IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucd/wpaper/201801.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tenure Mixing to Combat Public Housing Stigmatization: external benefits, internal challenges and contextual influences in three Dublin neighbourhoods

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Carnegie

    (Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York)

  • Michelle Norris

    (School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Ireland)

  • Michael Byrne

    (School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

Combatting stigma in public housing is a key concern among policy makers in the Republic of Ireland and internationally and this paper critically assesses the mechanism most commonly employed to achieve this – ‘income mixing’ or ‘poverty deconcentration’ of public rented neighbourhoods by encouraging households with a wider mix of incomes to live there. This is most commonly achieved by ‘tenure mixing’ - providing private housing alongside public housing on the grounds that occupants of the former tenure tend to have higher incomes than occupants of the latter. To do this the paper draws together empirical research on three public housing neighbourhoods in Dublin - Ireland’s capital and largest city - and insights from the critical geography and urban studies literature, to critically examine the effectiveness of tenure mixing as a public housing destigmatizing tool. The analysis presented here demonstrates that tenure mixing often produces contradictory results – in terms of reduced external stigma but heightened internal or within neighbourhood stigmatization. It links these outcomes to the policy and socio-economic contextual factors which we argue which play a central but underappreciated role in shaping the implementation of tenure mixing and its impact on public housing stigmatization.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Carnegie & Michelle Norris & Michael Byrne, 2018. "Tenure Mixing to Combat Public Housing Stigmatization: external benefits, internal challenges and contextual influences in three Dublin neighbourhoods," Working Papers 201801, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:201801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ucd.ie/geary/static/publications/workingpapers/gearywp201801.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle Norris & Meneloas Gkartzios, 2011. "Twenty years of property-led urban regeneration in Ireland : outputs, impacts, implications," Open Access publications 10197/2970, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    2. Michelle Norris & Menelaos Gkartzios, 2011. "Twenty years of property-led urban regeneration in Ireland : outputs, impacts, implications," Open Access publications 10197/5166, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    3. Declan Redmond & Paula Russell, 2008. "Social Housing Regeneration and the Creation of Sustainable Communities in Dublin," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(3), pages 168-179, August.
    4. Michelle Norris & Menelaos Gkartzios, 2011. "Twenty years of property-led urban regeneration in Ireland: outputs, impacts, implications," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 257-264, July.
    5. Robert J. Chaskin & Mark L. Joseph, 2013. "‘Positive’ Gentrification, Social Control and the ‘Right to the City’ in Mixed-Income Communities: Uses and Expectations of Space and Place," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 480-502, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:201801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Geary Tech). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/geucdie.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.