerstin & Voget-Kleschin, Lieske, 2014. "Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions: An Evaluation of Three Cases in Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 654-668.
    10. Russo Lopes, Gabriela & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Reis, Tiago N.P. dos, 2021. "Maldevelopment revisited: Inclusiveness and social impacts of soy expansion over Brazil’s Cerrado in Matopiba," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Rignall, Karen & Kusunose, Yoko, 2018. "Governing livelihood and land use transitions: The role of customary tenure in southeastern Morocco," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 91-103.
    12. Wayessa, Gutu Olana, 2020. "Impacts of land leases in Oromia, Ethiopia: Changes in access to livelihood resources for local people," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    13. Luu Van Duy & Le Thi Thu Huong & Hiroshi Isoda & Yuichiro Amekawa & Le Thi Thanh Loan & Do Kim Chung, 2025. "Rubber Plantation Land Grabs and Agrarian Change: A Political Economy Analysis of Livelihood Pathways of Ethnic Minority Groups in Northwest Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Borras, Saturnino M. & Franco, Jennifer C. & Moreda, Tsegaye & Xu, Yunan & Bruna, Natacha & Afewerk Demena, Binyam, 2022. "The value of so-called ‘failed’ large-scale land acquisitions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Andrea P. Sosa Varrotti & Delia C. Ramírez & Paula C. Serpe, 2022. "Land grabbing and agribusiness in Argentina: five critical dimensions for analysing corporate strategies and its impacts over unequal actors," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 103(4), pages 417-437, December.
    16. Sara B Pritchard & Steven A Wolf & Wendy Wolford, 2016. "Knowledge and the politics of land," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(4), pages 616-625, April.
    17. Femke van Noorloos & Christien Klaufus & Griet Steel, 2019. "Land in urban debates: Unpacking the grab–development dichotomy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 855-867, April.
    18. Murat Arsel & Bhaskar Vira, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 762-776, July.
    19. Baka, Jennifer & Bailis, Robert, 2014. "Wasteland energy-scapes: A comparative energy flow analysis of India's biofuel and biomass economies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 8-17.
    20. Visser, Oane (Виссер, Оане), 2021. "Western agricultural investors in Russia and Ukraine: From fascination with soil to disappointment with climate [Западные Агроинвесторы В России И Украине: Очарованные Почвой—Разочарованные Климатом]," Russian Peasant Studies, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 21-49.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/387863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.