IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20260023.html

Barron-Loss Adaptive Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Ramon F. A. de Punder

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Mathijs R. G. Dijkstra

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Cees G. H. Diks

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

Classical score-driven models update time-varying parameters using gradients of model-implied log-likelihoods, which can be sensitive to misspecification, outliers, and structural breaks. We embed the flexible Barron loss within the quasi score-driven (QSD) framework, allowing the degree of robustness to be learned from the data. The resulting Barron-Loss Adaptive Estimation (BLADE) filter generates a strictly stationary, ergodic, and invertible sequence of time-varying parameters under mild regularity conditions. Within an extended QSD estimation framework, obtained by generalizing the required moment condition, the associated estimator is shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal. The Barron loss is strictly consistent for a family of functionals indexed by the shape parameter γ, enabling smooth adaptation between classical and robust targets. We show that the BLADE update belongs to the class of Proper and Robust Autoregressive Derivative Adaptive (PRADA) models and is therefore expected divergence reducing, with more robust updates achieving an at least as large expected local divergence reduction as less robust ones over explicit intervals of step sizes and, under contamination, of contamination proportions. Monte Carlo experiments confirm these findings and show superior performance relative to GARCH and βt–GARCH models under contamination; an application to Bitcoin log-returns shows BLADE outperforming leading benchmarks out of sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramon F. A. de Punder & Mathijs R. G. Dijkstra & Cees G. H. Diks, 2026. "Barron-Loss Adaptive Estimation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 26-023/III, Tinbergen Institute, revised 18 Aug 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/26023.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harvey,Andrew C., 2013. "Dynamic Models for Volatility and Heavy Tails," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107630024.
    2. Engle, Robert F, 1982. "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 987-1007, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denisa Banulescu-Radu & Christophe Hurlin & Bertrand Candelon & Sébastien Laurent, 2016. "Do We Need High Frequency Data to Forecast Variances?," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 123-124, pages 135-174.
    2. Francq, Christian & Zakoian, Jean-Michel, 2024. "Finite moments testing in a general class of nonlinear time series models," MPRA Paper 121193, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Sucarrat, Genaro & Grønneberg, Steffen & Escribano, Alvaro, 2016. "Estimation and inference in univariate and multivariate log-GARCH-X models when the conditional density is unknown," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 582-594.
    4. Catania, Leopoldo & Proietti, Tommaso, 2020. "Forecasting volatility with time-varying leverage and volatility of volatility effects," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1301-1317.
    5. Zhao, Zifeng & Zhang, Zhengjun & Chen, Rong, 2018. "Modeling maxima with autoregressive conditional Fréchet model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 325-351.
    6. Christian Francq & Genaro Sucarrat, 2018. "An Exponential Chi-Squared QMLE for Log-GARCH Models Via the ARMA Representation," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 129-154.
    7. Bernardi, Mauro & Catania, Leopoldo, 2018. "Portfolio optimisation under flexible dynamic dependence modelling," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-18.
    8. Nikolaos A. Kyriazis, 2021. "A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-46, June.
    9. repec:rim:rimwps:19-01 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sucarrat, Genaro & Grønneberg, Steffen, 2016. "Models of Financial Return With Time-Varying Zero Probability," MPRA Paper 68931, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Leopoldo Catania, 2016. "Dynamic Adaptive Mixture Models," Papers 1603.01308, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    12. repec:cam:camjip:2111 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Lucas, André & Zhang, Xin, 2016. "Score-driven exponentially weighted moving averages and Value-at-Risk forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 293-302.
    14. Doan, Bao & Papageorgiou, Nicolas & Reeves, Jonathan J. & Sherris, Michael, 2018. "Portfolio management with targeted constant market volatility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 134-147.
    15. Song, Shijia & Li, Handong, 2022. "Predicting VaR for China's stock market: A score-driven model based on normal inverse Gaussian distribution," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. De Lira Salvatierra, Irving & Patton, Andrew J., 2015. "Dynamic copula models and high frequency data," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 120-135.
    17. Fiorentini, Gabriele & Sentana, Enrique, 2021. "New testing approaches for mean–variance predictability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 516-538.
    18. Francisco Blasques & Siem Jan Koopman & André Lucas, 2014. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation for correctly Specified Generalized Autoregressive Score Models: Feedback Effects, Contraction Conditions and Asymptotic Properties," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-074/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Mohamed El Ghourabi & Asma Nani & Imed Gammoudi, 2021. "A value‐at‐risk computation based on heavy‐tailed distribution for dynamic conditional score models," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 2790-2799, April.
    20. Fernanda Maria Müller & Fábio M Bayer, 2017. "Improved two-component tests in Beta-Skew-t-EGARCH models," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2364-2373.
    21. Cerrato, Mario & Crosby, John & Kim, Minjoo & Zhao, Yang, 2015. "US Monetary and Fiscal Policies - Conflict or Cooperation?," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon TN 2015-78, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    22. Blasques, Francisco & Ji, Jiangyu & Lucas, André, 2016. "Semiparametric score driven volatility models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 58-69.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.