IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-387863.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutions, farm/rural household behavior and gender: Evidence from Colombia and Burundi

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse Willem D'Anjou

Abstract

The role of economic institutions in shaping development trajectories has been a central debate in economic thought since Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations (1776). This dissertation examines the intricate relationship between economic institutions and development, drawing upon the foundational contributions of Douglass North (1990) and subsequent scholarship, including Acemoglu and Robinson (2012). Institutions—both formal and informal—govern economic behavior, shape incentives, and influence economic outcomes and this relationship runs in both directions. While formal institutions such as laws and regulations play a crucial role, informal institutions often determine economic interactions in contexts where formal structures are weak or absent, as observed in rural areas of developing countries like Colombia and Burundi. Institutional changes, such as land formalization, can generate significant economic shifts, affecting growth, inequality, and policy effectiveness.This dissertation contributes to the ongoing debate by providing empirical, quantitative and qualitative analyses of institutional dynamics in rural Colombia and Burundi. It explores the intersections of formal and informal institutions with intrahousehold dynamics, gender disparities, financial inclusion, conflict and land rights. Through rigorous methodological approaches, this research uncovers mechanisms through which institutions shape economic behavior and outcomes and the other way around. By shedding light on these processes, the dissertation aims to inform evidence-based policy interventions that promote inclusive and sustainable development. The findings underscore the need for institutional reforms tailored to the specific socio-economic and political contexts of developing nations, offering insights that extend beyond Colombia and Burundi to broader development challenges worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse Willem D'Anjou, 2025. "Institutions, farm/rural household behavior and gender: Evidence from Colombia and Burundi," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/387863, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/387863
    Note: Degree: Doctorat en Sciences économiques et de gestion
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/387863/3/PhD_Thesis_Jesse_Willem_d_Anjou.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/387863/4/Table_of_Content.pdf
    File Function: Table of content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Chuanmin & Qu, Xi, 2024. "Place-based policies, rural employment, and intra-household resources allocation: Evidence from China’s economic zones," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Wendy Wolford & Saturnino M. Borras Jr. & Ruth Hall & Ian Scoones & Ben White & Wendy Wolford & Saturnino M. Borras Jr. & Ruth Hall & Ian Scoones & Ben White, 2013. "Governing Global Land Deals: The Role of the State in the Rush for Land," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 44(2), pages 189-210, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bennett, Nathan James & Govan, Hugh & Satterfield, Terre, 2015. "Ocean grabbing," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 61-68.
      • Wehner, Nicholas & Bennett, Nathan & Govan, Hugh & Satterfield, Terre, 2015. "Ocean grabbing," MarXiv bm6pf, Center for Open Science.
    2. Sara Balestri & Mario A. Maggioni, 2021. "This Land Is My Land! Large-Scale Land Acquisitions and Conflict Events in Sub-Saharan Africa," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 427-450, May.
    3. Hunsberger, Carol & Work, Courtney & Herre, Roman, 2018. "Linking climate change strategies and land conflicts in Cambodia: Evidence from the Greater Aural region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 309-320.
    4. Cheng, Qi & Yang, Jun, 2024. "Is green place-based policy effective in mitigating pollution? Firm-level evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 530-547.
    5. Woods, Kevin M., 2020. "Smaller-scale land grabs and accumulation from below: Violence, coercion and consent in spatially uneven agrarian change in Shan State, Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    6. Nolte, Kerstin & Voget-Kleschin, Lieske, 2014. "Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions: An Evaluation of Three Cases in Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 654-668.
    7. Rignall, Karen & Kusunose, Yoko, 2018. "Governing livelihood and land use transitions: The role of customary tenure in southeastern Morocco," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 91-103.
    8. Andrea P. Sosa Varrotti & Delia C. Ramírez & Paula C. Serpe, 2022. "Land grabbing and agribusiness in Argentina: five critical dimensions for analysing corporate strategies and its impacts over unequal actors," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 103(4), pages 417-437, December.
    9. Sara B Pritchard & Steven A Wolf & Wendy Wolford, 2016. "Knowledge and the politics of land," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(4), pages 616-625, April.
    10. Femke van Noorloos & Christien Klaufus & Griet Steel, 2019. "Land in urban debates: Unpacking the grab–development dichotomy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 855-867, April.
    11. Visser, Oane (Виссер, Оане), 2021. "Western agricultural investors in Russia and Ukraine: From fascination with soil to disappointment with climate [Западные Агроинвесторы В России И Украине: Очарованные Почвой—Разочарованные Климато," Russian Peasant Studies, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 21-49.
    12. Jenny E Goldstein, 2016. "Knowing the subterranean: Land grabbing, oil palm, and divergent expertise in Indonesia’s peat soil," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(4), pages 754-770, April.
    13. Baka, Jennifer & Bailis, Robert, 2014. "Wasteland energy-scapes: a comparative energy flow analysis of India's biofuel and biomass economies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59896, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. İnan, Canan Emek & Albulut, Koray, 2022. "Linking actors and scales by green grabbing in Bozbük and Kazıklı," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Dell’Angelo, Jampel & D’Odorico, Paolo & Rulli, Maria Cristina & Marchand, Philippe, 2017. "The Tragedy of the Grabbed Commons: Coercion and Dispossession in the Global Land Rush," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1-12.
    16. Abagna, Matthew Amalitinga & Hornok, Cecília & Mulyukova, Alina, 2025. "Place-based Policies and Household Wealth in Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    17. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Mălina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Reti, Kinga-Olga, 2019. "My land is my food: Exploring social function of large land deals using food security–land deals relation in five Eastern European countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 729-741.
    18. Schenk, Mario, 2018. "Die Rolle des Staates in Konflikten um 'land grabbing' in Nordbrasilien," GLOCON Working Paper Series 8, Freie Universität Berlin, Junior Research Group "Global Change – Local Conflicts?" (GLOCON).
    19. Lin, Xin & Hui, Eddie Chi-man & Cong, Zhenglong & Shen, Jianfu, 2026. "Solving coordination failures: Collective land transfer rights and rural entrepreneurship," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    20. Manda, Simon & Banda, Lizzy, 2023. "Seeing like the state? Customary land pressures and fracturing tenure systems in rural Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/387863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.