IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-170932.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Biomass production of 17 poplar clones in a short-rotation coppice culture on a waste disposal site and its relation to soil characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Ilse Laureysens
  • Jan Bogaert
  • Ronny Blust
  • Reinhart Ceulemans

Abstract

This study describes the above ground biomass production of 17 poplar (Populus spp.) clones after a 4-year rotation in a short-rotation coppice culture. In addition, the link with soil characteristics was studied. In April 1996, an experimental field plantation with 10,000 cuttings ha-1 was established in Boom (province of Antwerp, Belgium) on a former waste disposal site. A randomised block design was used with three replicate plots (9m x 11.5 m). At the end of the establishment year, all plants were cut back to a height of 5 cm to create a coppice culture. At the end of the fourth year after coppicing, shoot diameters of all living and dead shoots were measured, and biomass production was estimated with an allometric power equation. A composite soil sample was taken for all plots, and pH, organic matter, water content, bulk density, content of nutrients, minerals and heavy metals were determined. Highest production was found for P. trichocarpa x P. deltoides hybrids Hazendans and Hoogvorst, P. trichocarpa clones Fritzi Pauley, Columbia River and Trichobel, and native P. nigra clone Wolterson with mean annual biomass production ranging between 8.0 and 11.4 Mg ha-1 per year. Lowest performance was observed for P. trichocarpa x P. deltoides hybrid Boelare, P. deltoides x P. trichocarpa hybrids IBW1, IBW2 and IBW3, and P. deltoides x P. nigra hybrids Gaver and Gibecq with a mean annual biomass production ranging between 2.8 and 4.7 Mg ha-1. Mean dead biomass accounted for less than 2% of total standing biomass for all clones. Some clones exhibited a uniform production across replicates, implying low susceptibility to soil heterogeneity; other clones showed a high inter-replicate variation. However, no cause for this interreplicate variation was identified. A cluster analysis enabled identification of two groups of plots with significant differences in soil characteristics and in biomass production. But a Spearman's rank correlation test showed only a negative correlation between biomass production and plant available magnesium and potassium in the soil. A principal component analysis and multiple regression could not reveal an unambiguous impact of soil either, caused by the low variance in soil characteristics, the high genotypic variation and/or the impact of non-identified (environmental) factors. © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilse Laureysens & Jan Bogaert & Ronny Blust & Reinhart Ceulemans, 2004. "Biomass production of 17 poplar clones in a short-rotation coppice culture on a waste disposal site and its relation to soil characteristics," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/170932, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/170932
    Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Trnka & M. Trnka & J. Fialová & V. Koutecký & M. Fajman & Z. Žalud & S. Hejduk, 2008. "Biomass production and survival rates of selected poplar clones grown under a short-rotation on arable land," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(2), pages 78-88.
    2. Sevigne, Eva & Gasol, Carles M. & Brun, Filippo & Rovira, Laura & Pagés, Josep Maria & Camps, Francesc & Rieradevall, Joan & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2011. "Water and energy consumption of Populus spp. bioenergy systems: A case study in Southern Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 1133-1140, February.
    3. Pandey, Vimal Chandra & Bajpai, Omesh & Singh, Nandita, 2016. "Energy crops in sustainable phytoremediation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 58-73.
    4. Rugani, Benedetto & Golkowska, Katarzyna & Vázquez-Rowe, Ian & Koster, Daniel & Benetto, Enrico & Verdonckt, Pieter, 2015. "Simulation of environmental impact scores within the life cycle of mixed wood chips from alternative short rotation coppice systems in Flanders (Belgium)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 449-464.
    5. Craig M.T. Johnston & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2014. "Carbon Neutrality of Hardwood and Softwood Biomass: Issues of Temporal Preference," Working Papers 2014-06, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    6. Martin J. C. Robinson & Amalesh Dhar & M. Anne Naeth & Connie K. Nichol, 2022. "Phosphogypsum Stack Reclamation Using Soil Amendments and Short-Rotational Woody Species," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Paniagua, S. & Escudero, L. & Escapa, C. & Coimbra, R.N. & Otero, M. & Calvo, L.F., 2016. "Effect of waste organic amendments on Populus sp biomass production and thermal characteristics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 166-174.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/170932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.