IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20010068.html

Evolution in Games with a Continuous Action Space

Author

Listed:
  • Matthijs van Veelen

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

This discussion paper resulted in a publication in 'Economic Theory' , 2009, 39(3), 355-376. Allowing for games with a continuous action space, we deal with the question whether and when static conceptslike evolutionary stability can shed any light on what happens in the dynamical context of a population playingthese games. The continuous equivalents of theorems for the finite case are either harder to prove or simplyuntrue. In some cases that fall within the latter category, sensible additional assumptions can repair the damage.Apart from that it turns out that we can no longer ignore the mutation process; with a continuous action space itmakes quite a difference what kind of shocks we consider to be likely.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthijs van Veelen, 2001. "Evolution in Games with a Continuous Action Space," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 01-068/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20010068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/01068.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akdeniz, Aslıhan & van Veelen, Matthijs, 2023. "Evolution and the ultimatum game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 570-612.
    2. Konrad Podczeck & Daniela Puzzello, 2012. "Independent random matching," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(1), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Matthijs van Veelen & Benjamin Allen & Moshe Hoffman & Burton Simon & Carl Veller, 2016. "Inclusive Fitness," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-055/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Aradhana Narang & A. J. Shaiju, 2019. "Evolutionary Stability of Polymorphic Profiles in Asymmetric Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 1126-1142, December.
    5. Dharini Hingu & K. S. Mallikarjuna Rao & A. J. Shaiju, 2018. "Evolutionary Stability of Polymorphic Population States in Continuous Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 141-156, March.
    6. Dharini Hingu & K. S. Mallikarjuna Rao & A. J. Shaiju, 2020. "On superiority and weak stability of population states in evolutionary games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(2), pages 751-760, April.
    7. Aslihan Akdeniz & Christopher Graser & Matthijs van Veelen, 2020. "Homo Moralis and regular altruists – preference evolution for when they disagree," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-062/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. van Veelen, Matthijs & García, Julián, 2019. "In and out of equilibrium II: Evolution in repeated games with discounting and complexity costs," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 113-130.
    9. Zhen Xu & Shudan Zheng, 2024. "An evolutionary game-theoretic analysis of the "multi-agent co-governance" system of unfair competition on internet platforms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-29, June.
    10. Karl D. Lewis & A. J. Shaiju, 2024. "Asymmetric Replicator Dynamics on Polish Spaces: Invariance, Stability, and Convergence," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1160-1190, November.
    11. Matthijs Veelen & Peter Spreij, 2009. "Evolution in games with a continuous action space," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 39(3), pages 355-376, June.
    12. Sandholm, William H., 2015. "Population Games and Deterministic Evolutionary Dynamics," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    13. García, Julián & van Veelen, Matthijs, 2016. "In and out of equilibrium I: Evolution of strategies in repeated games with discounting," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 161-189.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20010068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.