Still more on why we should bury the Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital: A Supplementary Note
The purpose of this note is to supplement the authorâ€™s earlier remarks on the unsatisfactory nature of the neoclassical account of how the return on capital is determined. (See Strathclyde Discussion Paper 12-03: â€œThe Marginal Productivity Theory of the Price of Capital: An Historical Perspective on the Origins of the Codswallopâ€). The point is made via a simple illustration that certain matters which are problematical in neoclassical terms are perfectly straightforward when viewed from a classical perspective. Basically, the marginalist model of the nature of an economic system is not fit for purpose in that it fails to comprehend the essential features of a surplus-producing economic system as distinct from one merely of exchange.
|Date of creation:||Oct 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +44 (0)141 548 3842
Fax: +44 (0)141 548 4445
Web page: http://www.strath.ac.uk/economics/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Grieve, Roy, 2012. "The Marginal Productivity Theory Of The Price Of Capital: An Historical Perspective On The Origins Of The Codswallop," SIRE Discussion Papers 2012-05, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:str:wpaper:1215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kirsty Hall)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.