IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sza/wpaper/wpapers394.html

Inequality in the Cape Colony, 1685–1844: New Measures, New Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Johan Fourie

    (LEAP, Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University)

Abstract

South Africa has one of the highest levels of inequality globally. This paper shows that such inequality is not a recent development. Using several newly transcribed datasets from the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth-century Cape Colony, I calculate historical wealth inequality across different groups and regions. The sources – including tax censuses, probate inventories, slave valuation rolls and Khoe mission settlement records – offer rare insight into the structure of preindustrial society, allowing for comparisons over time and across settler, enslaved and Khoe households. I go beyond the Gini coefficient by computing the Theil index, the Palma ratio and bootstrapped confidence intervals. The results reveal persistently high levels of within-group inequality and highlight the concentration of productive resources across all groups with available data. The corrected basket Gini for the Stellenbosch-Drakenstein district rises from approximately 0.74 in the 1690s to approximately 0.89 by the late eighteenth century, before dipping slightly in the early nineteenth century; the Theil index peaks above 3.6 in the late eighteenth century before falling sharply; and the Palma ratio reaches extreme values – exceeding 3,000 in some decades – revealing a large assetless population. Including enslaved people as zero-asset households pushes the Gini above 0.95, comparable to Caribbean slave economies. In international perspective, the Cape Colony ranks among the most unequal preindustrial societies for which quantitative evidence exists. The evidence suggests that severe economic inequality has long been a defining feature of South African society.

Suggested Citation

  • Johan Fourie, 2026. "Inequality in the Cape Colony, 1685–1844: New Measures, New Evidence," Working Papers 04/2026, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sza:wpaper:wpapers394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ekon.sun.ac.za/wpapers/2026/wp042026/wp042026.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • N37 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Africa; Oceania
    • N57 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - Africa; Oceania

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sza:wpaper:wpapers394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melt van Schoor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desunza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.