IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/stc/stcp8e/202301100002e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Provincial Nominee Program: Retention in province of landing

Author

Listed:
  • Garnett Picot
  • Eden Crossman
  • Feng Hou

Abstract

The Provincial Nominee Program (PNP) is designed to contribute to the more equitable distribution of new immigrants across Canada. A related objective is the retention and integration of provincial nominees in the nominating province or territory. This article examines the retention of PNP immigrants at both the national and provincial or territorial levels. The analysis uses data from the Immigrant Landing File and tax records, along with three indicators of retention, to measure the propensity of a province or territory to retain immigrants. Results showed that the retention of PNP immigrants in the province or territory of landing was generally high. Overall, 89% of the provincial nominees who landed in 2019 had stayed in their intended province or territory at the end of the landing year. However, there was large variation by province or territory, ranging from 69% to 97%. Of those nominees located in a province at the end of the landing year, a large proportion (in the mid-80% range) remained in that province five years later. Again, there was significant variation by province, ranging from 39% to 94%. At the national level, both short- and longer-term provincial and territorial retention rates were lower among provincial nominees than among other economic immigrants. However, after adjusting for differences in the province of residence, sociodemographic characteristics and economic conditions, the provincial nominee retention rate was marginally higher than that among federal skilled workers during the first three years in Canada, and there was little difference after five years. Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia had the highest PNP retention rates, and Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, and New Brunswick, the lowest. This gap among provinces tended to increase significantly with years since immigration. Accounting for the provincial unemployment rate explained some of the differences in retention rates between the Atlantic provinces and Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia. However, even after adjusting for a rich set of control variables, a significant retention rate difference among provinces persisted. Provinces and territories can benefit from the PNP not only through the nominees retained in the province or territory, but also from those migrating from other provinces or territories. Ontario was a magnet for the secondary migration of provincial nominees. After accounting for both outflows and inflows of provincial nominees, Ontario was the only province or territory that had a large net gain from this process, with significant inflows of provincial nominees from other provinces. Overall, long-term retention of provincial nominees tended to be quite high in Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia, particularly when considering inflows, as well as outflows. Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia tended to have an intermediate level, but still relatively high longer-term retention rates. Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador had the lowest retention.

Suggested Citation

  • Garnett Picot & Eden Crossman & Feng Hou, 2023. "The Provincial Nominee Program: Retention in province of landing," Economic and Social Reports 202301100002e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies and Modelling Branch.
  • Handle: RePEc:stc:stcp8e:202301100002e
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202301100002-eng
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/36-28-0001/2023011/article/00002-eng.htm
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/36-28-0001/2023011/article/00002-eng.pdf?st=iZrZ4nl4
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202301100002-eng?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aneta Bonikowska & Feng Hou & Garnett Picot, 2017. "New Immigrants Seeking New Places: The Role of Policy Changes in the Regional Distribution of New Immigrants to Canada," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 174-190, March.
    2. Manish Pandey & James Townsend, 2013. "Provincial Nominee Programs: An Evaluation of the Earnings and Settlement Rates of Nominees," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 39(4), pages 603-618, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Garnett Picot & Eden Crossman & Feng Hou, 2023. "Provincial Nominee Program: Recent trends and provincial differences in earnings outcomes," Economic and Social Reports 202301200004e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies and Modelling Branch.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Haan & Yuchen Li & Lindsay Finlay, 2024. "Stay a While: the Retention of Immigrants in Rural Canada," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 715-736, June.
    2. Wulong Gu & Feng Hou & Garnett Picot, 2020. "Immigration and firm productivity: evidence from the Canadian Employer-Employee Dynamics Database," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 121-137, December.
    3. Garnett Picot & Feng Hou & Eden Crossman, 2023. "The Provincial Nominee Program: Its expansion in Canada," Economic and Social Reports 202300700004e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies and Modelling Branch.
    4. Hou, Feng & Picot , Garnett, 2015. "Immigration, Low Income and Income Inequality in Canada: What’s New in the 2000s?," CLSSRN working papers clsrn_admin-2015-2, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 25 Jan 2015.
    5. Mike Shannon, 2015. "Canadian migration destinations of recent immigrants and interprovincial migrants: similarities, differences and explanations," IZA Journal of Migration and Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-32, December.
    6. David A. Green & Christopher Worswick, 2017. "Canadian economics research on immigration through the lens of theories of justice," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(5), pages 1262-1303, December.
    7. Aneta Bonikowska & Feng Hou & Garnett Picot, 2017. "New Immigrants Seeking New Places: The Role of Policy Changes in the Regional Distribution of New Immigrants to Canada," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 174-190, March.
    8. Casey Warman & Matthew D. Webb & Christopher Worswick, 2019. "Immigrant category of admission and the earnings of adults and children: how far does the apple fall?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 53-112, January.
    9. Amrita Hari & Chen Wang-Dufil, 2023. "Opportunities and Cracks in Canada’s Two-Step Migration Model During the Pandemic: Lessons from Chinese Migrant Experiences," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 641-659, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:stc:stcp8e:202301100002e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Brown (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.