IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tse/wpaper/131008.html

Dynamic Delegation with Reputation Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Lukyanov, Georgy
  • Vlasova, Anna

Abstract

We study dynamic delegation with reputation feedback: a long-lived expert advises a sequence of implementers whose effort responds to current reputation, altering outcome informativeness and belief updates. We solve for a recursive, belief-based equilibrium and show that advice is a reputation-dependent cutoff in the expert’s signal. A diagnosticity condition—failures at least as informative as successes—implies reputational conservatism: the cutoff (weakly) rises with reputation. Comparative statics are transparent: greater private precision or a higher good-state prior lowers the cutoff, whereas patience (value curvature) raises it. Reputation is a submartingale under competent types and a supermartingale under less competent types; we separate boundary hitting into learning (news generated infinitely often) versus no-news absorption. A success-contingent bonus implements any target experimentation rate with a plug-in calibration in a Gaussian benchmark. The framework yields testable predictions and a measurement map for surgery (operate vs. conservative care).

Suggested Citation

  • Lukyanov, Georgy & Vlasova, Anna, 2025. "Dynamic Delegation with Reputation Feedback," TSE Working Papers 25-1677, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
  • Handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:131008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/wp/2025/wp_tse_1677.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johanna Birkhäuer & Jens Gaab & Joe Kossowsky & Sebastian Hasler & Peter Krummenacher & Christoph Werner & Heike Gerger, 2017. "Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haenssgen, Marco J. & Elliott, Elizabeth M. & Phommachanh, Sysavanh & Souksavanh, Ounkham & Okabayashi, Hironori & Kubota, Shogo, 2024. "Community engagement for stakeholder and community trust in healthcare: Short-term evaluation findings from a nationwide initiative in Lao PDR," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 354(C).
    2. Shreya S. Shrikhande & Sonja Merten & Olga Cambaco & Tristan Lee & Ravivarman Lakshmanasamy & Martin Röösli & Mohammad Aqiel Dalvie & Jürg Utzinger & Guéladio Cissé, 2023. "“Climate Change and Health?”: Knowledge and Perceptions among Key Stakeholders in Puducherry, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Richmond, Jennifer & Boynton, Marcella H. & Ozawa, Sachiko & Muessig, Kathryn E. & Cykert, Samuel & Ribisl, Kurt M., 2022. "Development and Validation of the Trust in My Doctor, Trust in Doctors in General, and Trust in the Health Care Team Scales," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    4. Broihanne, Marie-Hélène & Plotkina, Daria & Kleimeier, Stefanie & Göritz, Anja S. & Hoffmann, Arvid O.I., 2025. "Corrigendum to “How COVID-19 illness perceptions and individual shocks are associated with trust during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, France, Germany, and South Africa” [Health policy (2024) 105," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Wolsko, Christopher & Marino, Elizabeth & Keys, Susan, 2020. "Affirming cultural values for health: The case of firearm restriction in suicide prevention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    6. Holly Blake & Kathryn Watkins & Matthew Middleton & Natalia Stanulewicz, 2021. "Obesity and Diet Predict Attitudes towards Health Promotion in Pre-Registered Nurses and Midwives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Anna LIADOVA, 2018. "The New Trends in Medicine and Trust," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Veaceslav MANOLACHI & Cristian Mihail RUS & Svetlana RUSNAC (ed.), New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 22, pages 266-273, Editura Lumen.
    8. Rinn, Robin & Whittal, Amanda & Kremeti, Eleni & Lippke, Sonia, 2024. "The social class of orthopedic rehabilitation patients: Are there differences in subjective health, return to work motivation, and participation in aftercare interventions?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    9. Li, Changle & Khan, M. Mahmud & Chen, Zhuo, 2023. "Public trust of physicians in China improved since the COVID-19 pandemic Began," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    10. Bireswar Dutta & Mei-Hui Peng & Chien-Chih Chen & Shu-Lung Sun, 2022. "Role of Infodemics on Social Media in the Development of People’s Readiness to Follow COVID-19 Preventive Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Pavolini, Emmanuele & Kuhlmann, Ellen & Agartan, Tuba I. & Burau, Viola & Mannion, Russell & Speed, Ewen, 2018. "Healthcare governance, professions and populism: Is there a relationship? An explorative comparison of five European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(10), pages 1140-1148.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:131008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsetofr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.